The Worst Witch - S03E06 - The Hair Witch Project[480P]
- 11 years ago
The Five Responses-
"Correct"
"Probably Correct"
"Near"
and silence-"Compass Check"
"Warmer/Colder" - Warmer or Colder
"Hotter/Colder" - Hotter or Colder
(Ex.) coordinates-question "land and rising water"
answer-"Correct"
question-"White"
answer-"Correct"
question-"It's a hot springs!"
answer-30 seconds and only two feedback answer responses. "Correct", "Correct"
The "Target" was Mammoth Hot Springs
impossible to believe that the limited in-session feedback can account for it
Next-sketches and three-dimensional models from any angle not depicted in any of the feedback photos, "led" him to the "Target."
A Good Example-
first perception words
"Faceted," "domed," "shiny," "arches," "geometrical," and "broad hemispherical."
(Ex.) The point here is that there was no way the "hotter/colder" effect could possibly have lead me to the accurate results I achieve after four sparse pages and a mere ten minutes or so of work. I was especially careful to make sure there was no way I could have seen or learned anything about the target through ordinary means, either before or during the session. My success had to have come because of viewing, since there simply was no other possible explanation. This was only one of many such experiments during my training.
The issue about feedback is connected to a further important matter unlike training operational viewing sessions and virual laboratory experiments require monitoring themselves "blind" as to the nature of the "Target."
When viewer and monitor are alone in a "grey room" neither has a clue to the nature of the target.
In training, however, the monitor usually knows what the "target critic" often worries about, that having a monitor (or anyone else for that matter) in the room with a remote viewer before or during a session contaminates the process. Nonverbal cues from the monitor, suddenly shifting, shifting in the seat, or raising the eyebrows, catching his/her breath, emitting inadvertent murmur hint to the viewer?
Hans Clever "count" was doing arithmetic.
Ex. "What is four plus five?"
The animal, horse, or donkey would paw at the ground with his hoof nine times.
It did indeed seem as if Clever Hans was doing arithmetic.
However, in training both knew that both verbal and nonverbal cues could be handy when the monitor when the monitor used them in exactly the right way to promote the learning experience. Sometimes an inflection, a show of interest, or a careful choice of words can guide the novice viewer in the right direction when he becomes confused or uncertain.
Comet Hale-Bopp
"leading"
will sometimes
"lead"
"Baal" means "Lord" and was a title given to many local deities in Syria and Palestine. The supreme Baal was the great fertility god of the Canaanites, whose worship involved the sacrifice of children by burning. "They have built also the high places of Baal, to burn their sons with fire for burnt offerings unto Baal." CelticSun1st OfMay,lemegeton w/toad or cat's headNhoarse voice
"Correct"
"Probably Correct"
"Near"
and silence-"Compass Check"
"Warmer/Colder" - Warmer or Colder
"Hotter/Colder" - Hotter or Colder
(Ex.) coordinates-question "land and rising water"
answer-"Correct"
question-"White"
answer-"Correct"
question-"It's a hot springs!"
answer-30 seconds and only two feedback answer responses. "Correct", "Correct"
The "Target" was Mammoth Hot Springs
impossible to believe that the limited in-session feedback can account for it
Next-sketches and three-dimensional models from any angle not depicted in any of the feedback photos, "led" him to the "Target."
A Good Example-
first perception words
"Faceted," "domed," "shiny," "arches," "geometrical," and "broad hemispherical."
(Ex.) The point here is that there was no way the "hotter/colder" effect could possibly have lead me to the accurate results I achieve after four sparse pages and a mere ten minutes or so of work. I was especially careful to make sure there was no way I could have seen or learned anything about the target through ordinary means, either before or during the session. My success had to have come because of viewing, since there simply was no other possible explanation. This was only one of many such experiments during my training.
The issue about feedback is connected to a further important matter unlike training operational viewing sessions and virual laboratory experiments require monitoring themselves "blind" as to the nature of the "Target."
When viewer and monitor are alone in a "grey room" neither has a clue to the nature of the target.
In training, however, the monitor usually knows what the "target critic" often worries about, that having a monitor (or anyone else for that matter) in the room with a remote viewer before or during a session contaminates the process. Nonverbal cues from the monitor, suddenly shifting, shifting in the seat, or raising the eyebrows, catching his/her breath, emitting inadvertent murmur hint to the viewer?
Hans Clever "count" was doing arithmetic.
Ex. "What is four plus five?"
The animal, horse, or donkey would paw at the ground with his hoof nine times.
It did indeed seem as if Clever Hans was doing arithmetic.
However, in training both knew that both verbal and nonverbal cues could be handy when the monitor when the monitor used them in exactly the right way to promote the learning experience. Sometimes an inflection, a show of interest, or a careful choice of words can guide the novice viewer in the right direction when he becomes confused or uncertain.
Comet Hale-Bopp
"leading"
will sometimes
"lead"
"Baal" means "Lord" and was a title given to many local deities in Syria and Palestine. The supreme Baal was the great fertility god of the Canaanites, whose worship involved the sacrifice of children by burning. "They have built also the high places of Baal, to burn their sons with fire for burnt offerings unto Baal." CelticSun1st OfMay,lemegeton w/toad or cat's headNhoarse voice