Speaking on Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath’s remark on Gyanvapi, Advocate Subhash Nandan Chaturvedi and Advocate Madan Mohan Yadav representing the Hindu side in the Gyanvapi case welcomed the statement on July 31.
“The lateral part of Gyanvapi is the fractional remains of the Nagara style of temple architecture. The whole ‘Vastu’ resembles to the temple of Nagara style,” Advocate Madan Mohan Yadav told ANI.
“The lateral part of Gyanvapi is the fractional remains of the Nagara style of temple architecture. The whole ‘Vastu’ resembles to the temple of Nagara style,” Advocate Madan Mohan Yadav told ANI.
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00 Now the head of state has made it clear that the Gyanvapi should not be called a mosque.
00:14 And the Muslim party can correct the historical mistake and correct the mistake. What do you have to say about this?
00:21 This is not a stand of a Yogi. What Yogi has said is the truth.
00:31 The truth is that after independence, people who thought of ending the Indian culture and Hindutva,
00:43 the Muslim party has created an atmosphere that the Gyanvapi is a mosque.
00:51 Both the Gyanvapi and the mosque have to be followed with the same attitude.
00:59 The head of state has accepted this. He is a person who is sitting on a constitutional post.
01:14 All the walls of that area, the pillars that are left, the statues that are visible in that area, because we have been a part of the last commissioner survey.
01:29 You were present. What did you see? What was on the walls?
01:33 All the big stone bricks on the walls, all the stone bricks have been made on the trident.
01:43 All the pillars have our goddess, god, Brahma lotus, our trident, our health, our Indian art, our many stones have our slokas, Sanskrit written on them.
01:58 The whole audience is shouting that I am a temple.
02:03 You say that it is a mosque.
02:05 And tell you something else, the biggest thing, the central dome, which is the upper part of our home,
02:14 that is, the central mandap, under that mandap, the mosque that is occupied and the mosque that offers prayers,
02:21 the maulvi who offers prayers, where he stands and offers prayers to all the worshippers,
02:27 all the walls behind him have a trident on all the stones.
02:32 Who made this? We didn't make it.
02:36 That is, it was a temple, you broke the temple, you occupied the mosque and gave the form of the mosque.
02:42 Everything is shouting that he is saying that I am a temple.
02:47 All the forms of the temple are there.
02:51 That is why saying that Gyanvapi is a temple is a welcome step of the Chief Minister.
02:57 Gyanvapi cannot be called a mosque.
03:00 There will be a controversy.
03:02 And the historical mistake that has been made so far, the Muslim party can come forward and say that yes, we made a mistake.
03:09 What do you think about this?
03:11 Undoubtedly, I will talk about this in the context of law.
03:15 In 1995, Ismail Farooqui v. Union of India, the mosque, the shrine, the graveyard has been defined completely.
03:25 And in that context, Gyanvapi is not a mosque in any way.
03:30 Second thing, in 1936, the case of Deen Muhammad was filed, 12 witnesses passed and everyone accepted that there is continuous worship there.
03:41 And in that same place, in the same Gyanvapi, the Vyas family has been continuously worshipping.
03:48 And then in 1983, the Kashi Vishwanath Adhiniyam, according to that, the area of Panchkosh, the entire area of Adi Vishwaswar, Kashi Vishwanath is included.
04:04 In this way, the entire heritage of Kashi Vishwanath Ji.
04:09 And then I come, worship has been there until November 1993.
04:16 And this worship, the presence of the mosque in the area of Sringar Gauri, has been there.
04:22 In this context, the mosque cannot be said there in any way.
04:27 [Hindi]
04:49 [Hindi]