Technology Companies in the U.S.-China Competition

  • 5 months ago
Can technology companies remain politically neutral in times of conflict?

In this episode of "Zoom In Zoom Out," TaiwanPlus reporter Joyce Tseng sits down with Jacob Helberg, a commissioner of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. We first zoom in on military uses of artificial intelligence before zooming out to look at how technology intersects with geopolitics.
Transcript
00:00 (upbeat music)
00:02 Welcome to Zoom In Zoom Out,
00:14 your global look at news from here in Taiwan and the region.
00:18 I'm Joyce Sun.
00:20 The US and China have been locked in fierce competition
00:24 and at the center of it is a race for tech supremacy.
00:27 Semiconductors are a well-covered aspect of this battle,
00:31 but other innovations like AI play a big part in this too.
00:35 To discuss the geopolitics of technology,
00:38 I spoke with Jacob Helberg,
00:40 a commissioner at the US-China Economic
00:42 and Security Review Commission.
00:44 He's also a senior policy advisor at Palantir,
00:48 a software company whose customers range
00:50 from public health institutes to the US Army.
00:53 For this interview, we began by zooming in on AI's role
00:57 in the US-China rivalry.
00:59 Here is the response from Jacob.
01:02 AI is really at the center of that rivalry.
01:04 If you think about the fact that the last time
01:06 the world experienced a major global war,
01:09 that was about 80 years ago.
01:11 80 years is the same amount of time that elapsed
01:14 between the US Civil War and World War II.
01:17 And just think about how different the world was
01:19 between those two worlds.
01:22 Those two wars were completely different.
01:24 And so I'm convinced that if another global war,
01:28 World War II erupt, it would look drastically different
01:32 than the last one.
01:33 And I worry that our policy makers are still very focused
01:37 on conventional methods.
01:39 One of the things that we're seeing is China is racing
01:42 to integrate AI at every layer of the kill chain.
01:46 We're already seeing AI being used for targeting.
01:49 We're seeing AI being integrated
01:53 to create recommendation engines
01:55 for battlefield decision makers.
01:57 But it's gonna be all-encompassing
01:59 and it's gonna dramatically change the face of warfare.
02:03 - With each, the US and China's tech capabilities
02:07 at the moment, what are you most worried about there?
02:10 - Well, there's a fundamental trade-off
02:12 that we're seeing in military AI particularly.
02:17 There's a trade-off between speed and human control.
02:21 In democracies, we're very comfortable
02:24 with humans being in the loop.
02:26 And we actually want humans to have input
02:29 on making the final call, pressing the button
02:34 when an attack is launched.
02:36 In autocracies, it's a much lower trust environment.
02:40 You're seeing that manifest itself
02:41 when Xi Jinping disappears his foreign minister,
02:44 when he disappears Hu Jintao at an annual gathering.
02:49 It's lower trust.
02:50 And so they are more likely to bias
02:53 in favor of more automated decision-making.
02:56 What that means is they are likely to move very fast,
02:59 but when you automate more things,
03:02 it also creates a higher degree of risk to make mistakes
03:05 because ultimately you're putting machines in control
03:08 and that means that you have less oversight.
03:10 And so right now in peacetime,
03:13 I think our policymakers are very much skewing
03:16 in favor of a lot of human oversight,
03:18 which is completely safe and understandable.
03:20 I think it's important to have the debate
03:23 about where we wanna land because ultimately
03:25 when you are at war, new pressures come in.
03:28 You have to respond to events in real time.
03:31 And if you're responding to an adversary
03:33 that's moving three times as fast as you,
03:36 you're gonna be under a lot of pressure
03:38 to move a lot of things over to automation.
03:41 - In your work in Washington,
03:42 what is your most immediate goal in your law being for AI?
03:47 - Yeah, I think we need national security
03:51 to be a fundamental organizing principle
03:54 in the debate around AI.
03:56 I think too much of the AI debate has focused
03:59 on a abstract concept of safety
04:02 that has been too disconnected from national security.
04:08 The reality is we don't live in a silo.
04:10 We live in a broad world where we have friends
04:13 and we have adversaries.
04:15 One of those adversaries is the People's Republic of China
04:18 that is racing ahead to integrate AI
04:21 into all of its systems.
04:24 They are all in from AI on the software side
04:28 to on the robotics side.
04:30 They announced that they wanna mass produce humanoids
04:32 by 2025.
04:33 And the decisions that we make necessarily
04:38 have to be based off of what we're seeing them do
04:42 on the other side because we have to stay competitive.
04:45 And so making sure that on the one hand,
04:48 we have a technology agenda that allows us
04:52 and a policy agenda that allows us to move
04:54 as fast as possible in the development
04:56 of artificial intelligence to maintain
04:58 and hopefully expand our lead,
05:01 while at the same time addressing and closing the loopholes
05:04 that our adversaries have exploited
05:07 that have allowed them to get access through back doors
05:10 to our most sensitive technologies.
05:12 - I'm curious about where Taiwan fits into this.
05:15 Obviously with chips, Taiwan is in this leading position.
05:20 The US is also trying to court Taiwanese chip makers
05:24 to American soil.
05:25 Other East Asian countries, Korea, Japan
05:27 are also looped into this US-China rivalry in tech.
05:31 Could you talk a little bit about how these other countries
05:35 fit into the picture when you're discussing these issues?
05:39 - I think two elements that really bind Silicon Valley
05:44 and Taiwan together in a close way is on the one hand,
05:49 I think a lot of people in Silicon Valley
05:51 who are animated by a passion for free speech
05:55 and democratic values feel genuinely passionate
05:59 to stand with Taiwan in its desire to remain free and open.
06:04 On the other hand, Silicon Valley is a world leader
06:09 in software, but it lacks the kind of hardware
06:14 manufacturing capacity that Taiwan has so much expertise in.
06:18 Silicon Valley can help the Taiwanese government
06:20 modernize and undertake important efforts
06:23 to modernize its defenses and think through the role
06:26 of emerging technologies and defense.
06:30 By the same token, Taiwan has undertaken
06:33 a lot of heavy lift already for its own security
06:36 to think through how can Taiwan have supply chains
06:41 that are free of CCP components.
06:44 And then lastly, as you pointed out earlier,
06:48 there's obviously a great deal of focus
06:51 on Taiwan's chips ecosystem.
06:54 It's no secret that in the US, we are absolutely seeing
06:59 a race in the development of artificial intelligence.
07:02 Within the US, there is a race between a number of companies
07:05 but ultimately there's a broader race
07:08 between the US and China.
07:10 And the access to the most advanced chips
07:13 is the fuel for that race.
07:16 And so making sure that Taiwan and Silicon Valley
07:21 work closely together to ensure that American companies
07:25 have access to the chips that they need
07:28 in order to move as fast as they can
07:31 is obviously something that's incredibly important as well.
07:35 (electronic music)
07:37 - And if I can, I guess, zoom out a little bit here,
07:40 you said before tech companies can't be neutral anymore.
07:45 What do you see for the future of tech's role in geopolitics
07:49 as you're saying it's having more of a role to play
07:53 in policymaking, things like that?
07:55 - Yeah, I think for too long,
07:58 technology companies have tried to be Switzerland
08:00 and what we're seeing is fundamentally
08:03 the realities of the world are such that
08:06 they can't be neutral between the US and China.
08:09 In China, you fundamentally have
08:11 a civil military fusion regime
08:13 that completely erases the distinction
08:17 between the private and the public sector.
08:20 And so it's very hard for technologies
08:23 to comply with two legal systems
08:25 that are fundamentally at odds and contradict each other.
08:28 You can't protect personal privacy in America
08:31 if ultimately you are answerable
08:34 to the Chinese Communist Party
08:36 that is predicated on total obedience
08:39 with the diktats from the CCP,
08:41 including handing over whatever information the CCP requests.
08:45 And so I do think we can call it de-risking,
08:49 we can call it a banana,
08:51 but fundamentally what we're talking about
08:53 is decoupling to a certain extent in the technology world
08:58 and I think that's a healthy thing.
09:00 It's a really big world out there
09:02 and there's more to this world than just China.
09:05 There's incredibly exciting opportunities here in Taiwan,
09:08 there are great opportunities in India
09:11 and so many different emerging markets
09:13 and I hope that our very industrious CEOs
09:16 in Silicon Valley see that and reach out
09:18 to so many of these exciting markets
09:22 that have emerging technology ecosystems,
09:25 an incredibly talented bench of engineers
09:29 and seize those opportunities.
09:31 - Taiwan, with social networks,
09:34 Taiwan was subject to unprecedented disinformation
09:37 during the election,
09:39 this is also a very important election year just globally
09:42 and also for the US.
09:44 Where do you see this trend
09:47 in terms of weaponizing information going
09:50 and what can be done about it?
09:53 - Part of what we're seeing is gray zone warfare
09:57 has become a pervasive and defining feature
10:00 of international politics
10:02 because new technologies have made it possible
10:06 for governments to compete and wage political warfare
10:10 in ways that are highly potent
10:12 below the conventional threshold of war.
10:15 It is hard to talk about Chinese election interference
10:19 and not talk about TikTok.
10:21 TikTok is completely controlled
10:23 by the Chinese Communist Party,
10:25 they control the algorithm, they flood the platform
10:28 with fake accounts to fire hose the platform
10:31 with their propaganda, pro-CCP propaganda.
10:35 And so ultimately, one of the fundamental dilemmas
10:39 that I see elected officials in the US
10:42 and around the world struggle with on the TikTok issue
10:45 is everyone knows it's a national security threat,
10:49 everyone understands it's totally controlled
10:51 by the Chinese Communist Party,
10:53 but they struggle with, you know,
10:55 are we gonna lose a generation of young people
10:57 if we ban it?
10:59 Are we losing an ability to reach out to young voters
11:02 and what if members of the opposing party
11:05 use TikTok in a more effective way
11:07 and they're reaching out to those voters?
11:09 Here's what I have to say to those elected officials
11:12 is if you are an elected official
11:15 that is concerned about the security of your country
11:17 and if you're critical of China,
11:19 you will not get promoted on TikTok.
11:23 If you're seeing young people move away from your party,
11:28 it's not because you're not reaching out to them on TikTok
11:31 and so my advice to policymakers is, you know,
11:35 focus on the long-term national security risks.
11:39 Your country will be much safer
11:41 if you take action on this now rather than wait.
11:44 India did it a few years ago.
11:45 They're growing at 9%, they're doing great
11:48 and I think democracy should do the right thing,
11:52 should do what's right for their countries
11:54 and ultimately remove CCP control from TikTok.
11:59 - China's recent Boao Forum,
12:01 they're now reiterating this, you know,
12:04 China's open to do business
12:07 and since APEC, Xi Jinping meeting
12:10 with all the CEOs in San Francisco,
12:12 what do you make of this messaging?
12:15 Does that affect your efforts in Washington?
12:18 - Yeah, so my, look, what I would say is
12:22 it's very nice that Xi Jinping and his diplomats
12:25 are having a much softer approach.
12:28 I think everyone remembers very clearly
12:30 when all of these Chinese diplomats
12:33 were playing warrior wolf diplomacy,
12:36 you know, just three years ago,
12:38 particularly during COVID
12:41 and so what I would tell every member
12:43 of the business community is,
12:44 these diplomats are warrior wolves in sheep's clothing.
12:48 They, you know, are approaching them and playing nice
12:52 simply because they need foreign investment
12:54 to prop up their economy,
12:56 which is facing substantial headwinds
12:59 and ultimately, I think they need to live
13:00 with the consequences of their policy decisions.
13:03 I mean, they have waged aggression campaigns against India,
13:07 against the Philippines, against Taiwan,
13:10 unprecedented campaign to try to interfere
13:13 in Taiwan's election, intimidate Taiwanese officials.
13:17 So ultimately, I would say,
13:19 you're not gonna see, if you're a business person
13:22 trying to make a decision,
13:23 you're not gonna see an easing of tensions
13:26 between the US and China, regardless of who's president
13:30 and so, you know, I would encourage our members
13:33 of our fantastic business community
13:35 to look for other opportunities elsewhere
13:37 in emerging markets like Taiwan, like India,
13:41 Vietnam and so many other places.
13:43 - Thank you so much, Jacob.
13:45 - Thank you, no, it's great, great to do this.
13:47 Thank you, I really appreciate it.
13:49 (upbeat music)
13:51 - That was Jacob Helberg,
13:59 Senior Policy Advisor at Palantir
14:02 and a Commissioner at the US-China Economic
14:05 and Security Review Commission.
14:07 And this has been Zoom In Zoom Out.
14:09 For more stories from Taiwan Plus News,
14:11 please follow us on social media.
14:13 Thank you for joining us and we'll see you next time.
14:15 (upbeat music)
14:18 (upbeat music)
14:20 (upbeat music)
14:23 (upbeat music)
14:26 (upbeat music)
14:28 (upbeat music)
14:39 (upbeat music)
14:42 (upbeat music)
14:44 (upbeat music)
14:47 (upbeat music)
14:50 (upbeat music)
14:52 (upbeat music)
14:55 (bell chimes)
14:58 [BLANK_AUDIO]

Recommended