八点最热报 | 华裔青年卓伟隆因为拿“真主字眼袜子”事件开玩笑被定罪之后，向高庭提出上诉。而高庭今天推翻了地庭的这项裁决，指示地庭重新审讯。高庭究竟是基于什么原因驳回裁决呢？之前判的刑罚哪里出了问题呢？如果最终的审讯结果和判决和之前的不同，被告卓伟隆又可以怎样做呢？（主播：颜江瀚）
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00 Before watching the video, I remind you that there is more content on the Hotpoint website.
00:05 In the KK convenience store socks wave,
00:08 because he made fun of the "real" pair of self-made socks on social media,
00:12 which caused netizens to be dissatisfied and asked him to publicly apologize,
00:16 Zhuo Weilong admitted to Diting earlier and was sentenced to six months in prison and fined 12,000 RMB.
00:22 However, after Zhuo Weilong, he filed a lawsuit,
00:25 and Gao Ting overturned Diting's ruling today,
00:28 and ordered Diting to re-interrogate.
00:31 What was the reason for Gao Ting's re-interrogation?
00:35 What was the problem with the previous sentence?
00:39 If the final trial result and verdict are different from the previous one,
00:44 what can the defendant Zhuo Weilong do?
00:46 For this case,
00:48 the professional lawyer Zheng Yihua pointed out when he was interviewed by 8.4 Daily that
00:51 generally, when the defendant faces a charge,
00:54 if he admits his crime,
00:56 the local judge will read the content of the charge and the sentence to the defendant.
01:02 However, according to the judge Gao Ting who investigated Zhuo Weilong's case,
01:06 there was a flaw in the process of Diting's interrogation.
01:10 It was not recorded whether Zhuo Weilong clearly stated that he understood the charge and sentence after admitting his crime.
01:17 In addition, Zhuo Weilong did not appoint a lawyer to defend or explain the situation at the time.
01:23 Therefore, Zhuo Weilong's right was not protected.
01:26 Because of this, Gao Ting decided to revoke the verdict
01:30 and hand the case to another Diting to re-interrogate.
01:33 As for Gao Ting's decision to revoke the verdict,
01:36 Zheng Yihua also thought that Diting made some technical errors in the basic interrogation process.
01:42 The judge Gao Ting only revoked the verdict because there were problems in the judicial procedure.
01:48 It had nothing to do with whether Zhuo Weilong's earlier sentence was too heavy or too light.
01:55 After Gao Ting's interrogation,
02:00 she found that there were some technical errors in the process of the defendant's confession in the local court.
02:07 As a result, the defendant's legal rights were not fully protected.
02:12 Although the defendant admitted his crime,
02:14 before he confessed, the local court and the prosecutor in charge of the case
02:20 were responsible for ensuring that the defendant knew what kind of problems he was facing
02:26 and what the criminal proceedings would be.
02:28 The record of the case must be clear.
02:30 To put it simply,
02:32 the word "confession" must be in the record of the entire court.
02:36 The judge Gao Ting was also very cautious.
02:38 She also reviewed all the records in the court and found that there was no such record.
02:44 Only because of this reason, the court was able to revoke the verdict.
02:48 The young Chinese Zhuo Weilong,
02:50 after being convicted of the "confession" incident,
02:52 filed a complaint with the court.
02:54 The court's judge, based on the fact that the court was reading the charges and the verdict,
02:58 did not have Zhuo Weilong's most important "I understand" statement.
03:01 Therefore, the court decided to revoke the verdict and re-interrogate the court.
03:05 The professional lawyer, Zheng Yihua, pointed out that
03:08 in addition to the technical errors in the case,
03:11 the court would also base it on the lack of evidence, incomplete charges,
03:14 or the fact that the prosecutor did not re-interrogate the defendant after the change of charges,
03:19 and therefore revoked the verdict.
03:21 However, she also believes that this case was a waste of taxpayers' money and time.
03:27 According to the news,
03:29 Judge Gao Ting did remind all the judges and all the law enforcement officers in the legal system
03:37 to follow the procedure strictly
03:41 to ensure that this kind of mistake would not happen again.
03:44 Because you are wasting taxpayers' money and time.
03:47 Because of some technical issues,
03:49 the defendant must be transferred to another court to be re-interrogated.
03:56 What does "re-interrogation" mean?
03:58 The defendant will face the same "confessions" again.
04:01 After the judge understands the verdict,
04:04 the judge will make a choice again whether to confess or not.
04:07 In other words, all the previous actions were not effective.
04:11 As the case needs to be re-interrogated,
04:14 it is not yet certain whether Zhuo will be convicted.
04:17 The Justice Department pointed out that
04:19 if the defendant has already paid a fine of RMB12,000,
04:21 there is still a chance that Zhuo will be convicted.
04:25 If she chooses to confess again,
04:27 because the judge is different now,
04:29 it seems that the judge's verdict at that time
04:32 was that Zhuo was convicted.
04:34 If the verdict was also RMB12,000,
04:36 she might be released on the spot.
04:38 If she chooses to resist the verdict,
04:40 that is, she chooses not to confess,
04:42 the case will be tried.
04:44 Because she did not have a legal representative before,
04:46 now she has a legal representative.
04:48 When the case is tried,
04:50 many people will ask,
04:52 "What did she do when she was in jail?"
04:54 After the final result of the trial,
04:56 if she is innocent,
04:58 she has the right to sue the government of China
05:01 for her involvement in the jailing and fining.
05:05 If she is still convicted,
05:08 the judge will apply the sentence
05:10 she has received before
05:12 to make a reasonable judgment.
05:15 Thanks for watching!
05:18 The End
05:21 The End
05:24 The End
05:26 [BLANK_AUDIO]