This Was The Prosecution Told The Jury In Their Opening Statement At Trump's NYC Hush Money Trial

  • 5 months ago
On "Forbes Newsroom," attorney Jon-Jorge Aras spoke to Forbes Senior Law Editor Liane Jackson about the prosecution's argument to the jury in opening statements at former President Trump's NYC hush money trial.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00 Donald Trump is facing a 34 count indictment for falsifying business records and opening
00:07 statements began last week.
00:08 They chose the jury.
00:10 That was also a tumultuous time, but we had opening statements that didn't last particularly
00:15 long, about half an hour each.
00:17 Can you tell us a little bit about the prosecution and what they laid out to the jury?
00:24 Because they are setting the stage for the rest of this case.
00:26 And they were talking about this being a case, not just a hush money trial, which is the
00:31 term we keep hearing over and over, this hush money case, but they want to frame this as
00:36 about illegal election interference at a criminal conspiracy.
00:40 Can you talk a little bit more about that and what they told the jury?
00:44 Absolutely.
00:45 So the prosecution today got the opportunity to explain their narrative and lay out their
00:51 case and what they plan to prove throughout this process.
00:54 And it really breaks down into two areas.
00:56 The first area is the falsification of business records.
01:00 That's the underlying alleged crime, which is a misdemeanor that they're alleging former
01:06 President Trump did by recording entries of retainer payments to his attorney, Michael
01:11 Cohen, as retainer payments, as opposed to payments specifically for Stormy Daniels.
01:19 That's one part of it.
01:20 The second part of it is more broad ranging.
01:22 It has to do with a criminal conspiracy that former President Trump conspired with the
01:29 National Enquirer to go out and stop negative stories from being run against him with the
01:37 goal ultimately of interfering with the 2016 election.
01:42 And that interference allegedly would have been to stop negative press from coming out
01:47 that would be shielded from the public so they couldn't make ultimately an informed
01:52 decision on the candidate, former President Trump.
01:56 So it's broken down into two parts.
01:58 The first part is fairly straightforward.
02:01 The second part is a little bit more broad ranging and a conspiracy will have to involve,
02:07 obviously, more than one individual.
02:10 So it's going to have to be a minimum two people up to a larger group that agreed to
02:17 commit a criminal act.

Recommended