Justice Amy Coney Barrett questioned Joshua Turner, attorney for Idaho's Office of the Attorney General, during Wednesday’s oral arguments in Moyle v. United States & Idaho v. United States.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00 I guess I don't really understand why we have to address the stabilizing condition if what
00:06 you say is that nobody has been able to identify a conflict.
00:11 And on the mental health thing, the SG says, I just picked it up to check footnote five,
00:16 Idaho badly airs and asserting that construing MTALA according to its terms would turn emergency
00:22 rooms into federal abortion enclaves by allowing pregnancy termination for mental health concerns.
00:28 So if that's the only space that you can identify where Idaho would preclude an abortion and
00:34 MTALA would require one and the government is saying, no, that's not so what's the conflict?
00:40 Well, you know, I mean, of course we think we win whether you find no factual conflict
00:47 and therefore the injunction.
00:48 Why are you here?
00:49 I mean, you know, the government says, hold on a second.
00:54 You're here because there's an injunction precluding you from enforcing your law.
00:59 And if your law can fully operate because MTALA doesn't curb Idaho's authority to enforce
01:06 its law.
01:07 Well, I can't under the injunction because the injunction says that Idaho's law is preempted
01:12 in an incredibly broad range of circumstances to avoid as it conflicts with MTALA.
01:16 I thought it is much broader than that.
01:19 And this was based on the proffered injunction by the administration to avoid an emergency
01:26 medical condition, not in the face of an emergency medical condition.
01:29 So what that means is Idaho's law can't even operate when a doctor determines that a condition
01:34 might need to be avoided that hasn't yet presented itself.
01:37 That's far broader than the emergency medical condition and stabilization requirement under
01:41 MTALA because the stabilization requirement under MTALA is only triggered when there has
01:46 been a determination.
01:47 Okay, well, I would like to hear the Solicitor General's response to that.
01:52 But let me just ask you one other thing about the mental health consideration because I
01:56 can, I can understand Idaho's point that a mental health exception would be far broader
02:01 than Idaho law and have the potential to expand the availability of abortion far beyond what
02:06 Idaho law permits.
02:07 But the stabilization requirement only exists up until transfer, right?
02:13 Until transfer is possible.
02:14 So it's hard for me to see how with a mental health condition that couldn't be stabilized
02:20 before needing to transfer, right?
02:22 At that point, the Idaho hospital could say, well, you're stable.
02:26 You're not immediately going to be suicidal.
02:28 We'll leave you in the care of a parent or partner who will then seek appropriate treatment.
02:34 Well, that flexible view of stabilization is very different than the government's very
02:39 rigid view of stabilization, which is if an emergency medical condition calls for an abortion,
02:45 it's got to be provided right there and then if it's available in this very limited sense.
02:49 And so the stabilization continuum that you're talking about, I agree, that's built into
02:54 MTALA.
02:55 The statute says until transfer is possible.
02:57 Well, the transfer provision kicks in if a hospital is unable to stabilize a condition.
03:02 And so if a patient presents at a hospital and that hospital has the capability, the
03:07 availability to stabilize a condition, in the case of mental health, I invite General
03:12 Prelogger to come up here and tell you that I've got it all wrong and that, you know,
03:16 the mother that I described would not need to receive stabilization in that circumstance
03:20 and instead would be transferred to a psychiatric hospital or something and that wouldn't constitute
03:24 dumping under their reading.
03:25 I just don't see how that comports with everything they've said about the rigid view of stabilization,
03:31 that if a condition calls for it and a hospital can do it, it's got to be done there and then.
03:35 Does Idaho have any kind of conscience exemption for doctors under state law?
03:40 It does and there are federal conscience protections as well and I think that is a key point here,
03:45 Your Honor.
03:46 The administration told this court in the FDA case that individual doctors are never
03:52 required to perform an abortion, from what I could tell, but that doesn't extend to hospitals.
03:55 And so in the case of Catholic hospitals, and there are hundreds of them treating billions
04:00 of patients every year, under the administration's reading, Catholic hospitals who faithfully
04:04 adhere to the ethical and religious directives are now required to perform abortions.
04:08 Is that because no federal conscience exemption applies?
04:12 I don't know why they say that's the line that they draw between individual doctors
04:17 and religious institutions because Coach Snow, on his face, seems to cover both.
04:23 Okay, thank you.