‘I’m Intrigued’: Sean Casten Questions Administrator Bill Nelson About NASA’s TEMPO Mission

  • 4 months ago
During a House Science, Space & Technology Committee hearing on Tuesday, Rep. Sean Casten (D-IL) questioned NASA Administrator Bill Nelson about NASA’s TEMPO Mission.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00 Thank you very much.
00:02 And I'd like to recognize the gentleman from Illinois, Mr. Kasten.
00:06 Thank you, Mr. Acting Chair, and thank you, Mr. Administrator, for being here.
00:11 I want to chat a little bit about the TEMPO mission that you've got underway.
00:16 If I understand this right, and correct me if I've got this wrong, geosynchronous monitoring
00:20 North America and sort of hourly neighborhood level granularity.
00:24 Am I about right on that, of the monitoring capability it's going to have?
00:29 Just one second.
00:32 This is the mission that's monitoring local pollutants in the atmosphere.
00:38 Well, it is one of the ones that is doing that.
00:44 And what we are trying to understand, all these different things that affect our climate,
00:52 such as dust, such as aerosols, such as the changing of the elevation of oceans and fresh
01:05 water, all of these missions are designed on some particular aspect of then putting
01:13 it all together in a 3D composite.
01:19 And I'm totally supportive of the mission.
01:22 I guess my first question is just, is that going to be the highest temporal and spatial
01:29 resolution we're going to have on this level of monitoring, at least from a space-based
01:33 system?
01:34 Well, it is the next iteration.
01:38 But we'll get even more sophisticated as we go on.
01:43 And will the data that comes out of that be publicly available, or is there any concern
01:48 about – I mean, I could think of national security reasons why you might not – we
01:51 might want to be a little cautious about a particular plume.
01:54 I could also imagine reasons why the private sector might be reluctant.
01:58 So what's going to be the process for that data being made available to the public?
02:01 It's available.
02:03 Okay.
02:04 In real time, as it's released?
02:05 Well, there'll be a lag of some seconds as it comes back to Earth.
02:13 Okay.
02:14 That's cool.
02:17 Is there the potential to do that globally?
02:23 And I'm thinking about things like several years ago there was this concern about hydrofluorocarbon
02:28 leaks from China that were violating international treaties.
02:33 And I would imagine from a national security perspective, if we had the ability to pinpoint
02:38 where that leak was coming from at a specific point – it might be in our national interest;
02:42 the Chinese might have been reluctant – is there the potential to make this global, or
02:46 does that create some diplomatic problems?
02:48 Global.
02:49 Global.
02:50 Okay.
02:51 Just like what I mentioned earlier, we have one up there called EMET.
02:56 It was going to look at dust coming off of the Sahara.
03:02 Lo and behold, unexpectedly, it can pinpoint very specifically methane leaks.
03:11 Oh, wow.
03:12 And that's global.
03:13 So you are going to be monitoring methane from this as well?
03:16 Absolutely.
03:17 Okay.
03:18 It's already happening.
03:19 Well, you're reading my mind, and I'm intrigued, and let us know how we can continue
03:25 to help this.
03:26 I'm – a part of what I'm thinking about on this is that we are going down the path
03:33 to have global methane monitoring, global methane tracking as a climate-forcing compound
03:39 in the atmosphere.
03:40 We know that methane leak rates exceed what is documented, right?
03:46 If you look at, like, the balance on natural gas extraction and what's sold, we know
03:50 there's a gap that's bigger.
03:52 And it's really hard to pinpoint exactly who's responsible.
03:56 To the extent that this has the ability to get granular and temporal, I would assume
04:02 that this starts to be something where we can look and say, okay, this specific entity
04:05 at this time of day was operating in that location, and so we have some accountability.
04:10 Will that data then be – I guess, what's the plan to coordinate with other agencies
04:15 on the use of this data?
04:18 It is available and it also is very specific.
04:24 This is what was such a pleasant surprise about the spacecraft EMAP.
04:33 We can pinpoint methane emissions now so specifically that, for example, if there's
04:44 a real polluter, we've got the evidence, but what we find out is that some industries
04:51 don't even know that they are emitting methane.
04:56 And so this is valuable information for that industry to be able to stop it.
05:02 And methane, of course, is one of the major greenhouse gases.
05:08 That's with –
05:09 And carbon dioxide.
05:10 No, it's precisely why I asked the question.
05:12 We were up in Alaska last year and looking at permafrost melt and how you figure out
05:17 where the global balance goes and how you track all that.
05:19 Well, that's fascinating.
05:20 Happy to have you here, proud to have you here, and look forward to working with you
05:25 to make sure that we can continue to expand these programs.
05:27 Yield back.
05:27 [BLANK_AUDIO]

Recommended