'Would Remove Critical Gun Safety Protections': Jerry Nadler Slams Concealed Firearm Bill

4 months ago

During a House Judiciary Committee markup hearing, Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) spoke in opposition a bill that would allow law enforcement officers to carry a concealed firearm while off duty or retired in certain federal facilities and across state lines.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript

Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Transcript

00:00 Mr. Chairman, the Oliosa Reform Act would remove critical gun safety protections from

00:06 the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act, or Oliosa, which became law in 2004.

00:11 To understand just how problematic this bill is, it is helpful to revisit a little bit

00:17 of history from the Committee's past.

00:19 Under a Republican majority, the Committee report on Oliosa began by explaining that,

00:24 quote, "A state has traditionally, in the exercise of its sovereignty, controlled who

00:29 within its borders may carry concealed weapons and when law enforcement officers may carry

00:34 firearms."

00:35 Close quote.

00:36 The report explained that Oliosa would override virtually all state laws on concealed carry.

00:41 It would supplant the judgment of the states about the appropriate use of firearms by off-duty

00:46 and retired law enforcement, both for their own agencies and for the law enforcement agencies

00:50 of every other state, and would force states to allow these individuals to carry concealed

00:55 firearms within their borders.

00:57 The Republican chairman of the Committee at the time, Jim Sensenbrenner, began the markup

01:02 of the bill by saying, quote, "It is no secret that I am opposed to this legislation.

01:07 I believe it violates the principles of federalism and undermines the authorities of the states.

01:12 This legislation would disregard the judgment of state authorities on what many believe

01:17 is an important public safety issue."

01:19 Close quote.

01:20 I agreed with those sentiments, and we both opposed the legislation.

01:25 I also explained that the bill created the problem by allowing nationwide concealed carry

01:29 by off-duty and retired law enforcement without any national standard for training.

01:35 New York City could require one level of training, while a small rural city with very different

01:40 needs and a very different approach to policing could require a very different level of training.

01:45 And yet each would be forced to allow the others off-duty and retired officers to carry

01:50 concealed firearms within their community and potentially even in interactions with

01:55 their own on-duty law enforcement.

01:57 The International Association of Chiefs of Police, or IACP, opposed this legislation

02:03 too because they were concerned about how it could endanger law enforcement and could

02:07 lead to situations in which officers from one jurisdiction are killed or injured by

02:14 local police who cannot distinguish between a criminal and a retired officer using a firearm.

02:20 The Police Executive Research Forum, or PERF, opposed the bill because it could put police

02:25 agencies at risk for liability for an officer who misuses a weapon in another state and

02:33 because the requirements for retired officers were insufficient.

02:37 For all of these reasons, I joined former Chairman Sensenbrenner and other members from

02:41 both sides of the aisle in opposing LEOSA.

02:44 Unfortunately, it became law despite our objections.

02:47 Importantly, the law included exceptions for special places like government buildings,

02:53 gun-free school zones, and private property.

02:56 These exceptions have been in place for 20 years and have served as important protections.

03:01 But this bill tosses those exceptions out the window.

03:05 This bill eviscerates the rights of states to control the concealed carrying of weapons

03:11 even in places where a state has a special interest in retaining control of its gun safety

03:16 laws and where Congress has protected that interest for 20 years.

03:21 It forces states to allow off-duty and retired officers to carry firearms on playgrounds,

03:27 government buildings, and on buses, trains, subways, and boats.

03:32 It reduces the rights of private property owners, including individuals and organizations,

03:37 who may not want concealed weapons on their property.

03:40 It undermines state laws limiting magazine capacity by allowing some people to carry

03:45 large-capacity magazines even when a state has prohibited them.

03:50 It relaxes training standards so that some people will be able to carry a concealed firearm

03:55 even though it has been three years since their last firearms training certification.

04:01 Not only does this bill infringe on the rights of states and private property owners, but

04:05 it also unravels federal laws that have kept firearms out of federal facilities.

04:10 It does this for federal facilities that are "open to the public" and that are classified

04:15 as "facility security level 1 or 2."

04:20 This definition will create significant confusion for those trying to abide by it and for those

04:25 tasked with enforcing it.

04:26 If a federal facility is only partially open to the public or only open to the public during

04:32 certain hours, does it fall within the bill's definition?

04:37 We don't know.

04:39 What about a facility that is open to the public so long as they are not carrying firearms?

04:45 The bill does not say.

04:47 As the bill itself states, the facility's security level is determined on a facility-by-facility

04:52 basis and may not be publicly posted, so it is virtually impossible to know what federal

04:58 facilities are included in this definition.

05:01 We looked for a listing of federal facilities that are classified at these security levels,

05:06 and we could not find one.

05:08 Others may even have offices in federal facilities that will suddenly be forced to allow concealed

05:12 firearms in their doors as a result of this legislation.

05:17 I was proud to join my Republican colleague, former Chairman Sensenbrenner, in opposing

05:21 the original LEOSA.

05:23 He recognized that it undermines states' careful determinations on how best to protect

05:27 their citizens from gun violence.

05:30 This bill is an even further intrusion on their ability to make their own judgments

05:34 about public safety, concealed firearms, and the regulation of their own law enforcement.

05:38 For all these reasons, I urge my colleagues to join me in opposing this misguided and

05:44 poorly crafted legislation.

05:45 I yield back the balance of my time.

'Would Remove Critical Gun Safety Protections': Jerry Nadler Slams Concealed Firearm Bill

Category

Transcript

Recommended