State Dept Spox Grilled: Is The US ‘Comfortable Sending This Many Weapons’ With IDF 'Mistakes'

  • 5 months ago
During a press briefing on Tuesday, State Department Spokesperson Matthew Miller answered reporter questions on US weapons deal with Israel.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00 - Matt, so, I mean, there has been a lot of mistakes like this, correct?
00:07 I just, first, let me establish, does the United States believe that Israel, what happened
00:13 over the weekend was a result of a mistake?
00:16 - So we are going to wait to see the full results of the investigation.
00:19 We've seen, as I said, the preliminary investigation where Israel has claimed, Israel has said
00:23 that they've used the smallest bomb available to them to go after a very precise target.
00:29 This wasn't a 500-pound bomb or a 2,000-pound bomb, I think it was like a 37-kilogram or
00:36 37-pound bomb, a much smaller weapon designed to hit one site 1.7 kilometers away from the
00:44 Mawassi area where they have told civilians to move.
00:48 Now, that said, clearly something happened, and what happened, we've seen Israel's claim
00:55 that it might have been the results of hitting a Hamas ammo depot.
00:58 It's not clear to me that they actually know, but they need to find out, they need to conduct
01:02 the investigation, and we're gonna eagerly await the investigation and press them to
01:06 make sure that the results of that investigation are presented openly and transparently to
01:11 us and to the world.
01:12 - Right, so if we take the initial statement, Netanyahu said it was a tragic mistake, there
01:20 has been a lot of headlines with those same comments, right?
01:25 All central kitchen killings were also a tragic mistake.
01:29 There was another one late last year on Magazi camp that Israel has also called a mistake.
01:35 Those are the two that comes to mind.
01:37 There are, I can find numerous other incidents.
01:40 Is the United States comfortable sending this many weapons to an army that seems to be making
01:48 a series of mistakes?
01:50 - So let me say this, we are not comfortable with the loss of civilian life in any way,
01:55 shape, or form, and I think we have made that quite clear.
01:58 Number two, with respect to each of these incidents, it's important to find out what
02:03 happened, why it happened, and who was at fault.
02:05 And so it's important that this investigation proceed before we make any assessments that
02:10 will help you answer that question.
02:12 We've seen preliminary results, we wanna see the full results.
02:15 That said, and I'll say in previous investigations, for example, with the World Central Kitchen,
02:20 investigation strike, Israel did conduct an investigation and presented those findings
02:25 publicly and then made changes in response to those findings, which we thought it was
02:29 very important that they do.
02:31 This seems to be a very different kind of strike, whereas in the World Central Kitchen,
02:35 they made a mistake about what the target was, and they thought they were targeting
02:38 Hamas terrorists and they were not.
02:39 That was a very clear mistake.
02:40 In this instance, they were targeting what seems to be legitimate targets, and they were
02:44 successful in taking out those targets.
02:47 And then, likely as a result, there was this fire that broke out, it's not clear how it
02:52 was ignited, especially, as I said, when it's over a kilometer and a half from the location
02:56 of the strike.
02:57 We need to find out how that happened.
02:59 And if there are procedures that they need to put in place to prevent it from happening
03:03 again, we expect them to put those procedures in place.
03:06 When it comes to our policy, we have made clear that we oppose any full-scale military
03:10 operation and that what the ramifications to our policy would be of them launching such
03:15 an operation in Rafaq.
03:16 We haven't seen them do that yet.
03:18 But as I said, it is something that we are watching every day and are in communication
03:22 with them every day.
03:23 Right.
03:24 But in – sorry, a couple of more things.
03:27 In terms of the accountability measures, you say that after the WCK attack, there has been
03:32 some changes.
03:33 But if we look at other incidents, the killing of Shereen Abu Akhlai, for example, and there
03:40 has been a series of different incidents that involved a large amount of killings of civilians,
03:48 it doesn't look like the accountability measures are reprimanding certain forces.
03:53 Are those really enough for the United States?
03:56 I mean, we're talking about, like, the death of actual people here.
04:01 We're talking about loss of life.
04:03 Is the United States comfortable that several soldiers here and there are reprimanded?
04:09 But what seems to continue to happen is there is a pattern of behavior, and that doesn't
04:15 get to change in a large scale.
04:17 Are you okay with that?
04:18 So what we expect Israel to do is the same thing that we expect of our own military and
04:23 the same thing that we expect of all our democratic allies and partners.
04:27 We expect when people inside their military make mistakes or when they operate outside
04:35 of compliance with their own rules of engagement or they operate outside of compliance with
04:41 international humanitarian law, we expect them to fully investigate what happened.
04:45 We expect them to make changes to policy if changes to policy need to be made, and we
04:49 expect them to hold people accountable if accountability is appropriate.
04:53 Now, with respect to the premise of your question, we're still in the middle of a conflict, and
04:57 they have a number of investigations open, including criminal investigations into people
05:02 who potentially violated international humanitarian law or violated Israeli law or violated the
05:08 IDF's code of conduct.
05:09 So I think it's too early to draw any broad-sweeping assessments about that question.
05:15 Investigations take time, and it's important that they run their course, but it's important
05:18 that if accountability is merited, that accountability is what takes place, and we will be crystal
05:25 clear with the government of Israel about their obligations to meet those standards.

Recommended