Sparks Fly After Ann Wagner And CFPB Director Trade Blows Over Credit Card Fee Regulations

  • 3 months ago
During a House Financial Services Committee hearing Thursday, Rep. Ann Wagner (R-MO) spoke about a regulation on fees for late credit card payments.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Ms. Wagner is now recognized for 5 minutes.
00:02Hi. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
00:05Good morning, Director Chopra.
00:08Yeah, let's talk some truth, and let's do it quickly
00:11with brief answers because I have a lot of questions here.
00:14Do you believe, sir, financial institutions should engage
00:17in risk-based pricing when making loans to their customers?
00:23I don't think we should force it,
00:25but I think they often do because it's appropriate.
00:28Should they or should they not?
00:29Risk-based pricing when making loans?
00:32Simple yes or no.
00:32Again, I'm trying to answer.
00:33It's not to order them, but it is appropriate for them
00:37to be able to measure risk.
00:39Yes, they have to measure risk in order to give a loan.
00:41Good. The credit card late fees
00:43and overdraft rules will make it harder for lenders
00:47to price loans according to the risk involved.
00:51Why is the CFPB writing rules
00:54that erode the fundamental principle of risk-based pricing?
00:58Actually, won't it encourage better risk-based pricing?
01:01I'm not sure why making late fees in line
01:05with the congressional prohibition would undermine
01:07risk-based pricing.
01:08In fact, risk-based pricing, they have the data they need
01:12to price it more effectively.
01:14So I actually don't follow at all.
01:16Then answer this, yes or no.
01:18Yes or no, is there a strong likelihood
01:21that by drastically reducing the fee for paying late,
01:27this rule will actually encourage more consumers
01:30to pay their credit card bill late?
01:32Well, aren't you, I hope you're aware that credit cards...
01:34Answers yes or no.
01:36No, because credit card companies have the ability
01:40to raise your interest rates if you're late.
01:42They have the ability to earn a credit report.
01:44It will not encourage more consumers
01:46to pay their credit card late, really.
01:48No, no, no, you're forcing me to say yes or no
01:50and not allowing me to clarify.
01:51So I like to get...
01:52I'm going to clarify.
01:54Really, if the point of the late fee rule
01:58is to reduce the penalty from $32 to $8,
02:04won't it be cheaper for the consumer to pay late?
02:08No, so you are allowed to charge a late fee
02:10in excess of $8.
02:13The financial institutions needs to show their math.
02:15The CARD Act bans unreasonable late fees.
02:20We have a staff, we are using an old formula
02:22to help them do that.
02:24They will still be able, don't worry,
02:26to punish their customers for paying late.
02:30All right, let's talk about
02:31the CP's most recent CARD Act report.
02:35It defines the term persistent debt
02:39as a consumer paying more for interest and fees on a loan
02:43than they are paying toward the principal
02:46in a given calendar year.
02:47And given that the credit card late fees rule
02:51will undoubtedly result in more consumers paying late,
02:55we're dropping it from $32 to $8,
02:57and therefore getting deeper into debt,
03:00isn't it true that your late fee rulemaking
03:03will cause persistent debt to increase?
03:08Well, I guess I'd say this.
03:09Wouldn't you think that if a financial institution
03:12then raised the minimum payment,
03:15that person would then pay more,
03:17but they would be less likely to be in persistent debt?
03:20Director, your own rule indicates
03:22that more cardholders will pay late.
03:26Your rule indicates that more card payers will pay late.
03:29I think you're taking that out of context,
03:31but certainly we want to make sure
03:34that the congressional prohibition respectfully
03:36that bans unreasonable fees has fidelity.
03:40Will you commit to measuring the impact
03:42of the proposed rule on persistent debt,
03:45and then require that the rule be rescinded if it does?
03:49Well, it would be illegal for us
03:51to require rescission in that way,
03:53but certainly in our biennial card act reports,
03:56we will always seek to study all of these-
03:59You are encouraging persistent debt,
04:02and encouraging people to pay late.
04:05We're encouraging common sense.
04:06Well, let's go further.
04:08As part of the fee schedule charged by the CFPB
04:11for a FOIA request, the CFPB charges $23 per 15 minutes,
04:16or $92 per hour if professional staff
04:20conducts a search for information,
04:23which may be a rate set
04:25by the Office of Management and Budget.
04:27$92 per hour to search for documents seems pretty darn high,
04:32and very similar in concept to your definition of junk fee,
04:37which again, you defined as one in which the fee
04:39exceeds the CFPB's cost of searching,
04:43and therefore leads to profit for the CFPB.
04:46Will the CFPB take action to examine this junk fee,
04:51and reduce the amount charged for FOIA requests
04:54instead of profiting off of hardworking Americans
04:59who are simply seeking to learn about
05:01how government decisions are made within the opaque CFPB?
05:06Yeah, I actually think those have only been charged
05:09two or three times in the past few years.
05:11It's very rare, but I will look at that.
05:13It is not very rare, sir.
05:15Mr. General, women's time is up,
05:16and Dr. Chopra. I don't think actually.

Recommended