#khawarghumman #haidernaqvi #hassanayub #chaudhryghulamhussain
"Agar 8 february kay Elections Fraud Hain to opposition leader Assembly main American Ambassador kiyu Milte Hain" Haider Naqvi Raises big Question
"Agar 8 february kay Elections Fraud Hain to opposition leader Assembly main American Ambassador kiyu Milte Hain" Haider Naqvi Raises big Question
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Yes, Mr. Ghulam Singh, the matter is still the same.
00:05The remarks that we heard today,
00:07it is obvious that the case will be heard again on Thursday after a day's break.
00:11This is what is expected.
00:12Although it was expected that it would be concluded today,
00:15but now a day's break has been given.
00:18And all the parties have been told that if anyone wants to collect more documents,
00:23then let them do it.
00:24The decision is obvious.
00:26The matter is sub-judicial in the Supreme Court.
00:28The decision will be made.
00:30You heard today's hearing.
00:32You heard the judge's remarks.
00:34What is your comment on today's hearing?
00:39First of all, there is a divided opinion.
00:43This is one thing.
00:45Secondly, you tell me, the three of you,
00:48Mashallah, I respect you a lot and your opinions are very much important,
00:54to me at least.
00:56You tell me, the decision that the Election Commission has made this time,
01:02that the seats of Sunni Atheism have been snatched from them,
01:07and divided among them,
01:09that the one who has one seat has been given five,
01:11and the one who has two seats has been given ten.
01:14These snatched seats,
01:16in which case has this happened in Pakistan before this?
01:19In which assembly?
01:22Yes, Mr. Naqvi, you heard the question.
01:25Obviously, the judge has asked the question.
01:27I will also comment on this.
01:29What are your thoughts on this matter?
01:33No, the decision has been made.
01:35They were taking back the seats that were given.
01:37The Supreme Court has made it clear that these seats are not theirs.
01:40And this is what we have been saying from the first day,
01:42at least I have been saying from the first day,
01:44that these seats are not of the Atheist Communities.
01:46And now we have to see what the Supreme Court's decision is,
01:49whether these are seats of the Sunni Atheist Council or not.
01:52And whatever the decision is,
01:54obviously, everyone will accept it,
01:56those who are following this case.
01:58This is one thing.
02:00But one more thing that you said in the intro,
02:03which you say again and again,
02:06this show talks a lot about the elections on 8th February,
02:09and it is said that this is an unjustified election,
02:12this is not an election, this is a fraud.
02:14We accept that this is a fraud.
02:17Tell me, those people who are sitting in the assembly,
02:19those 91 people,
02:21why don't they accept that this is a fraud?
02:23They are getting all the facilities from the assembly.
02:26They are getting equal salary from the assembly.
02:28The facilities that the assembly gives to an MNA,
02:31they are getting.
02:32There is an opposition leader there,
02:34he is enjoying all the privileges of the opposition leader.
02:37That opposition leader,
02:39there is an opposition leader in the assembly
02:41as an American ambassador.
02:43In the assembly, they also become members of the committees,
02:45they also get committees,
02:47they also get an accounts committee.
02:49So why don't those 91 people agree with us
02:52that the elections on 8th February were a fraud?
02:55This is my question to all of you.
02:57Let's go.
02:58Let's answer your question.
02:59Okay, Hassan Ayub,
03:00a very important point there today was that
03:03when the nomination papers were kept
03:05by the chief of the Zunidhaad council,
03:07Sabzabad,
03:08it was given in the IPW that,
03:10we have an alliance with PTI,
03:12if we don't get Balla,
03:13then you give me Sher-ul-Quaq and Burqa instead.
03:17On that,
03:18if I am not mistaken,
03:19Muneeb Akhtar has given a reference to section 266 again and again,
03:22that if we assume,
03:23they are saying that we have an alliance,
03:25after that the Supreme Court has decided that
03:27because the Zunidhaad council had an alliance,
03:29they did not get Balla,
03:31so after that,
03:32they said,
03:33why didn't you say to them that
03:35the Zunidhaad council's own symbol,
03:37why didn't you say to them that
03:39your alliance is over,
03:40because the alliance
03:41that you were going to fight in the elections,
03:43that is over.
03:45So,
03:46did you give them the horse,
03:47which was their basic symbol?
03:49Yes,
03:50after that,
03:51they have two more letters,
03:52they wrote letters.
03:53That was later,
03:54when they asked for reserve seats,
03:55that was later.
03:56No,
03:57no,
03:58they also said that
03:59they had written a letter to Nazriati,
04:00that was later.
04:01No,
04:02Nazriati was before the elections,
04:03Nazriati is not the post-election of the elections,
04:05it was before the elections.
04:07If you look at the dates,
04:09Nazriati's matter was over,
04:11when the decision of Balla was made,
04:13the chapter of Nazriati was closed,
04:15so they wrote a letter to Nazriati.
04:17And then,
04:18at the end,
04:19they said that
04:20you should make me independent.
04:22So,
04:23they got the tower as a symbol.
04:25Now,
04:26if we look at today's situation,
04:28then,
04:29Sikandar Basheer,
04:30who is the lawyer of the election commission,
04:32has clearly stated that
04:34zero plus two hundred
04:36is equal to zero.
04:38If you have secured a zero seat
04:40as a political party,
04:42then if you join
04:44two hundred independents
04:46or even three hundred independents,
04:48then your reserve seat will become zero.
04:50Secondly,
04:51you must have heard
04:52that the big millionaire of Kunsil,
04:54he said that
04:55a non-Muslim is in his constitution,
04:56that he cannot become a member.
04:58Secondly,
04:59this seemed very strange.
05:00Thirdly,
05:01in yesterday's meeting,
05:02I could not mention one thing,
05:03that in yesterday's meeting,
05:04Faisal Siddiqui
05:05and Salman Akram Raja
05:07did not even mention
05:09the Peshawar High Court.
05:11However,
05:12in the appeal,
05:13they came to the Supreme Court
05:14under Article 185-3,
05:16not 184,
05:17under Article 185-3.
05:18They came to the appeal.
05:19In this appeal,
05:20what order did they challenge?
05:22The order that was challenged,
05:23what is the impugn order?
05:24The impugn order is
05:25the decision of the Peshawar High Court.
05:27You are giving your own arguments.
05:28You are representing the Sunni Utaad Kunsil
05:30and you,
05:31who is Salman Akram Raja,
05:33you are representing Qawwal Shozab.
05:35You did not even mention it.
05:36And the most interesting thing
05:38was that of Justice Atal Munilla.
05:40He said a very right thing.
05:42He said that allegedly,
05:43like you said,
05:44human rights violations are taking place
05:46or the elections,
05:48in that,
05:49the Mubayna Dhandli has taken place.
05:51He did mention that.
05:53And when he asked
05:55Mr. Makhdoom Ali Khan,
05:57he said that
05:58why are these cases
05:59not being taken up?
06:00You have to answer this.
06:01I too, as a lawyer,
06:02cannot answer this.
06:03So, basically,
06:04what Mr. Mutalka was saying,
06:06those words were very appealing,
06:08but those words are not relevant to this case.
06:10They are not relevant to this case.
06:12They did not know about it.
06:13The one who is sitting in the full court,
06:16he is listening to the appeal
06:18against the decision of the Peshawar High Court.
06:20And after this decision,
06:21only one remedy will be available.
06:23After this appeal,
06:24there is no appeal.
06:25In the full court,
06:26you will only get the review.
06:27Okay, let's stick to our subject.
06:29There are so many things.
06:30So, obviously,
06:31there is an argument coming from both sides.
06:32Obviously,
06:33you were talking about Mr. Sikandar Basheer today.
06:35I was listening to him.
06:37When a question was asked by Muneeb Akhtar,
06:40then he said that
06:41this is above the Mufruziyah,
06:43I will not do it.
06:44But, actually,
06:45as far as the Election Act is concerned,
06:48I understood.
06:49I understood your argument.
06:50Article 51 of the Constitution
06:52will dominate the Election Act.