• 4 months ago
During remarks on the House Floor, made on Thursday, Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-CA) discussed California's ban on gas-powered cars.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Recordings to the public.
00:19Madam Speaker, following the testimony before our committee,
00:23the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee yesterday by Secretary of
00:27Transportation Pete Buttigieg, I am again calling for the Senate to pass legislation
00:34that has already passed this House to stop California from banning gas-powered vehicles.
00:41California has announced this ban, and now some 18 other states are going along with it,
00:46states that have linked their emissions policies to California. And the ban is set to go into effect
00:53by 2035. This was done, by the way, simply by regulation, not even by a vote of the legislature.
01:00Now, I am all for electronic vehicles. I have many constituents who drive them.
01:06However, I think that it should be a matter of choice, that folks should have the chance to,
01:11the opportunity to select what vehicle they want to drive.
01:15Now, the interesting thing about yesterday's testimony by Secretary Buttigieg
01:20is that he actually agreed with me. He testified several times and confirmed,
01:25in response to my questioning, that he does not favor a ban on gas-powered vehicles.
01:31He said that this should be a matter for consumers to choose. So, supposedly,
01:36that would appear to be the same position that I have, that this should be a matter of consumer
01:41choice. But then I asked him whether he is against California's attempt to ban gas-powered vehicles.
01:49And the Secretary responded, well, no, this is a matter of states' rights. The state should be
01:53able to do whatever it wants. Here's the problem. The federal government, the Biden administration,
02:00is actually enabling California to do this. California would not have the ability to ban
02:07gas-powered cars if it were not for the Biden administration giving it special authority to do
02:13so, giving California a waiver under the Clean Air Act. This is something that California asked
02:20the Biden administration for and the Biden administration granted. So, saying that they're
02:26just deferring to what the state is doing, that argument has no merit. In fact, it is precisely
02:33the actions of the Biden administration that is allowing California to take this completely
02:40overreaching action of saying we are going to ban all gas-powered vehicles within about a decade.
02:47So, I was very happy that legislation that I'm supporting, the Preserving Choice in Vehicles Act,
02:56passed the House of Representatives. This would simply rescind the authority that the Biden
03:03administration gave California to ban gas-powered cars. It passed the House of Representatives,
03:09but it has been languishing in the Senate. And I think it is incredibly important
03:14that the Senate take action so that we restore the confidence on the part of consumers in California
03:21and now in many other parts of the country that their right to choose which vehicle to buy
03:27will not be taken away.
03:36Madam Speaker, following yesterday's testimony by Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg,
03:43I am again calling for oversight and, ideally, the end of the high-speed rail project in California.
03:55The Biden administration recently awarded California high-speed rail $3.1 billion,
04:04and Secretary Buttigieg stood behind the project in his testimony yesterday.
04:11However, this project has now been going on for 16 years. Its cost has multiplied many times over.
04:21Estimates are it's now around $128 billion, and the L.A. Times reported that there is a $100
04:28billion funding shortfall, even with the $3.1 billion that the Biden administration provided.
04:36Yet, nevertheless, despite this enormous increase in cost, and despite the fact that essentially
04:42nothing has been built for 16 years, the Biden administration is giving life support for the
04:48project in a way that will cause Californians to have to keep paying taxes to support it going
04:55forward, and a way as well that takes money away, funding a way that could have gone towards
05:00maintaining our roads and providing the transportation services that California so
05:06desperately needs. So, I asked Secretary Buttigieg about a report from the New York Times that the
05:14bullet train actually is not even on track to be finished this century, not on track to be finished
05:21this century, and the Secretary disagreed with the New York Times. He said it will be finished this
05:27century. In fact, he said it will be finished by 2050, by mid-century, although he would not provide
05:35any further estimate, other than to say that it should be completed within the next 26 years.
05:42However, if you look at people who have been directly involved in the project, they say
05:49it's not going to be finished at all. Michael Tenenbaum, who was the first leader of the
05:54High-Speed Rail Authority, said this. He said, I realized the system didn't work.
05:58I don't know how they can build it now. Dan Richard, who was also chairman of the High-Speed
06:03Rail Authority, in fact, the longest-serving chairman, says, I don't think it is an existing
06:08project. It is a loser. Rich Talmach, who is head of the non-profit California Rail Foundation,
06:16says it will never be operable. So why is the Biden administration giving it $3.1 billion,
06:24and why is a project that has a $100 billion funding shortfall allowed to continue?
06:31The reality is that high-speed trains have been built in many parts of the world, and folks who
06:38travel abroad in America, they see it work. Indeed, one of the first operators of the High-Speed Rail
06:45Authority worked on it here in California for several years, and then said we're out. Enough
06:50is enough. They left. They said it's too politically dysfunctional here, so they decided to go to North
06:55Africa, where they said it was less politically dysfunctional, and they indeed did bring a high-
07:00speed rail train online in Morocco in 2018. So this project has failed not because of the limits
07:09of the technology, or even necessarily because of a lack of demand. It has failed because of
07:16political failures, and at this point, our state would be much better served if we stopped throwing
07:22good money after bad. And so I'm fortunate, I'm glad to see that the Transportation Committee,
07:29led by Chairman Graves, has opened up an investigation into the High-Speed Rail Authority,
07:35and I believe it is about time there was finally some accountability
07:40for what might be one of the biggest boondoggles in the history of the United States.

Recommended