UPenn Constitutional Law Professor Outlines Declining Public Opinion Of The Supreme Court

  • 2 months ago
Constitutional Law Professor Kermit Roosevelt joins Forbes Senior Editor Maggie McGrath on "Forbes Newsroom" to discuss the public opinion of the Supreme Court.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00And I want to talk to you about recent polling, and when I say recent, it's not just this year,
00:04this is a trend that's been brewing over the past several years, show that the American public
00:10doesn't have the most favorable view of the Supreme Court. And that's a big change from
00:16when I was a kid and 10, 20, 30 years ago. What was the precipitating factor in your view in the
00:23decline in public opinion of the Supreme Court? And is it ever likely to go back to more neutral
00:30uncontroversial territory? Well, I think there's a pretty clear answer as to why the American public
00:37views the Supreme Court as negatively as it does. And part of it has to do with the ethical
00:42violations, which are just a bad look. I mean, whatever you think about what effect it has on
00:48his decisions, and I think probably the effect is pretty small, if it exists at all. It just
00:53looks very bad for Justice Thomas to be going on these fancy vacations with the multibillionaires
00:58who actually have interest in cases before the court. So that's bad. That's one thing. I think
01:04what's more important is that the Supreme Court looks more and more as though it's representing
01:11a pretty extreme ideology that's held by a pretty small minority of the American people. So the
01:17Supreme Court looks like it's out of step with mainstream American public opinion and also
01:24mainstream American constitutional thinking. And there's a reason for that, which is that you've
01:30got this 6-3 supermajority, even though Republicans lost five of the last eight elections. And if
01:37you've been following the presidential elections, we should have, in fact, a 6-3 Democratic majority.
01:43So what that means is the Supreme Court is pretty far away, six justices away, from where it would
01:50have been if we'd been giving each president two appointments per four-year term. And the last
01:55time it was this far away, so this is almost unprecedented in American history, the last time
02:00it was this far away was when it decided the Dred Scott case in 1858. So I think there's a lesson to
02:08be taken from this, which is when the Supreme Court gets too far away from mainstream American public
02:14opinion, it starts to advance views that the American people don't like. And understandably,
02:20they react against that. I just got goosebumps because that indicates to me that some of the
02:26more unpopular decisions, not just from this term, obviously, we saw the outcry over the
02:30Chevron case, but if you go back two years to Dobbs, Roe v. Wade could still be law if
02:37these reforms had taken place, in your view? Yes, yes, absolutely.

Recommended