• 3 months ago
Earlier this month, Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-MO) questioned Department of Defense Nominees on cyber security and geospatial intelligence during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Thank you. Senator Schmidt. Thank you Senator. Ms. Wilkerson, you may be aware I'm a huge supporter
00:08of NGA and the work that's being done out of NGA in St. Louis, which is my hometown.
00:16And the construction there, there's a lot of opportunities that exist, not just
00:21for our country and our national security, but also that sort of economic ecosystem that exists
00:25around that and I think can be a real catalyst for private sector development as well. But I just,
00:32because of your experience, could you just speak to the importance of geospatial
00:38intelligence in general as it relates to our national defense?
00:43Certainly. And Senator Schmidt, I appreciate your support of NGA and I'm very excited about
00:51the new facility as well. And quite frankly, as I stepped into this job, I also noted really the
00:59commitment of the entire region to really focus in on developing that ecosystem for geospatial
01:05intelligence. To me, when I think about geospatial intelligence, it really illuminates not only the
01:13when and where on the earth, right, but it's also how things are being done. And so that's
01:19where I think GEOINT really pays dividends in being able to illuminate topics that perhaps
01:26other ENTS might not be able to provide. And based on your experience, including
01:34your recent time with NGA, could you discuss a little bit the importance of integrating commercial
01:40imagery products and capabilities into our defense intelligence operations? I know there's
01:47some barriers that exist and maybe you could just sort of address that a little bit.
01:53Senator, yes, we really value, I personally do value the partnership that exists with the
01:58commercial industry in providing products that are easily shareable for the intel consumers as well.
02:08From my perspective, one of the things that we've been focused on is ensuring that we're
02:13from an ODNI and OUSD INS perspective, adhering to the direction in the recommendations that have
02:20been made with respect to commercial imagery acquisition. And so in doing so, it's been
02:25centralized. And so that centralization of that acquisition activity does help to ensure that
02:31there's a cost effective and efficient approach that is in place. I am aware that there are
02:39conversations ongoing regarding, is that the best structure? And so certainly if confirmed,
02:47I would ensure that I would take a look at all equities. I think that's important because
02:53my understanding is that despite the importance of NGA and being a major consumer of the
02:59commercial imagery, the NRO retains the responsibility to contract. Is that your
03:06understanding as well? That is exactly the arrangement. NRO has the responsibility to
03:12procure pixels and NGA has the responsibility to procure commercial analytic services. Well,
03:18you're going to have a great opportunity to look at that alignment, I think, hopefully moving
03:22forward here. I do want to address one other topic quickly on sort of the monoculture concerns that
03:28I've articulated as it relates to our cyber systems. Could you speak to a little of the
03:37potential dangers and vulnerabilities that could open up because of this sort of maybe one vendor
03:42approach or this kind of monoculture that exists in our intelligence community as it relates to
03:46cyber? And just so that I have clarification on your question, Senator, the monoculture that
03:54exists as it relates to commercial? Well, no, so there's a discussion that's going on and I think
04:00there's a little bit of a push and pull here between a bipartisan group of senators who've
04:05raised concerns about some of the hacks that have happened and the fact that we're very reliant on
04:10a single vendor. And I think it's the view of many, including me, that a multi-vendor approach
04:16might provide some additional security here and ameliorate some of the concerns and
04:21vulnerabilities. I'm just curious how you view that. So, thank you for that additional context.
04:27I really think it's incumbent upon us to ensure that we're providing vendors with the right tools
04:34and understanding of the right tools to help to protect the overall infrastructure within
04:40their purview. And so, if confirmed, this is an area that I certainly would
04:47welcome a chance to take a hard look at and understand whether or not we're giving
04:51that right information to vendors to be able to be best protected. Okay. All right. Thank you.

Recommended