• 4 months ago
During a Senate Energy Committee hearing prior to the Congressional recess, Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) spoke about off-shore drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Good morning ma'am. Good morning Senator. I was pleased to hear that you
00:03understand the economic impact of the ability of a family to work offshore in
00:07order to create an opportunity for their daughter to have the future such as you
00:11have had. So because some people are just insensitive to that or don't care. Now
00:18you had mentioned earlier I'm told a question from Senator Manchin that we
00:22will continue leasing but I'm gonna press you on that. We will continue
00:26leasing means sometime in the distant future ten years from now we may not we
00:29may have another lease. But as you know there has to be kind of certainty as to
00:33the flow next year we're gonna have a lease in the year after in the year
00:37after. Because if you work for a company which serves those rigs you can't have a
00:44two-year interruption everybody's laid off and you can no longer do it. So will
00:49there be a lease sale in 2024? Senator I so thank you very much. I what I would
00:58say to you is that I there we've got a five-year plan and if I'm confirmed as
01:04the Deputy Secretary my top priority I've said a piece of this throughout the
01:09hearing it would be to immediately at a deeper level understand the policy
01:16implications and our policy decisions in the energy space. And this is one of them
01:20that's very important and I would want to work with you to understand for
01:26example our five-year plan the approach to offshore leasing that we. Let me stop
01:29for a second. Yes sir. Thank you. In a previous hearing a deputies acting
01:33Deputy Secretary suggested that it would take 18 months to process this. Well that
01:37would put us into late 2025 and 2026. You're thinking you've been in office
01:42for three and a half years. If you'd started right off the bat we would have
01:46like something happening now and then something happening in 25 and 26. So it
01:51seems as if there's foot dragging. I'm just an outside looking in. Oh how long
01:56can we stretch it out so that yeah we're technically doing it but in reality
02:02those families that depend upon this income as your family once did they will
02:06be left hanging out to dry but we don't care because we don't want it to happen.
02:09So I guess my frustration is why is it always tomorrow that this is going to
02:15happen? Why didn't it happen when the dadgum administration took office? So
02:20Senator I know I know this is you know this is a this is a frustrating response
02:25to you but I'm just speaking the truth which is that I haven't been part in the
02:29policy you know conversation on energy since I've been in the administration so
02:34it's so if I were confirmed as Deputy Secretary I would be and and I would
02:40seek to to understand the details and the implications at a deeper level at
02:45that. Let me just mention another observation. It does seem like there's a
02:48strategy of death by a thousand cuts. So there's been this latest ruling
02:54regarding the rice whale in which they found critical habitat maybe because
02:58there was a single possible maybe kind of we think could have been sighting
03:03off of Texas and they know they're off of Florida and so they're putting a
03:07corridor in between. So far not too bad except where they've actually seen the
03:11rice whale the corridor is about five miles wide and off the coast of
03:15Louisiana it's anywhere from 20 to 30 miles wide. That is significant because
03:19there's a 10 mile per hour limitation on speed only for offshore service
03:25vehicles for the rigs not for a powerboat. So it's like a targeted we're
03:31gonna make it economically inefficient for you to actually drill offshore. Now
03:36you have not been there while they're doing this but that is the sort of thing
03:39that from the outside looking in it's just hard to convince me that this is
03:44not a strategy of death of a thousand cuts to the people who depend upon this
03:49industry for their economic livelihood. Again you're gonna say and rightfully so
03:56you've not been part of that decision-making but that will be
03:59something that I will be kind of looking at. It doesn't seem to see as the science
04:04seems quite convenient. We're relying on the science but you can't help but
04:09notice it's five miles wide here but where there's outer continental shelf
04:12drilling is 20 to 30 miles wide. Hmm that science makes a lot of sense to me.
04:17No it doesn't. So now that I've been kind of bursting at the head let me go here.
04:31Revenue sharing let me just ask you about this revenue sharing land water
04:37conservation fund which I know that the chairman has used very nicely for West
04:42Virginia and that Danes was speaking very highly of is funded almost entirely
04:45out of oil and gas revenues. There's a cap that limits the amount coming to the
04:52Gulf States which will use this for coastal restoration. By the time
04:57this conference is over this committee hearings over my state would have lost
05:00about a hundred square yards of land to relative sea level rise. We use that
05:04money to buy our state's Constitution to rebuild our coastline. Last year Louisiana
05:09Texas Mississippi Alabama missed out on about on about 216 million dollars that
05:14would have gone to local resiliency in these four states because there was this
05:18cap that we're trying to raise with the RISE Act. So I'm just asking you with
05:24your experience in the Everglades is there a nice ROI on investment in
05:30resiliency which is to say that if we invest now we have to spend less later? I
05:35promise I didn't plant that question with you Senator Cassidy. Yes there is a
05:40tremendous ROI you know the the numbers we've used in the Everglades for wetland
05:44and coastal restoration is something like four to one ROI and that's that's
05:50an old number it's probably higher now. I traveled to Louisiana last August and
05:57spent some time out there looking at some of that coastal restoration and and
06:03I think you know I know you've got the RISE Act the RISE Act is moving through
06:07and you know if I'm if I'm confirmed as deputy secretary or even in my my
06:12current role my current portfolio you know I would welcome the opportunity to
06:16to work with you under understand you know that you've given me some some some
06:22good numbers I'd like to understand those better about the impact in the
06:25when it comes to revenue sharing cap as well. This coastal restoration is
06:29obviously essential for our coastal states. Thank you. I yield. Thank you. Thank
06:34you Senator.

Recommended