• 4 months ago
During a joint hearing with the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Senate Homeland Security Committee on Tuesday, Sen. Peter Welch (D-VT) questioned officials about the Trump assassination attempt.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Thank you very much. First of all, thank you both for the tremendous work you do,
00:07and for all the folks behind you and under you, so thank you for that.
00:11I kind of want to follow up a little bit on Senator Cotton. There's three issues that have
00:16been raised. One is the selection of who gets protection, and you've addressed that just now.
00:23The other is whether it's a budget issue, which I don't necessarily think it is.
00:29But then there's the operational question.
00:33Was this an operational failure? It appears to me that's where the focus should be.
00:39One of the issues on the operations is the capacity of people who are part of the team,
00:46both Secret Service and also the local law enforcement, their capacity to act on what
00:53they see. This is what Senator Cotton, I think, was talking about with Common Sense.
00:58You mentioned that the sniper was authorized immediately to act. He wasn't checking in with
01:05anyone, and he took out the shooter as quickly as he could. But according to the timeline,
01:13you had local law enforcement capture two photographs of the shooter at 510. At 532,
01:23local law enforcement officers spot a suspicious person who turned out to be the shooter with a
01:28phone and a range finder. At 546, the alert was so significant that snipers text photo of
01:38the shooter from where he was initially spotted to the USS lead sniper. I mean, how is it that
01:46where you had these experienced law enforcement people who understood the gravity of the
01:51responsibility of protecting the presidential candidate, the former president, none of these
01:59actionable observations resulted in action? I'll direct that first to you, Deputy Director Abate.
02:09Thank you, Senator. From the FBI standpoint, we're simply collecting the facts. We've interviewed
02:17most of the officers. Now we'll end up interviewing all of them.
02:20Okay, we'll go to Acting Director Rowe.
02:26So on that, Senator, I think there was a sense of this guy is standing out, and that's why he
02:31came to the attention of local law enforcement. No, I get that. That's my point. He did stand out.
02:37Correct. But nothing happened. I mean, there were alerts, but there was like,
02:44you've got somebody suspicious. Why didn't somebody go interact with the suspicious person,
02:49right away? And they were attempting to locate him. I can't answer that question as to why,
02:55if they took a picture of him and they thought he was unusual, suspicious, not acting normal,
03:02why there wasn't, and I think, again, there was probably an assumption on the part of that
03:08officer that took that picture that, oh, some uniform or somebody will go eventually and walk
03:14up to this. Well, see, that's what seems like an operational failure. Somebody else will do it. So
03:20is the responsibility of an officer to alert some other officer that they think somebody
03:27might be suspicious, or the first officer who sees a suspicious person can take the next step
03:34to actually engage that person, or talk to someone very, very close to it and say,
03:40engage that person? And this guy was wandering around for quite a while.
03:45He was. I can't put myself in the mind of that officer.
03:48I'm not asking you to do that. I'm asking, this is operationally. How does the process work? Okay?
03:56So that is the job of the leaders, as opposed to the officers. Are they empowered to act
04:04immediately upon the observation of someone who looks very suspicious, particularly when they've
04:09got the range finder, they're in a place where it really wasn't about seeing the rally. It was,
04:17as we see, it was a place where you get a good view of former President Trump. I mean, that is
04:23a leadership issue, right? So, Senator, that officer didn't work for me. That was a state
04:28and local officer that made that observation, took that picture. So I can tell you from the
04:34Secret Service perspective, and we do this routinely, is that when people come to our
04:40attention, we locate them, we go up, we do a field interview, or we try to do a consensual encounter.
04:45That's the operational thing I'm talking about. If you do it within Secret Service,
04:49you all are in charge. And you are relying on local law enforcement assets. Those folks,
04:57and they did their job here, up to a point, where they identified this person,
05:03passed information along, but nobody acted. The empowerment to that local officer, I would think,
05:09has to come, be transmitted through the Secret Service, maybe in the earlier briefings. But,
05:15you know, where you say, you know, folks, you see somebody suspicious, you engage that suspicious
05:21person. I don't disagree, Senator. And it goes back to my comments at the beginning of the
05:25hearing that we need to be very direct to our local law enforcement counterparts so that they
05:30understand exactly what their expectations. I yield back. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
05:35Thank you. Senator Tillis, you're recognized for your question.

Recommended