• 4 months ago
During a Senate Appropriations Committee markup on Thursday, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) and Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) raised concern about the post office’s processes.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Senator Merkley. Let me just take a moment to note that in FSGG one of the
00:08issues that I'm very concerned about is that Postmaster General DeJoy has been
00:15downgrading the mail transfer centers and in my home state this means that in
00:21both Eugene and Medford, Central Oregon, that is the middle Willamette Valley and
00:25Southern Oregon, all the mail now has to go to Portland, Oregon to be
00:30redistributed. We are seeing significant delays in mail and I think this is in
00:35many states around the country so I know the Maine vice chair has seen this as
00:42well. This is really devastating, the idea that you send mail to somebody in your
00:48own town and it has to go 300 miles to the north to Portland and 300 miles back.
00:53DeJoy says this results in no delay. You cannot truck something 500 to 600 miles
00:58and not have a delay. This is following the downgrade in Bend in Central Oregon
01:03on the other side of the Cascade Mountains so that that has to go across
01:07the mountains and and go back. This plan delivering for America, it's really
01:15about delivering mail slowly for America and it means a continuous disincentive
01:22to use the mail service which degrades the source of revenues, further
01:28complicating the success of the department. I know folks in my state,
01:33DeJoy said nobody's complaining so I put out a question, how's it going? I
01:37received hundreds of letters saying it's going extremely poorly, people relating
01:41to their received medications, their ability to ship goods from small
01:45businesses, particularly in rural America. I am extremely disturbed about what's
01:51happening in the Postal Service. I suspect many members here are seeing
01:55similar things in the rural parts of their state and I hope we can find a way
02:00to create a lot more pressure to save the postal system from DeJoy. There is
02:05no joy in DeJoyville at this moment. Madam Chair. Vice Chair Collins. I just want to
02:17associate myself with the comments made by Senator Merkley. This is a terrible
02:24plan that the Postmaster General has come up with that would cause huge
02:30delays in the delivery of mail by consolidating the processing centers. In
02:38a state like mine, which is such a large rural state, it would result in mail
02:45having to go ten hours to be sorted and then go back to the community
02:53that's ten miles away and it is a huge problem. We've had a hearing on the
03:00proposal in Maine and one reason I hope that we do get to the FSGG bill is there
03:06is report language on this issue. In Maine, the Postmaster General has put a
03:13temporary pause on the consolidation plan but it simply makes no sense and
03:22ironically the result is going to be that the Postal Service will lose
03:27customers and that's the last thing that we want to see happen. I've also noted
03:36right in my own neighborhood, but I hear reports from across the state, that we're
03:41no longer receiving daily mail delivery and that is a real problem for seniors
03:47who receive medication via the mail and veterans as well. So I do hope that we
03:55can get to the FSGG bill because there is report language on this very
04:01important subject that so matters to our constituents. So thank you for bringing
04:06it up. Senator Sheehan. Madam Chair, if it's in order to continue to talk about
04:12this issue, I would like to add my support for the remarks of both Senators
04:17Merkley and Collins. We are extremely concerned in New Hampshire about what
04:23the Postal Service is doing. They intend to reduce mail processing locally in New
04:28Hampshire by cutting it out entirely from our state, sending it to Massachusetts
04:33and then back to New Hampshire. It's totally unacceptable and the Postmaster
04:39General informed Congress when there was a public outcry about this earlier, that
04:44he was going to suspend all of these changes until January 1st of 2025, but
04:51what we are hearing in New Hampshire from local stakeholders is that the
04:55Postal Service has gone ahead with these proposals. They're already moving
05:00equipment out of New Hampshire. I think this is totally unacceptable and I
05:04agree. We know there's report language in FSGG, but let me just raise my concern
05:11about CBO's analysis of report language because we put in language that would
05:21prevent the Postal Service from moving forward with those changes, just as the
05:27Postmaster said months ago, and the CBO has said that that scored as costing
05:33money even though it was report language. I don't understand how CBO figures that,
05:39but I think that they need to think carefully about how directing the Postal
05:46Service to comply with what it told Congress it was doing two months ago
05:50could actually cost money. So I don't know what this committee can do about it,
05:56but boy I think we ought to raise our concerns with not just the Postal
06:00Service but CBO about what's going on here.

Recommended