• 4 months ago
Prior to the Congressional recess, during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) questioned Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell about efforts to fill vacant ambassador roles.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Senator Van Hollen.
00:01Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Secretary, thank you for your service.
00:05Thank you for your strong backing for the men and women of the Foreign Service and for
00:10the entire State Department team.
00:14Appreciate all that you're doing on their behalf.
00:17And I do want to just second the remarks made by some of my colleagues, which you've underscored,
00:22which is we need all our players on the playing field.
00:25It makes no sense and undermines our interests every day that we do not have ambassadors
00:30on post at places around the world, over 20 of them where China has an ambassador.
00:37We don't.
00:38But just in general, to represent the values and interests of the United States.
00:43So it is it's a dereliction of duty, in my view, that we're not moving these men and
00:48women through the process.
00:50You mentioned our ambassador in Gabon, and I think she's representative of the great
00:54ambassadors that we have around the world.
00:57Just to underscore a couple of points that you've made and my my colleagues have made.
01:02First of all, in terms of engaging our NATO and European partners and East Asian partners
01:07in support of both our efforts to defend Ukraine against Putin, but also to counter China's
01:16efforts to support Russia and Putin in the war machine, not with direct arms transfers,
01:21but supporting the military industrial base.
01:23Thank you for your efforts to have a collective initiative with our European partners.
01:30I know we need to do more, and I know you're working on that in terms of sanctions on Chinese
01:34firms there.
01:36Finally, across the global south, you can't beat something with nothing.
01:41As you say, you know, we don't ask everybody to choose between the United States and China.
01:48We ask them to look at what we both have to offer.
01:51We have a lot to offer in terms of our open system, transparency, accountability, investment,
01:56but we are not fully engaging in terms of the economic front.
02:01DFC is a critical tool.
02:03Look, I support our military efforts in Africa, China, but my view is that we're probably
02:10overweighted there and underweighted when it comes to these other areas of competition.
02:16Now some parts of the world don't need our direct public investment.
02:20They don't need a subsidy.
02:22They don't need the DFC.
02:24And that includes Saudi Arabia, some of the Gulf countries like the UAE.
02:27And I just was two weeks ago on a trip that included stops in Saudi Arabia and the UAE.
02:35In Saudi Arabia, I met with the Crown Prince.
02:36I also met with the Minister of Communications, Abdullah al-Swawa.
02:42He mentioned that he'd had a very productive meeting with you.
02:46And then in the UAE, you know, lots of interest in moving forward in this partnership with
02:53between G42 and Microsoft.
02:55So I want to go back a little bit to the question that Senator Murphy raised, Senator Booker
03:01really alluded to.
03:03On the one hand, we definitely want to be the players of choice when it comes to investment
03:11in high tech, right?
03:13It was very clear, both the Saudis and the folks in the UAE, they want to engage first
03:18and foremost with U.S. companies because of U.S. technological expertise.
03:25On the other hand, we do want to make sure that our partners are not, you know, transferring
03:31important technological secrets to China and others.
03:37Can you, you know, look through that lens a little bit, Saudi Arabia and UAE, and tell
03:42me how we would balance those competing interests?
03:47First of all, thank you, Senator.
03:51I agree with the value proposition.
03:55And I think in many respects, it really comes down, if I can be so direct, to the nature
04:00of the negotiation.
04:02And we need to understand that what we are putting on the table in each of these relationships
04:08is extraordinarily valuable.
04:11It is our technological prowess, which is unmatched in most of these areas in AI and
04:17the like.
04:18We are the leader, and we will continue to be.
04:22And there is a huge advantage to work more closely with an American firm.
04:27Secondly, our security engagement is stabilizing and important to a number of these countries.
04:36And so recognizing that in any set of engagements that are around the future of our relationship,
04:44we probably have the ability to be quite direct about what our expectations are, and then
04:51follow through on that.
04:52And so I'm very much of the view to explore and deepen these partnerships.
04:58But yes, there has been a tendency in the past to basically seek to have it both ways
05:04in certain circumstances.
05:05When it comes to these fundamental issues that are so important to American strategic
05:11purpose, we have to be unambiguous about this.
05:15They're going to have to make some choices.
05:17I appreciate it.
05:18Thank you, Mr. Secretary.

Recommended