'China's Most Effective National Security Tools': Chris Murphy Urges Efforts To Combat 'Propaganda'

4 months ago

Prior to the Congressional recess, during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) questioned Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell about disinformation, and China's moves in the Middle East.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript

Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Transcript

00:00Senator Murphy. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. Good to see you, Mr. Secretary.

00:05I'm gonna ask you two questions, one on disinformation and one on China and the

00:09Middle East. So one of China's most effective national security tools is

00:13propaganda and misinformation. Their investment dwarfs the investment the

00:19United States makes. Estimates are China's spending somewhere in the

00:21neighborhood of seven billion dollars per year. The United States clearly does

00:27some of this work through the Department of Defense, but inside the

00:30Department of State exists the Global Engagement Center, which is funded at a

00:33relatively paltry 61 million dollars, but over the course of the last half decade

00:38has done some pretty extraordinary work to track Chinese misinformation and to

00:44help local actors be able to fight back. The Global Engagement Center is set to

00:49expire. The authorization for the center is set to expire at the end of this year.

00:53What would be the impact if we lost the capacity to help coordinate with allies,

00:58help to fund efforts in and around the Chinese theater to combat Chinese

01:04misinformation, if we lost the authorization for the Global Engagement

01:07Center? Senator, first of all, thank you for the question. Let me just say I think

01:11some of the work that the GEC has done in the last couple of years is deeply

01:16innovative and helpful to American purpose, and I commend the work under

01:23Jamie Rubin, the leader of the organization, and others who work underneath him. I will

01:28simply say this, what it has done that has been made a difference in a number

01:34of places is simply illuminating the strategies, the actors, and the strategy

01:41that both China and Russia have undertaken. And so, these

01:45countries' ability, China, Russia, to manipulate and maneuver is done

01:51largely out of public view. When you expose it, it actually can be quite

01:57purposeful and effective. I would simply say that you are absolutely right. It's a

02:03small amount of money. We have a little bit at DOD that we're working, but the

02:07challenge is enormous. I'll just give you one example, Senator. When I was

02:11asked to go to the Solomons to basically contest what the Chinese were doing

02:16there, I remember waking up in the morning, getting the local newspaper on

02:21the cover, this is right after the war had started in Ukraine, was a long story

02:26about the chemical and biological weapons facilities that the United

02:31States maintained in Ukraine, right? Clearly effective Russian and Chinese

02:36disinformation, and we just have to do a better job contesting this globally. A

02:41first step would just be the GEC reauthorized. It is, I think the GEC has

02:47done more on Russia than China, but I think it's stepping up its game

02:52substantially on China as well. Yeah, just in the last year and a half, 22

02:56different reports produced by the GEC specifically naming Chinese propaganda

03:01efforts, which is you state is sort of the first and sometimes most effective

03:05tool. Let me turn to the Gulf. Obviously we have had a number of conversations

03:13this committee about the administration's conversation around

03:16extending a security guarantee to Saudi Arabia that would, you know, impact our

03:20broader security applications in the region towards all of our Gulf allies. I

03:26want to ask you about the future of Gulf cooperation with China. I think the

03:32history suggests that the our Gulf allies are sort of seeking to have it

03:37both ways, right? We'll play the United States off against China fairly

03:40regularly, and there's very recent evidence of that. Saudi Arabia's massive

03:45investment in the leading Chinese AI company, certainly contrary to US

03:50national security interests, the ongoing maturation of UAE's defense relationship

03:57with China. I guess I have two sort of simple questions for you on this

04:02portfolio. One, do you agree that a security treaty with a country like

04:09Saudi Arabia only makes sense if our China policies are aligned? And two, is

04:16there any reason to be optimistic that the Gulf nations are going to do

04:21anything other than continue to play the United States and China off against each

04:25other to get the best deals that they can get on economic investment, security

04:31relationships, etc.? So it's an important question, and I do think when we're

04:36talking about some of these fundamental decisions on the part of the United

04:40States, security guarantees substantial investments in technology. You know, we

04:46often say, look, we don't ask countries to choose, but we want them to have choice

04:51in certain circumstances where we're putting our stuff on the line, whether

04:56technology or our commitment to support you, I'm afraid it is a

05:02binary choice. And I think we would have to insist on that as we go forward. I

05:07will say the Middle East is complicated. Senator, you talked about the whole

05:11region. There was a period not long ago where Israel also, very deep engagements

05:17with China and the United States, has chosen largely now to engage directly

05:22with the United States because they understand the nature of what they were

05:26doing had implications for their own security, given China's other actions. I

05:32wouldn't want to go through a taxonomy of each country in the Gulf, but my guess

05:38is that we'll have more luck with some than others, but ultimately the process

05:43of this all rests on other issues being resolved, and it is just enormously

05:49challenging. So I do think we are right to try to contest. It's an important

05:55region, but at the same time, we also have to be clear that we have some real

05:59advantages. Our technology, our security guarantee must not be given lightly, and

06:06we must demand many things in response. Senator Cain.

'China's Most Effective National Security Tools': Chris Murphy Urges Efforts To Combat 'Propaganda'

Category

Transcript

Recommended