• 4 months ago
Prior to the Congressional recess, during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, Sen. James Risch (R-ID) questioned Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell about China's role in Ukraine peace negotiations and efforts, as well as resistance to sanctions.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thanks so much for being here, and I always appreciate your
00:05understanding of these issues and frankness. At your confirmation hearing, we talked about the
00:11situation of inviting China into the peace process for Ukraine, and you expressed your
00:20agreement with me that this wasn't a good idea, which is an understatement. In the meantime,
00:25the State Department officials have told this committee that China must be at the table.
00:29I'm assuming, like a lot of things, there isn't complete agreement, but help me understand this.
00:35Where are we on this, and how hard are we going to have to push to get this done right? It seems
00:40that our European partners get this, and for whatever reason,
00:44the place where you work doesn't seem to get this, so help me out.
00:50Thank you, Senator. To be honest, I'm not aware of those consultations that you have had. I will
00:56tell you that I would generally say any kind of discussion like that is premature. The dominant
01:04arena of engagement is on the battlefield. I see no sign of Russians in any way easing up
01:12on their brutal offensives with Ukraine. If you signal too early your interest in
01:18getting to the negotiating table, I think it sends the wrong message,
01:23and it's a signal of weakness more generally. Ultimately, I had extensive discussions with
01:29your team about this. Senator, I must say I found those arguments quite persuasive.
01:37I am personally troubled by China's actions publicly stating that we're in favor of peace,
01:45we're not taking sides, but then privately providing the support for their industrial
01:52base in ways that will change the balance of military power, not just in Ukraine, Senator,
01:57but in Europe for decades to come. So I find those quite troubling. I think they have to be
02:03accounted for more directly. I believe the United States, with its key partners in Europe, have to
02:09play the dominant role if we find ourselves in a situation, which we hope for, that we can arrive
02:16at a just peace with Ukraine and Russia. We are nowhere near that right now, Senator, and so
02:23talk about what the nature of the table looks like and who's sitting around it. That's premature.
02:31Great thoughts. It seems to me that the Europeans and the rest of the world made a huge mistake
02:39with Russia over recent decades, thinking they were something that they weren't. And now the
02:44price is being paid for that. And I think the problem is there's some people making the same
02:50mistake right now with China, thinking that there's something that they're not. And your
02:55observation that that mistake could carry consequences that goes into generations,
03:00I agree with 100%. I think Europeans, because of their experience with Russia, are very,
03:07very reluctant to make the same mistake with China. And I think China hasn't helped either.
03:12You know, Europe's experience with the Lithuanians with China has really, really
03:18woken up the Europeans as to what they're dealing with as far as China is concerned.
03:23Look, Congress recently passed legislation on a bipartisan basis to sanction China for the
03:29oil purchases. And I'm not seeing, there was a lot of enthusiasm up here in the Hill for that.
03:35I'm not seeing the same enthusiasm for the administration, which isn't surprising because
03:40whenever we talk about sanctions, Treasury always pushes back to a degree, state always pushes back.
03:46We up here seem to be a little more ready to draw that weapon and use it. Your thoughts?
03:54Look, Senator, we've engaged on this quite a bit. I really understand and take your points to heart.
04:00I would point out, and I think you know it, you've heard it so many times of the
04:04hundreds of other sanctions that we have undertaken more directly.
04:10I do think, and I will just state clearly, that Iran is an implacable foe of the United States.
04:16We have to contest them everywhere, not just in the Middle East, not just with respect to the
04:24Houthis, but increasingly the role that they are also playing on the battlefields of Europe
04:30and Ukraine. So I take that very seriously. I understand the points. Sanctions policy,
04:37as you underscore, Senator, and you understand, are complex. There are often concerns about
04:43certain steps that you might take in a financial arena could have secondary, tertiary effects.
04:50I don't mean that as an excuse, but these are complex matters. I do think we have taken
04:56consequential steps, but I need to take back to the building a specific set of recommendations
05:02that you carry. I do also want to just point to something that you raised at the outset.
05:08You know, Europe has had two major challenges. One is the Russia energy and national security
05:16challenge. Many of these countries had hoped for a deeper economic and commercial relationship
05:21with China. I will tell you after substantial discussions, both in my previous job,
05:27Senator, and this job, Europeans understand the risks. They are coming around. We're working
05:33much more consequentially with them, not just on Russia, but China as well.

Recommended