• 2 months ago
#bilawalbhutto #asifzardari #constitutionalcourt #bilawalbhutto #constitutionalamendment #supremecourt #judicialreforms #khawarghumman #haidernaqvi #breakingnews

"Bilawal Bhutto Kisi Waqt Bhi Prime Minister Ban Sakte Thay Magar un Kay Walid..." Chaudhry Ghulam Hussain's Analysis
Transcript
00:00The question that is being debated is not whether the Ayni court is needed or not.
00:07The question is that the powers that the Ayni court will have, how much will it compete with the Supreme Court of Pakistan.
00:18There are very famous lawyers on this.
00:21Respected Muneer-e-Malik, you may remember him in the Lawyers' Movement.
00:26He played a key role in this.
00:28I think he was a lawyer for Ghazi Faisal.
00:33What is he saying?
00:34If this happens, what kind of problems will arise?
00:39Do you know what the situation is in Korea?
00:41There are two courts like this in Korea.
00:43One is the Constitutional Court and the other is the Supreme Court.
00:46One court gives a verdict against the other.
00:49The other court gives a verdict against the other.
00:51What happens is a paralysis.
00:53Do you want this?
00:55Don't we want judicial stability?
01:00Salman Akram Rai, General Secretary of Pakistan Tariq-e-Insaf,
01:04what is he saying?
01:06The issue is the intention.
01:08The intention behind making the Ayni court,
01:12we see some flaw in it.
01:15It should not be made and it should not be made at this time.
01:18Whatever arguments are there in favour or against the Ayni court,
01:22the Ayni court that is in place at this time,
01:24is purely on the basis of ideology.
01:26The intention is that the Prime Minister should appoint a new Chief Justice of the court,
01:32who has come before us.
01:34And that Chief Justice should appoint as many judges as he wishes.
01:39So this is exactly a kitchen, you can call it a court,
01:44that is being made at this time,
01:46through which the Supreme Court should be brought down.
01:49And all the Ayni-type cases should be sent to that court,
01:53which party should be banned,
01:55who should be punished by the military court,
01:58all this should be achieved through the four or six judges chosen by hand.
02:03This is the most historic moment in the history of Pakistan,
02:07which we are going through.
02:10Viewers, the other day, Fawad Chaudhary came to the program of Kashif Abbasi.
02:14Obviously, he has experience, he is a lawyer as well.
02:18In his opinion, if something like this happens,
02:21then the existing judges of the Supreme Court,
02:23may not be in this position.
02:25Should they resign?
02:27These eight judges, and if you include three or four more judges,
02:31they do not have a job problem.
02:33These are judges of international standard.
02:35These people will never sit in such a court,
02:38which will have such conditions.
02:40They will not sit in the Session Court?
02:42No, they will not sit in the Supreme Court.
02:44Even in the High Court, you will not find an honorable person in this system.
02:48So you are saying that the judges can resign?
02:50They will 100% resign.
02:52It is not possible to judge in this system.
02:54Okay, Mr. Chaudhary Gulamshan, the government is adamant.
02:58Earlier, you know, Pakistan Muslim League Noon tried.
03:01Now, Mr. Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, it appears,
03:05that he has taken up this responsibility.
03:08Now, some people also think that,
03:10you have seen that there is a lot of discussion on social media,
03:14that Mr. Shahbaz Sharif's days have been counted.
03:17And Mr. Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, he has come forward with his CV,
03:21that the Prime Minister tried to make an amendment,
03:26but he failed.
03:27So we will take up this responsibility,
03:29we will complete it,
03:30and then the Prime Minister's post,
03:33will also go to the Pakistan People's Party.
03:35Mr. Chaudhary.
03:38No, obviously, whatever majority he shows there,
03:41he has the right to make it a government.
03:43But the independent observers, the political ones,
03:46they do not agree with these things.
03:48Mr. Bilawal Bhutto Zardari could have become the Prime Minister at any time.
03:52And if he wanted to become,
03:54his father would not have agreed at that time.
03:57Otherwise, it would have been better,
04:00if the People's Party would have made it a government,
04:02and the PTI would not have opposed it.
04:05Sooner or later, the country is going to move forward,
04:08and the country will move according to the law and the constitution.
04:11Through their desires and mischief,
04:16the country that is already going down,
04:19will not be allowed to go down further.
04:24This is my firm belief,
04:26and very soon you will hear,
04:28that whatever they are doing,
04:30will fall on their necks.
04:34Okay, Mr. Naqvi,
04:35the Supreme Court's Senior Penal Judge,
04:38who is going to be the Chief Justice in the future,
04:40Justice Mansoor Ali Shah,
04:41who is in the Federal Judicial Academy,
04:42he gave an address.
04:43Yesterday, he gave an address there.
04:46During the address, he said,
04:48the information he shared,
04:50that I don't think,
04:51the next trial can be a trial of 24 lakh cases.
04:56This is what Mr. Mansoor Ali Shah said.
04:58The number of cases is increasing every day.
05:00The number of judges is only 4,000,
05:03Justice Mansoor Ali Shah.
05:05Now, the question, Mr. Naqvi,
05:07is this,
05:08that we need reforms in the courts,
05:11we need them in the lower courts,
05:13we need them at the district level,
05:15we need them at the district level,
05:17at the provincial level.
05:19This is what was said in the Charter of Democracy.
05:22A while ago, you gave your observation,
05:25that if a legal issue arises,
05:28it seems that it can be solved.
05:31My and your opinion may differ on that,
05:34but which legal issue is pending?
05:37The Supreme Court's decision has come,
05:39in this regard,
05:40the decision of the special sessions has come,
05:42for 2-4 days,
05:43for 7-10 days,
05:44for all the days,
05:45the case has been heard,
05:46the decision has come.
05:47Now, by creating a new court,
05:50what objectives will be achieved,
05:52if you do not reform the courts,
05:55if you do not reform the courts,
05:57at the level of lower courts?
05:58Mr. Naqvi.
05:59Yes,
06:00I will talk about the decision later,
06:03I will say a small thing.
06:04If tomorrow,
06:05there is a resolution in the National Assembly,
06:07that Mansoor Ali Shah is the senior most judge,
06:11and he will become the Chief Justice,
06:13and he will be notified immediately.
06:15And this resolution comes from Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf,
06:17and the Fidesz party also votes for him.
06:19So, should this happen?
06:20What do you think, should this happen?
06:22Whether this happens or not,
06:23Mr. Naqvi,
06:24it does not make any difference,
06:25because the law is very clear,
06:27it is the law of the land.
06:28It should happen, right?
06:31No,
06:32whether he does it or not,
06:33whether he notifies or not,
06:35the resolution,
06:36he is not in need of that notification,
06:39it will be notified on the 26th.
06:40Yes, Mr. Naqvi.
06:41If the National Assembly passes this notification,
06:43it does not make any difference.
06:46So, which National Assembly is this?
06:47If the members of the National Assembly are not authentic,
06:50then why do you all accept the decisions
06:52that are in your hands,
06:53and those decisions,
06:54I am talking to you about the opposition.
06:56Why don't you all accept the decisions
06:57that are not in your hands?
06:59So, this is a big question.
07:00Then let's talk about the decision.
07:01Now, let's come to the Supreme Court.
07:03Let's get out of the National Assembly.
07:04Let's go to the Supreme Court.
07:06A decision was made by the Supreme Court
07:08in reference to Mansoor Nashis,
07:10which the National Assembly,
07:12as of now,
07:13and the Election Commission,
07:14has still refused to accept.
07:17If they did,
07:18then it means that
07:19they are going against the Supreme Court's decision,
07:23which you can also call the contempt of court.
07:26You can't say that.
07:27This is what the law of the land says.
07:29Listen, what I am saying,
07:30let me complete my argument.
07:32Okay?
07:33Now, this Supreme Court has given one more decision.
07:35The one with the flag.
07:37The judges of the Supreme Court
07:39do not accept their own decision.
07:41Whether they are sitting in that bench or not.
07:43So, what kind of logic is this?
07:45The decision on the flag was not reviewed.
07:48No decision has been made on it yet.
07:50The decision on the flag is still pending.
07:52So, what should the Election Commission do?
07:54What should the National Assembly do?
07:55Someone with logic,
07:57tell me this.

Recommended