La perito involucrada en el caso de la desaparición de Loan, ha enviado una carta a los medios desmintiendo las acusaciones que pesan sobre ella. En su misiva, niega haber usurpado títulos militares y afirma que nunca fue notificada por la policía. Sin embargo, surgen más cuestionamientos sobre su figura y su vinculación con el caso.
👉 Seguí en #Alerta24/7
👉 Seguí en #Alerta24/7
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Things happened in such a short period of time.
00:03Yes.
00:04Could it be that information arrived?
00:06We are dealing with the subject of the alleged Perito Lescano.
00:12She says, or we read the letter, the part where it says...
00:16We finished reading the exclusive document,
00:18a letter addressed to the media, of the alleged Perito María Luisa Lescano,
00:23that high-ranking rescuer that no one knows yet,
00:27they could not explain well, she could not do it,
00:30why it arrived and how.
00:32Well, but she says that the police personnel never went to notify her.
00:36Or at least that's what La Misiva prays for, right?
00:39Show me the letter in the part where it says
00:43that no rescuer went to notify her of anything.
00:46Do we have that part, Bani?
00:49Well, now...
00:51Denies everything. Denies having usurped military personnel titles,
00:56which is a file in Neuquén.
01:00Denies having usurped land.
01:02Well, here's the letter, she says it.
01:04Read it, read it.
01:06I also want to clarify that the accusations of alleged imputation
01:10and disappearance are completely unfounded.
01:13I reside in the same place as always,
01:15leading a normal life with my daughters.
01:18These rumors are nothing more than a continuation
01:21of the persecution and the media attack
01:23without the foundations that I have been suffering.
01:27I reaffirm my commitment to the truth
01:29and to the defense of the rights of the families.
01:32Well, up to there she says that she is in the same place
01:35whenever they went to notify her.
01:37But...
01:38Well, now, let's see, give it to me.
01:41Look, of course, there are people...
01:45To what she sells, the images.
01:47What's more, in private messages she says,
01:49look, there are cameras, they will see that they did not notify me.
01:52Well, 12-20, from yesterday, 12-20,
01:55obviously I have to take out the top part
01:58that shows the person who sends it here to the program,
02:03and it says that at 12-20 that patrolman went to notify her
02:09and that it is not true that the police are not going.
02:13In fact, they tell me, he goes every day.
02:15I don't know, I really don't know,
02:18I don't know if that is the home of the expert.
02:22That is, if it is not, she has the power to call us
02:27and tell us, no, grandma, you are wrong,
02:30that is not my home, and we will clarify things
02:33and tell her, well, make the home available
02:36so that they can notify her.
02:37Look...
02:38In principle, what people tell you is that they are going to notify her
02:40and it is this way.
02:43One always gives the benefit of the doubt, right?
02:46To all those who come out and face it.
02:48Let's remember that she has appeared on this program twice, right?
02:51She came out, answered all the questions,
02:54what happens is that, of course, more information begins to arrive,
02:57about Neuquen, that they find her with a military uniform
03:00without being part of the army,
03:03they open a file for her,
03:05well, a lot of questions,
03:08the link with General Rodríguez,
03:10she is denying it, right?
03:11But at some point it is like it is short, right?
03:14And she can't deny everything.
03:18Let's not lose sight of the fact that she is a secondary character
03:22in the disappearance of Lohan,
03:24she is a secondary character,
03:25she has to pay if there is any judicial reproach,
03:29yes, of course, of course, yes, of course,
03:32but that the tree does not cover the forest,
03:34it is not that Lescano is the monster that disappeared to the forest,
03:39no, no, no,
03:40there are a lot of people who are taking care of themselves
03:42and it is convenient to talk about Lescano instead of others.
03:44It is a gear that, let's see,
03:46if we have to make a graph,
03:49part of General Rodríguez, right?
03:51The chief of the complex crime division of the police,
03:56to whom the two police officers who have just declared responded,
03:59they had to give explanations on the phone,
04:01the one who declared yesterday,
04:02the expert with whom she obviously had a link.
04:05It's not the same, Diego.
04:06It's not the same.
04:07It's not the same.
04:08I put the expert in a third or fourth line,
04:11yes?
04:12I can't put the police in a third or fourth line.
04:15They are public officials.
04:16They are public officials.
04:17I can't put the provincial prosecutors in a fourth line,
04:20even if they don't call them.
04:21I can't put Pérez, Caixaba, Pellegrini and Codazzi
04:27in a third or fourth line either.
04:32I can't put Pérez and Caixaba either,
04:34I can't put Laudelina either.
04:36I mean, I think we have to start putting orders, right?
04:40Yes.
04:41Do we have to go against everyone?
04:42Yes, of course, against everyone.
04:45But that Lescano doesn't cover the rest.
04:47Obviously.
04:48No, no, from now on, we'll take care of it.
04:50No, because I hear a lot of things.
04:51Day after day.
04:52No, no, I hear a lot of people talking
04:54and pointing to the third and fourth line,
04:56but they don't touch the top.
04:57I understand.
04:58So I'm not going to...
04:59That's why we're here.
05:00Well, I don't buy rotten fish from anyone.
05:02Well, there's this writing.
05:04Carlitos, could you see it?
05:06Yes.
05:07A seven-page writing that says,
05:08Mr. Prosecutor, two points.
05:10It's not tied up, it's already strange in itself.
05:13The writing, but it's what makes us get
05:15through an intermediary,
05:17the Lescano expert,
05:18who supposedly wrote this to the prosecutor.
05:22Do you want me to make time for you?
05:25Bring the fire extinguisher back.
05:27Ah, I'll bring it.
05:28Smoke.
05:29One more ghost.
05:30Because...
05:31Okay.
05:32Among other things,
05:33what the expert does in this case is...
05:38First of all,
05:39not to provide any information
05:40about how the cause arrives.
05:42Personally,
05:43I am summoned,
05:44who?
05:45Nobody.
05:46Having already elapsed a few days,
05:49there is no precise data.
05:51You don't say who summons you?
05:52No.
05:53And then,
05:54he begins to make
05:57a justification
05:59of the note he gives
06:00to a journalist in the place.
06:02And that's where the writing really starts.
06:05Everything else is nothing.
06:07Chachara.
06:08Chachara.
06:09But wait.
06:10And what follows is also chachara.
06:12Because do you know what the writing is about?
06:13Chachara.
06:14I read it all.
06:15It starts by saying,
06:16being in the current,
06:17I received a WhatsApp from such a journalist
06:19to make a note.
06:21And there it says,
06:22I was in the current,
06:23I was cited for the disappearance of Loan.
06:26It doesn't say who.
06:27Here he said Maciel.
06:28Yes.
06:29That Maciel calls her.
06:30Yes.
06:31By video call,
06:32which caught our attention, right?
06:33It explains the objective derivatives of the investigation.
06:36Yes.
06:37Written by a lawyer, right?
06:38She says she was a lawyer
06:39and she received a notification
06:40that we still do not find in Italy.
06:41Wait, wait.
06:42If she wrote a lawyer,
06:43now I'm going to send it to Bani
06:44to show it in the next block.
06:45And he begins to report
06:47how the justice takes a statement
06:50from the journalist
06:52to whom she gives the note
06:54and makes an endless number of paragraphs
06:58invoking freedom of expression.
07:01Journalists are not obliged to reveal their sources.
07:04Now he's going to say he's a journalist?
07:06No, no, no.
07:07Because they quote her to declare the journalist
07:09to whom she gives the note.
07:10She defends the journalist.
07:11Exactly.
07:12She's doing that.
07:13And wait.
07:14Weird.
07:15Because you tell me
07:16that this was written by a lawyer.
07:19She introduces herself personally, right?
07:23It's a potestá that gives the professional code.
07:25It's for her own right.
07:26Of course.
07:27For her own right,
07:28without a lettered representation,
07:30without a lawyer.
07:31Look.
07:32I read you today,
07:33and now we are going to share it
07:34after the break.
07:35Look how she writes.
07:36I don't know who advised her,
07:37Dr. Lescano,
07:38the expert Lescano.
07:39We must not lose sight
07:40of the main complaint.
07:42An unfounded one,
07:43there is no comma,
07:44and poor complaint
07:45of title usurpation.
07:47It is not a super case of drug trafficking.
07:49It is not a super case of drug trafficking.
07:52It's written like this.
07:53It's a delirium.
07:54Nor a case of fetishism.
07:56Of whom?
07:57Nor a case of fetishism.
08:00I don't know.
08:01Let's see.
08:02Let's talk to someone who knows.
08:04It's a mistake.
08:06She wanted to put femicide.
08:08Typography.
08:10Anything.
08:11I'm analyzing it.
08:12Yes.
08:13I leave it thinking.