Nico Mattioli fue imputado por realizar una maniobra negligente que resultó en la muerte de Claudia, una ciclista que se dirigía a su trabajo. A pesar de no haber estado bajo los efectos del alcohol o drogas al momento del accidente y conducir a 53 km/h, Mattioli no vio a la víctima debido posiblemente al polarizado del auto. El abogado de la familia de la víctima, Bruno Rugna, confirma que las pericias coinciden con esta versión.
#DDM
#DDM
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00To understand what happened Mariana, there is this security camera that we just reviewed in the report.
00:06A quite eloquent camera where you can see the truck that Matioli was driving,
00:11which ends up impacting Claudia, who finally ends up dying.
00:15The indictment made by Prosecutor Rosana Marcolin says, and emphasizes this,
00:22that she was not drunk and that she had not consumed drugs.
00:27And they also specify, now let's see if the lawyer agrees with this,
00:31that she was driving at 53 km per hour.
00:34It was not a great speed, but he did not see her.
00:39According to the prosecution's indictment, she makes a negligent maneuver.
00:45A negligent maneuver that does not allow her to see the cyclist and that is why she runs over him.
00:51This that is here, Mariana.
00:52Is that or is it the poor vision that he has in his eyes?
00:55It may also be the poor vision of the eye.
00:57The polarized of the car and that mirror that is not conditioned for him, right?
01:02Because I don't know, in the images, the maneuver that is said to have been done is something that he did inside the car.
01:08I understand that when ...
01:09Because he comes straight there.
01:10Yes, but you notice that before impacting Claudia, you can already see that he raises the ground from the side.
01:17Perhaps the maneuver to which you mean to have driven very over the bench.
01:23Of course, I understand.
01:24And then, once he impacts, he returns to the center of the lane.
01:28I understand, I understand.
01:28Perhaps that may have been the negligent maneuver.
01:31This that is here, Mariana, is a work of the DDM production, where we will be able to see some images of the file.
01:39This is the cover of the accidental investigation, as we go through it, we will see how the justice marks some points of the security camera.
01:49Look at the arrow where the truck marks, let's go through it, so we are showing what happened.
01:55This is the moment of the precise impact, they mark it with a black arrow because there the justice freezes at the precise moment of the impact.
02:05Here we see in this image how the bicycle is lying down.
02:08Look down there to the right, we see how the bicycle has been and now you will see an image of the closest bicycle, still, and of the truck.
02:17Notice how the back of the bicycle, the cover, the back tire is completely broken by the impact and you can see the mark of the truck.
02:27The lady, the victim, died in the act, right?
02:29Yes, I understand that they took her to transfer, but finally she died from a very serious injury to the head, by a very serious blow to the head.
02:37You have to see if, here you have another photo, this is from the file, this is exclusive, the bicycle behind completely broken by the impact.
02:45Of course, it touched her, what happens is that a bicycle, of course, no matter how slow the car comes.
02:50It flew away and ended up dying.
02:52Now that car hit at 53 kilometers per hour.
02:54Well, it also caught my attention, that's why I was going to tell you now to see if the family's lawyers agree with this.
03:02What we have understood is that the truck was going at 53 kilometers per hour, or at least that in the previous moments it was going at 53 kilometers per hour on average.
03:14We have to see if they agree with this situation, because it seems that it is a slightly stronger blow, right?
03:19We are going to ask the lawyer of Nico Mattioli's family, sorry, of Nico Mattioli's victim's family.
03:27This is Dr. Bruno Rugna, how are you Bruno? Thank you very much for attending us.
03:31Thank you, good afternoon Mariana and the whole team.
03:33First I wanted to ask you about the victim's family, we talked to them at some point.
03:39I remember that they even told us, we talked to the brother, it seems to me, of the victim who told us that they knew Nico Mattioli because they had been part of his professional team at some point.
03:49How did the victim's family take this resolution and the imputation of Nico Mattioli?
03:56Well, first of all, we are the representative lawyers of the children.
04:01She unfortunately had three children, one older and two younger, and well, of whom she lived with Cubino.
04:08They are the ones who have active legitimacy, we know that you were talking to the rest of the family.
04:13It is not a pleasant situation, it is not the first time that this same family has been hit by a situation of these characteristics.
04:19Yes, I know, yes.
04:20Yes, the brother of Claudia told us, do you remember?
04:24Yes, with another relative, exactly.
04:27So you are representing Claudia's children, then, okay.
04:30Exactly, yes, yes, yes.
04:33Are there problems in the family?
04:37No, no, there are no problems, but it is worth clarifying the victim's law and who she admits as a creditor,
04:45that we would be the active legitimators, the person we represent.
04:49Beyond the fact that the family background is secondary, it is broader, right?
04:52Very good, yes, Mariano.
04:54Doctor, what would be the impediment for Leo Mattioli's son to act?
04:59Because I understand that there was a statement where there was emphasis on this,
05:03that there are carpenters, drivers, musicians, a whole company around him.
05:07If he has to wait in freedom for the prosecution of the file or the future trial,
05:12what is the drawback of him continuing to work?
05:17We don't see any drawback in him continuing to work.
05:20Coincidentally, he has a job in the field of entertainment, like any other job.
05:26The fact that he can transit or not in freedom, the process has to do with the process risk,
05:31that is, a risk of escape or hindrance in the investigation,
05:35which the prosecutor believed was not the case.
05:38In fact, he...
05:40Yes, that's why they didn't give him a home, let's say.
05:43That's why I don't even think there was a judge present, because it wasn't a home.
05:46He gave up his driving license, right?
05:48Voluntarily, exactly.
05:50Because here it had been said, the family had said it,
05:53he had the suspicion, in fact, that he was still driving,
05:56and he voluntarily handed over the license to him to say, I don't drive anymore.
06:00I want to ask you, doctor, about what we were just talking about,
06:03which has to do with speed.
06:05At what speed do you think Mateoli was going at the time of the fact?
06:08Well, we happen to have a technical team,
06:11I myself am a sinister liquidation expert, I have a training in the field.
06:15We check with all the material elements that exist in the cause,
06:20because what I see, you have it available there,
06:22they have been looking at it and putting it on the screen right now.
06:26With the material elements that exist,
06:28we believe that the expertise carried out by the police expert is correct.
06:32So, but you also traveled at 53 km per hour?
06:36Actually, the red expertise travels less,
06:40and with the margin of uncertainty,
06:42we would be at 53 km per hour approximately.
06:46There may be a greater or lesser variation,
06:48but hey, that's what the red expertise,
06:50the material expertise in the place,
06:52was done on the same day,
06:54that is, apparently everything was done as per the procedure.
06:56He was not drunk, he was not drugged, he was not fast,
07:02what did he do wrong then?
07:04Well, it is negligence that is imposed on him,
07:08that is, that is why he has the face of a guilty person.
07:12We, as believers, are participating and trying to collaborate with the prosecutor,
07:18and we believe that she is working in the right way in the investigation,
07:22but always not discarding any hypothesis,
07:24providing the greatest amount of material that is possible, right?
07:28We have even provided some witnesses who would have also declared the cause.
07:34And what does the family expect, doctor?
07:37What would be justice for the family in this case?
07:41Well, justice, obviously, will never be complete in this situation,
07:45but the Code provides a sentence of imprisonment for this type of crime,
07:49that is, Article 84b, between 2 and 5 years,
07:52imprisonment and twice the time of investigation for the conviction,
07:56excuse me, for handling, which would be between 5 and 10 years.
07:593 and 6, doctor, sorry, but that was reformed ...
08:03Sorry, 3 and 6.
08:043 and 6, for the mothers of pain.
08:07Well, we are going to continue the case closely, doctor,
08:10we are very interested in knowing the opinion of the family with the indictment,
08:13so we will be connected.
08:15I thank you, I wanted to make a clarification too,
08:17because about the allowed speed,
08:20in that street, coincidentally, it is an avenue,
08:23that is why the allowed speed is 60 km per hour.
08:25Sure.
08:26So, well, it would also be within the parameters.
08:33Thank you, doctor, thank you very much for the information.
08:36We are in contact.
08:37Dr. Rugna, then, is Claudia's lawyer,
08:39the victim of the synesthesia,
08:41in which Nico Matioli participated,
08:44and we understand then ...
08:46He didn't see her.
08:47Let's see, he didn't see her.
08:48He didn't see her.
08:49Basically, he didn't see her.
08:50Notice that the lawyer ...
08:51That is, he was not exceeding the speed,
08:52he was not calculated, he was not drugged.
08:55He made a bad maneuver.
08:56Yes.
08:57He made a bad maneuver.
08:58But the aggravating ...
08:59An imprudent behavior.
09:00An imprudent behavior.
09:01Terrible, terrible.
09:02And the family, right?
09:03He always thinks about the victim's family,
09:04that he is going to have terrible parties,
09:07and well, this imputation comes out just at this time, right?
09:10That's why we were interested in knowing their opinion.