MK Hapus Presidential Threshold, Yance Arizona: Atasi Monopoli Elektoral
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00The Constitutional Court of Indonesia decided to abolish the Presidential Threshold
00:09or the minimum threshold of the percentage of presidential candidates and vice presidents
00:14in Article 222 of Law No. 7 of 2017
00:18on the voters because it contradicts the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in 1945.
00:26Regarding this, in Antara, Jakarta, on Friday, January 3,
00:30the State Legislative Council of Yancey, Arizona,
00:33sees that so far, large parties have dominated in determining presidential candidates and vice presidents.
00:39So, in his opinion, the abolition of the Presidential Threshold can overcome electoral monopolies
00:44and the adoption of Capres-Cawapres can be proposed by each political party
00:48without being tied to the 20% limit of seats in the DPR.
00:52Yancey, who is also the head of the Center for Democracy, Constitution, and Human Rights
00:57at the Faculty of Law of Gajah Mada University,
00:59assessed that this decision had a positive impact on the commitment to revive democracy
01:04for the future of the press and for the people.
01:08The people, as voters, have more options to determine the presidential candidates
01:15and vice presidents who are considered the most suitable to spread their aspirations.
01:21That is one of the positive impacts.
01:24Another positive impact is that this will open up more presidential and vice presidential candidates
01:30so that they can avoid the polarization that has been happening all this time.
01:34If there are only two candidates, in the experience of some voters,
01:37the public is also polarized into two,
01:41and that usually has a long impact, not just when the election is over.
01:48In addition, he said that other impacts of this decision still need to be considered
01:53during the ongoing process, which was then continued by the DPR.
01:57Previously, the removal of the presidential threshold was rejected by the MK 32 times.
02:03Yancey argued that this time the decision of the MK to abolish the decision
02:07can be justified by internal factors, such as the change in the composition of the MK judges
02:11and external factors, namely the momentum of Capres-Cawapres 2024.
02:16From Jakarta, Setian Kahar Vianna, Irvan Syah Nasution, Beritantara News Agency, Muartakan.