• 2 weeks ago
" if the 190 million case doesn't favor Imran Khan, negotiations will fail......" Rana Sana
Transcript
00:00After the EPICS committee, CMKP's Ali Ameen Gandapur has said that terrorism is something we are all concerned about.
00:07But they are calling someone else responsible for it.
00:15Since our government has gone, Imran Khan's government, terrorism has spread.
00:19Their policy is wrong.
00:20The responsibility of the army and the federal government is on the border.
00:23They have to do this.
00:24The responsibility of the federal government is mine, I own it.
00:26When people will come from the border and enter the city, then obviously they should
00:30come to the city and do their business.
00:32Where do these people come from?
00:33How do these people enter?
00:34So controlling the border, controlling the people on the border is their responsibility.
00:37They should fulfill their responsibilities.
00:39Mr. Pranav, you know, I also know that their direct accusation is on the army.
00:44Is this accusation correct?
00:46I believe that this is also extreme, that is, the word of injustice is small, this is
00:53injustice.
00:54It is injustice to say such a thing in this context or in this reference that you are
01:00seeing every day that how beautiful, young our officers are, who make a person jealous
01:12that the parents who have lost him, the sisters and brothers who have lost him, what happened
01:20to them?
01:21Major Zeeshan, who was getting married after 11 days, and there is a custom that they keep
01:36a day, so two days later he was about to go home for the wedding and his dead body went
01:44to Kasur.
01:46That Lieutenant Arsalan, who was the only brother of three brothers, his village was
01:54on the Murree side, and this is a matter of yesterday, it is a matter of 10 days ago, it
02:02is a matter of a month ago, every day there, in one day 16 of your young soldiers were
02:10martyred.
02:12So, despite this, to say that whose responsibility is it?
02:17How can more responsibility be fulfilled than this?
02:22Is there a greater vision than life that can be presented to fulfill any responsibility?
02:28And the conspiracies that have been happening, the way political gains and political gains
02:40have been made, the way people have been given permission to come here, those things are
02:50separate.
02:51But despite this, I keep myself to this extent that the army and the army officers and the
02:59soldiers, the great sacrifices they are making in this war of terrorism, then there is no
03:07other way to fulfill that responsibility.
03:10Well, I understand what you are saying, Mr. Rehna.
03:12There is no doubt that more than this, I mean, give your life, what more responsibility
03:15will you fulfill?
03:16But Mr. Rehna, let's come to the negotiations.
03:18You are part of that negotiation committee.
03:20This time, when the meeting was to be held on 2nd January, a written charter of demand
03:25had to come from the PTI.
03:27Now, that written charter of demand did not come.
03:30The next meeting is being said to come.
03:32But the leadership of the PTI is probably meeting with Mr. Imran Khan and trying to
03:38formulate that charter of demand properly in written form.
03:42So shouldn't they be meeting with Mr. Imran Khan on a regular basis so that all the discussions
03:48they have to have are completed?
03:50No, no.
03:51They should be given access.
03:54And I think they will be given access.
03:57There should be access.
03:59There should be meetings.
04:01And since the negotiations are in progress, I don't think there should be anything that
04:07creates a negative impression that we should do it.
04:11So, I think they should be given access.
04:14And I think they should be given access.
04:17And I think they should be given access.
04:20I don't think we should do it.
04:23It would have been great if they had given us their demands in writing.
04:29But now it seems, Mr. Rehman, that they have decided that on 6th January, an important
04:34case of 190 million pounds has to be decided.
04:37Are you seeing any effect of that decision on these negotiations?
04:44Look, we should not do it.
04:47Because no such thing has been decided in the negotiations.
04:52We did not say that you should first end your civil disobedience and withdraw, then we will
04:58have the negotiations.
05:00Or that you should withdraw this threat, then we will have the negotiations.
05:06We said that whatever you are doing, you should do it.
05:10Whatever is happening on the other side in the courts, that should also continue.
05:15But we should sit down and talk and try to find a solution to these things.
05:20If all this is correct, then there is no need for negotiations.
05:25Negotiations are being held to correct these things.
05:30So, if they have initiated a civil disobedience action, then they should do it.
05:37And if their case is going on in a court and that court has to make a decision, then they should do it.
05:43So, negotiations should not be affected by these things and they should be held.
05:49But if negotiations are stopped from the other side in such a situation, then I think that
06:00this thing will not be appropriate.
06:03And we hope that, as we discussed yesterday, that negotiations should not be stopped by these things.
06:11If they had given us their demands in black and white tomorrow, then we would have
06:17started the discussion on the meeting that is going to take place next week.
06:26But they have promised in the next meeting and we should hope that they will give us
06:31their Charter of Demand.

Recommended