• 14 hours ago
'लोगों का हक छीनने और शोषण करने के लिए आपको नहीं बनाया कलेक्टर',

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Sir, what is the case?
00:02This case is related to land confiscation.
00:05The petitioner was arrested in 1993.
00:11Rajesh Kumar Tiwari was not aware of this.
00:16He was an ordinary farmer, not a well-educated man.
00:20His land was confiscated, but he was not informed.
00:25He was never given notice of confiscation.
00:29He built a house on his land and continued farming.
00:34He lived on that land with his family.
00:37In February 2015, he was given a notice from the Housing Board.
00:46The surrounding land was given for the construction of a housing board colony.
00:53In February 2015, he received a notice.
00:57He was asked to vacate his house and land.
01:02He was given a 7-day notice to vacate his land.
01:07In those 7 days, the petitioner replied to the Housing Board.
01:16He said that he had built a house and was living with his family.
01:19He said that he was not aware of the confiscation of his land.
01:23He said that he was not aware of the confiscation of his land.
01:28In July 2015, he was given another notice.
01:32He was told that if he did not vacate his house and land within 7 days,
01:37he would be forced to vacate his land.
01:42The petitioner had no other option.
01:46In July 2015, he presented his petition to the High Court.
01:52The High Court asked the petitioner not to vacate his land.
01:57The petitioner asked the petitioner not to vacate his land.
02:00After the petitioner's case was closed,
02:05the High Court issued a final order to the petitioner
02:08that he should not vacate his land until the petition is over.
02:14The petitioner's case went on.
02:18The Housing Board represented themselves and presented their answer to the petitioner.
02:22However, the Collectors and Land Authorities have not responded.
02:29The petitioner was angry because they had spent Rs. 10,000
02:36on the Government and the OIC to present their answer.
02:40They did not respond.
02:42When we got the reply, we got such a reply that the complainant filed a complaint against us by submitting a rejoinder.
02:50He said that we are still interfering in this land and our house is built in it and we are living in it.
02:56He also submitted a complaint against us with his rejoinder.
03:00After that, the case was heard again in December, 19th December.
03:06And on 19th December, the government was instructed to bring the notification of Article 4 and 6 on record.
03:15If you don't bring it on record, then the collector will have to come.
03:19The case was fixed on 6th January.
03:22So, they submitted the notification of Article 4 and 6 in front of the court in record.
03:28But the court was not satisfied with that and was not satisfied with their argument.
03:33The court was not satisfied with that and the court said that the collector should come tomorrow at 10.30 with record.
03:42He should come with all the relevant original records.
03:46So, on behalf of the collector, there was a request for an exemption.
03:50That I should be released from this position because my husband's health is not good.
03:56In relation to that, they presented him with a doctor's certificate.
03:59But the collector was not satisfied with that.
04:01And he was instructed to be present in front of the court by 7 pm.
04:07Otherwise, there could be some action against him.
04:10So, due to such compulsion, the collector came at 4 pm.
04:14Additional Advocates General also argued on his behalf.
04:18But the court was not satisfied with that.
04:20And the next date of the case was fixed for 8th January at 2.30 pm.
04:27And it was instructed that the collector should be present.
04:30And in relation to that, they were scolded that how do you run this?
04:38You work for the public.
04:42And if you work in this way, then any action can be taken against you.
04:46The next day, on 8th January, the case was again fixed at 2.30 pm.
04:52And the collector and his advocates were present.
04:56The case was heard.
04:58After hearing the case, the court decided that the advocate's body will be with him.
05:04And the award that was announced in relation to that was lapsed.
05:08The advocate will not be removed from that land.
05:11And he will remain in that.
05:13If the collector or the housing board wants to take over this land again,
05:18then according to the new law of 2013, the new announcement should be issued.
05:25And he should be compensated at the new market rate.
05:30The advocate's advocacy was accepted.
05:34The collector was given a lot of advice.
05:36And Rs. 25,000 caste bill was imposed on him.
05:39This is how the case was settled.
05:41After 30 years, the advocates got justice.
05:4430 years ago, his body was removed.
05:46And he has not been compensated till date.

Recommended