• 2 days ago
During a House Financial Services Committee hearing on Tuesday, Rep. David Lynch (D-MA) spoke about the stability of 'stablecoins'.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Thank the gentleman.
00:01Gentleman yields back.
00:02Gentleman from Massachusetts, Mr. Lynch, the ranking member
00:05of the Digital Assets, Financial Technology
00:07and Artificial Intelligence Subcommittee is recognized
00:09for five minutes.
00:11Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
00:13Ms. House, currently just a couple
00:16of stable coins have about 90% of the market.
00:19Is that correct?
00:21Yes, sir.
00:22Yes, Congressman.
00:23So this market is susceptible to concentration?
00:27It does, yes, Congressman.
00:29So we're looking at Meta.
00:32Meta's got 3.9 billion subscribers
00:37across all its platforms, Instagram and WhatsApp,
00:42as well as Facebook.
00:46And Apple probably has a billion paid monthly subscribers.
00:53What would be the impact if both those firms came in
00:57and just established stable coins?
00:59What would happen to the competitiveness
01:01of the market here in stable coins?
01:05It's an interesting exercise.
01:07I think, first off, it depends on
01:09if there's a regulatory framework that would help
01:11to enable competition and enable protection
01:14for some smaller players to come in.
01:16But without protections against it, I think that the potential
01:20for them to come in and leverage very, very large market shares
01:24with their devices and applications and others,
01:26it's possible that they could take over.
01:28Of course, without protections,
01:30there's still very major players, especially foreign
01:32operating ones that have currently been operating
01:35without much transparency or consumer protection also
01:37that they'll be coming up against.
01:39And if they are able to operate in a fashion,
01:43well stable coins operate a lot like deposits.
01:46So that would break down the separation
01:50between banking and commerce, would it not?
01:52Yes, absolutely.
01:53That's also a major risk.
01:54If you start to conflate those
01:56and you don't have the kinds of protections that we do
01:58in the banking system for good reason to divorce
02:00and separate banking and commerce,
02:02then that would present those major challenges as well.
02:05Mr. Ginn, is that how you pronounce your name?
02:07I don't want to pronounce your name wrong.
02:09Sorry, it's Gwin.
02:10Gwin, I'm sorry.
02:11I'm sorry.
02:12First of all, thank you for your testimony to all the panelists.
02:16You mentioned a couple of times that stable coins should be
02:19as safe and as secure as FDIC insured deposits.
02:23But in the past several years, you know, I sit up here
02:27and I see the collapses.
02:28So we've had at least 20 stable coins just collapse.
02:32We've had every single major stable coin
02:35in the world de-pegged from the dollar.
02:38So we've watched as the Federal Reserve and FDIC had to go in
02:42and rescue Silicon Valley Bank.
02:45I mean, did that not happen?
02:48It certainly did.
02:49And I think the reason.
02:50Okay, I just, because this is the first time any
02:52of you have said that that happened.
02:55We, look, the idea of scientific method is
03:00when you try something and it doesn't work and it blows up
03:03and it causes people damage, you adjust
03:06and you develop improvements.
03:10But we keep doing the same thing over and over with stable coins.
03:13They keep blowing up.
03:15And now we want to.
03:17My time. Now we want to just expand that.
03:20And it just seems like it's inviting a disaster.
03:27I guarantee you, so I read the Genius Act, you know,
03:32over in the Senate.
03:34You know, I'm a little wary
03:35about anything called genius coming
03:36out of the United States Senate.
03:38But there were so many problems with that.
03:41And I'm hopeful that my colleagues, Mr. Hill
03:46and others will amend that vigorously
03:51because it had huge, huge problems.
03:54But, you know, the other piece of this is stable coins,
04:00especially if they offer interest.
04:02Do you support stable coins that offer interest
04:06that are actual deposits?
04:09Are you asking me that question?
04:10Yeah, yeah.
04:11I think if they have.
04:13Yes or no.
04:14It's pretty clear.
04:15Interest bearing stable coins.
04:17I think it's yes if they have appropriate
04:19and calibrated capital.
04:20That's what I was fearful of.
04:22So instead of traditional bank.
04:26Here's the difference.
04:28Stable coins, you know, it's going to take deposits
04:31and it's going to use those deposits as reserves, right?
04:35That's how this thing is going to work.
04:37A normal bank, and it's going to have
04:39to hold those for protection.
04:42A normal bank, traditional bank,
04:44would take those deposits and lend them out.
04:47Lend them out to small businesses, mortgages,
04:50and that type of activity.
04:52I'm afraid it's going to siphon off a lot of the credit market
04:56and will be using those deposits to back the stable coins
05:01to prevent disaster instead of putting that money to work.
05:05Ms. House, is that a legitimate concern?
05:09I think the concerns are founded
05:12in why bipartisan legislation
05:14on a good regulatory framework is critical.
05:16I yield back.
05:18Gentleman yields back.
05:18The gentleman from.

Recommended