Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 6 days ago
At a House DOGE Committee hearing on Tuesday, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) spoke about furniture purchases by the federal government under the Biden administration.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00I now recognize myself for five minutes of questions and I thank the witnesses for their
00:05testimony. Mr. Maroney, the title of your testimony is reducing the government's holdings
00:11could generate substantial savings and I agree with that. And thanks to the Trump administration
00:16we're finally seeing some savings, $400 million on leases according to the administration.
00:22Do you think the government's excess properties exist in part because federal agencies
00:27and the bureaucrats who run them have no incentive to move or to give up their space?
00:33Just why won't these agencies co-locate and downsize?
00:37So there's a number of reasons but certainly cultural reticence to sharing space is something we've identified in the past.
00:43Also inertia for lack of a better word. It's a space you've already had and there isn't as much incentive to move.
00:49It costs money to move out of space at times and agencies haven't always put that up front.
00:53There's a number of other reasons possibly too but certainly those are both valid reasons that they've brought up before.
00:58Those are reasons that have been brought up before.
00:59Right, except their actions are different. They certainly were ready to jump out of this building
01:03and leased a very expensive building on Pennsylvania Avenue.
01:07Recent presidents couldn't overcome that bureaucratic inertia.
01:11Yet President Trump and Doge ended almost 700 leases in just a few months. That's unbelievable.
01:19Has any other administration acted so quickly to reduce the federal footprint that you know of?
01:26Not that I'm aware of.
01:28Yeah, much needed though.
01:32Mr. Moroney, your testimony states that a GAO covert operation last year was successful about half the time in sneaking prohibited items past the guards and into federal buildings.
01:44I'm really interested in that. What sort of items did you sneak in? What dangers does this vulnerability pose?
01:53Right. So we snuck in three different items, a multipurpose tool with a knife, a baton like a baton you could use to attack someone with, and pepper spray.
02:01All those are prohibited items. All those are things you could cause real harm if you wanted to.
02:06And like you said, about half the time we were able to get that through. So that raises concerns.
02:10We only did 27 tests and got through in half the time. That suggests other items could be getting through at a greater level.
02:17But you got through half the time in 27 tests.
02:20Correct. And that also comports with FPS, the Federal Protective Services' own covert testing program.
02:25Wow. That's definitely terrifying. Thank you for that. I have a lot of death threats and several people have been convicted and served time in prison
02:35for planning to murder me. So I always appreciate the efforts on every single aspect of security to make sure that people that work within the federal government
02:46and the capital and visitors as well are safe. So thank you.
02:50Mr. Hart, I appreciate the work your organization has done in making the American people aware how the government spends Americans' hard-earned money,
02:59including this chart behind me here, shows a disgusting amount of federal spending on furniture, which is what you talked about.
03:08So how did you go about finding the Biden administration spent about $1 billion per year on furniture,
03:16while federal buildings set empty during COVID and federal workers work from home?
03:22Yeah, what we do, Chairman, is we have access to all federal spending through USAspending.gov.
03:28And that's a bill that I helped pass back in 2006.
03:32So we're able to do keyword searches and look at furniture, look for vendors even, and identify and keyword search things like recliners
03:40to identify and understand how much the federal government is spending on furniture.
03:45And it's really a scope of government problem issue, as I mentioned in my opening statement, is that when we decide to have a large scope,
03:53there is going to be a big cost of furniture.
03:55But it's a very useful way to think about and assess whether we ought to have this number of federal buildings.
04:02Yeah, Mr. Hart, we appreciate those efforts.
04:04In 2021, the CDC spent almost a quarter million dollars on solar-powered picnic tables.
04:10The CDC at the time was telling people to socially distance with masks and basically forcing a vaccine that many Americans didn't want.
04:19So what use would its employees have for this new picnic table that has quite the price tag?
04:27Yeah, it's quite expensive.
04:29And, you know, the social distancing guidelines suggested they shouldn't be seated at that table while they were spending $237,000 on that.
04:37Look at those seats. Look at those seats. That's not social distancing.
04:41No, they're quite close. There's a close proximity of those seats to the other person.
04:44Yeah, real quick, I've just got a short amount of time yet.
04:47I'd like to ask, just basically, just for the general audience, is $238,000 spent on solar-powered picnic tables at the CDC appropriate?
04:58I think the American people think that's disgusting.
05:01Is $700,000 spent by the SEC for their New York regional office conference room appropriate of taxpayer dollars?
05:08I don't think so. What about $6.5 million spent on high-end furniture to redecorate the EPE office?
05:16No. And then $284,000 in Herman Miller furniture for FEMA's headquarters conference center and appropriate use of taxpayer dollars?
05:27I would argue not. I'm definitely over time, so thank you, gentlemen.
05:31Thank you, gentlemen.

Recommended