Is the U.S. isolating itself before a global showdown? 🌎💥
In this deep dive, we explore Trump’s proposed tariffs and how they might build an economic wall around America 🧱🇺🇸 — just as the world teeters on the edge of major conflict. From trade wars to potential military tensions, is the U.S. preparing or setting itself up for disaster? 🔍
📉 Learn how tariffs could reshape global supply chains, ignite inflation, and test America's resilience.
💬 Join the conversation and share your thoughts below!
🚨 Subscribe for more hard-hitting geopolitical breakdowns!
#TrumpTariffs
#USIsolation
#GlobalConflict
#TradeWar
#TheNewAtlas
#EconomicWar
#Geopolitics2025
#TariffPolicy
#AmericaFirst
#USChinaRelations
#WorldWar3
#TariffWall
#USPolitics
#GlobalTensions
#EconomicCollapse
#NationalSecurity
#Trump2025
#GeopoliticalAnalysis
#USForeignPolicy
#WorldEconomy
In this deep dive, we explore Trump’s proposed tariffs and how they might build an economic wall around America 🧱🇺🇸 — just as the world teeters on the edge of major conflict. From trade wars to potential military tensions, is the U.S. preparing or setting itself up for disaster? 🔍
📉 Learn how tariffs could reshape global supply chains, ignite inflation, and test America's resilience.
💬 Join the conversation and share your thoughts below!
🚨 Subscribe for more hard-hitting geopolitical breakdowns!
#TrumpTariffs
#USIsolation
#GlobalConflict
#TradeWar
#TheNewAtlas
#EconomicWar
#Geopolitics2025
#TariffPolicy
#AmericaFirst
#USChinaRelations
#WorldWar3
#TariffWall
#USPolitics
#GlobalTensions
#EconomicCollapse
#NationalSecurity
#Trump2025
#GeopoliticalAnalysis
#USForeignPolicy
#WorldEconomy
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00I have written another article for New Eastern Outlook. It is titled Worst Case Scenario Trump
00:06Tariffs Walling U.S. Off Ahead of Wider World Conflict. A lot of people are looking at these
00:14tariffs and they're wondering what what is going on because at face value
00:19it doesn't really seem to make sense. And so what I went about doing was looking for a probable
00:27explanation for why the U.S. would seemingly be doing something that doesn't make sense. A lot
00:32of people just attribute it to the the random nature of President Donald Trump's mind and how
00:39it works. But I think if you're really looking deeply enough into all of this you know that
00:44President Trump isn't making any decisions at all on his own. This is all predetermined policy
00:49laid out in extreme detail well before he ever stepped foot into office. And so there is something
00:56much greater to all of this than just some some random poorly conceived policy blurted out by
01:05President Trump and his administration. So let's get into it. With the rollout of sweeping U.S. tariffs
01:11as always I'm going to read the article. I'm going to show you the sources that I'm citing and I will
01:17add additional information when and if necessary. So let's begin with the rollout of sweeping U.S.
01:22tariffs aim that nations worldwide economists and geopolitical analysts alike are astounded by what
01:28at face value looks like irrational self-sabotage attributed to incompetence within the White House.
01:35In reality the tariffs are a central pillar of bipartisan foreign trade and economic policy
01:41implemented first during the previous Trump administration continued and even expanded upon
01:45during the following Biden administration before being expanded further still under this current
01:51Trump administration. Rather than a random idea that formed in the mind of President Donald Trump
01:56himself or among those within his cabinet sweeping tariffs are the stated policy of unelected corporate
02:03financier interests articulated in depth within the pages of special interest funded think tank documents
02:10including Heritage Foundation's project 2025 paper under chapter 26 trade policy. I have talked about
02:17project 2025 often. It is produced by the Heritage Foundation. You come down here you can see right here
02:25the Heritage Foundation 2023-2024. This was before President Trump even stepped foot in office and you can see
02:32there's a whole table of contents. It covers absolutely everything. All of this about supposedly shutting down
02:39USAID and Voice of America. That is in here. This was all about streamlining these tools, consolidating
02:46them under the State Department, not eliminating them. That's what it says here and that is what the
02:51Trump administration almost verbatim did once in office. Everything in here about preparing for war
02:59with China, dumping the Ukraine conflict onto Europe, not to end it but to just get the Europeans to do
03:05America's dirty work for them. It's all in here. Every single thing the Trump administration is doing
03:11is articulated in this paper including tariffs under this section trade and the specific chapter is
03:22here. The link to this is in the video description below. You can read the entire chapter yourself. It is
03:2859 pages long, hundreds and hundreds of pages worth of documentation as part of Project 2025.
03:35This is where President Trump is getting his policies. They're not his policies. They are the
03:40deep state policies. The Heritage Foundation is one of several large corporate funded think tanks. These
03:46are corporate monopolies that run U.S. foreign and domestic policy no matter who is in the White House,
03:51no matter who controls Congress. This is how U.S. foreign and domestic policy is formed. These are the
03:57interests driving it. And these are the interests, the Trump administration, the Biden administration
04:02before it, President Obama, President Bush, so on and so forth. These are the interests they work for,
04:07which is why there is continuity of agenda. That is why even though the rhetoric will change from one
04:14presidency to the next, the same agenda is being pursued, just presented to the American people
04:19with different types of propaganda. The policy, far from a sound plan to re-industrialize America or genuinely
04:28balance America's trade deficit, is instead meant to maintain America as, and this is a direct quote from
04:34chapter 26, the world's dominant superpower. A lot of people out there are laboring under the delusion that
04:42President Trump wants to end American hegemony abroad and focus inward on America, make America great again.
04:48That's not what he's doing. Project 2025, he is ripping all of his policies from, is focused on
04:54maintaining the U.S. as the world's dominant superpower. Is it a rational and unsustainable,
05:00unobtainable objective that this is what these special interests are still pursuing? And that is why
05:06policies enacted under the previous Biden administration, now this Trump administration, reflect this.
05:11The paper claims that to maintain that global positioning and thereby best protect the homeland
05:19and our own democratic institutions, it is critical that the United States strengthens its manufacturing
05:26and defense industrial base at the same time that it increases the reliability and resilience of its
05:32globally dispersed supply chains that will necessarily require the on-shoring of a significant
05:37portion of production currently offshored by American multinational corporations. While this seems to
05:45at first suggest a general re-industrialization of America's economy, none of the actual measures
05:51required to do so are discussed with any serious attention, or any attention at all for that matter.
05:57Measures such as the sweeping education reforms and massive state investments in infrastructure and
06:03industry required to actually re-industrialize America. If you really wanted to re-industrialize
06:08America, if you wanted to balance the trade deficit with these other nations,
06:12you would have to look at your education system and completely reorganize it, not dismantle the
06:19Department of Education, which by the way is also a directive under Project 2025. That was not
06:25President Trump's idea. That was Project 2025. That is a deep state objective that President Trump
06:31was not obediently carried out or oversaw or presided over. The policies described within the pages of
06:38Project 2025 and now being implemented further under the current US administration are meant instead to
06:44disrupt global economic activity, including trade and industry, particularly those of China, while
06:49compelling industry abroad to be moved to the United States. So in other words, you're not revamping
06:56education, educating Americans, preparing them for high-tech jobs, revitalizing industry. You are creating
07:03chaos abroad, forcing industry abroad to transplant itself onto American shores, including with all of
07:11those workers at those factories abroad coming to the United States. And an example of this is
07:17semiconductor manufacturer TSMC, which is based on the Chinese island province of Taiwan, which was forced to
07:24move facilities to Arizona in the continental United States. A combination of poor infrastructure, weak supply
07:31chains, and a lack of skilled workers have caused massive budget and schedule overruns, as well as
07:37necessitating the movement of hundreds of workers from Taiwan to the United States to fill roles American
07:43employees are incapable of fulfilling themselves. Similarly, beginning in 2014, with the US-engineered overthrow of
07:51Ukraine's elected government and the triggering of a proxy war with the Russian Federation, subsequent sanctions
07:57applied by the US in Europe, and the deliberate destruction of the Nord Stream pipelines have crippled
08:02the latter's supply of cheap Russian hydrocarbons. This has forced European manufacturing to relocate to the
08:12United States as DW in its 2023 article in German industry migrating to the US. Noted. That is this article
08:21right here. And that article said, one is the increase in geopolitical tension. So again, American created chaos.
08:30Many German companies see the US as a safe harbor. Other reasons are the comparatively low energy costs and the very
08:38generous subsidies provided under the inflation reduction act. So the US government is providing
08:42subsidies for these companies to move over, plus the US destroyed the Nord Stream pipelines, making energy
08:50extremely expensive in Europe, and making at the time more expensive American energy cheaper relative to the now
09:00increased price of energy in Europe. In the long term, as more industry is forced to move from regions of the
09:07world like Asia and Europe to the United States to a combination of US tariffs and geopolitical sabotage,
09:13stress on America's insufficient infrastructure, supply chains, human resources, as well as inadequate
09:17education and healthcare systems will only increase. Even if sufficient resources are channeled into approving
09:24any or all of the above fundamental factors for transplanting industry to the United States, it will still
09:30take years to catch up. In the short term, as a now eight year spanning policy of imposing tariffs and
09:36triggering trade war has demonstrated, an already immense cost-to-living crisis is set to expand
09:43even further, impacting the lives of tens of billions of Americans already struggling with grocery bills,
09:48rent, fuel, healthcare, and education, and actually much more in it. And I have heard people claim that
09:55these most recent tariffs are going to cause short-term pain for the American people, but the fact is
10:03this pain has been ongoing for the last eight years. It started with tariffs under the Trump
10:07administration. The Biden administration kept every single one of those tariffs in place, just to show
10:12you how bipartisan all of this is. This is continuity of agenda. The Biden administration loaded additional
10:19tariffs on top of that, and now the Trump administration is placing even more tariffs on top
10:24of that. So the pain is just starting, has not even begun yet, and has already been going on for eight
10:30years. So it's not going to be short-term. We're talking about almost already a decade of of pain.
10:36So there's nothing short-term about it. Washington's obsession is with China, not with making America
10:42great again. The success the U.S. has achieved in undermining and stripping away European industry is
10:47almost certainly guiding a much larger and more ambitious policy worldwide ultimately in regards to
10:53China. Project 2025 lists a number of actions to be taken in regards to China specifically, including
11:00strategically expand tariffs to all Chinese products and increase tariff rates to levels that will block out
11:06made-in-China products and execute this strategy in a manner and at a pace that will not expose the U.S.
11:12to a lack of access to essential products like key pharmaceuticals. So they're trying to strangle out
11:17made-in-China products while somehow trying to find alternatives for these products, not necessarily
11:24American-made, but just alternatives except for Chinese products. The whole system that the U.S. created
11:31at the end of the Cold War was meant to exploit and subordinate all of these nations to the U.S.,
11:37including and especially China. It was supposed to be America's factory. The problem is that the Chinese
11:43people worked their way out from under that subordination and they began creating their own
11:48companies, not only able to do the same things American companies can do, but do it better and
11:53on a larger scale, more effectively, more efficiently, and for cheaper. In other words, out-competing the
11:59Americans, beating them at their own game. And so the U.S., instead of finding a way to compete fairly with
12:05China, they just want to strangle China out of existence. That's what this is about. This isn't about
12:09capitalism versus communism. This is about the U.S. losing at their own game and being sore losers at
12:15that. What else did Project 2025 recommend? Ban all Chinese social media apps such as TikTok, WeChat,
12:22which pose significant national security risk and expose American consumers to data and identity
12:27threat, which is all a lie. It is because U.S. social media platforms cannot compete with Chinese
12:32platforms. China is doing everything America can do better. So instead of finding a way to compete,
12:38we're just admitting that China is making better products. It is a larger country,
12:43larger industrial base, millions more graduates in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics
12:48every single year than the U.S. They are going to be bigger and better than the U.S. Just accept it,
12:55like every other country has for decades accepted that the U.S. was bigger and more powerful. Now it's
13:01America's turn to accept that there is a nation out there that is bigger, stronger, and better than it.
13:07This is reality, accepting reality. There's nothing wrong with that. Living on in denial and
13:14adopting a zero-sum game against a nation that is bigger and stronger and better than you is the
13:20definition of insanity. Obsession and insanity. It also suggests it systematically reduce and eventually
13:28eliminate any U.S. dependence on communist Chinese supply chains that might be used to threat national
13:34security such as medicine, silicon chips, rare earth minerals, computer motherboards, flat screen
13:39displays, and military components. Also significantly reduce or eliminate the issuance of visas to Chinese
13:47students or researchers to prevent espionage and information harvesting. So these were ideas that were
13:53floating around in the deep state think tanks that now the Trump administration and Congress are now rolling
13:59out and trying to implement. Right now, the last several months, every single one of these has been
14:04discussed, either implemented, attempted to have implemented, or are planning on implementing.
14:12All of which are either now U.S. policy or are being transformed into U.S. policy under the current Trump
14:17administration. China's manufacturing base has made everything from pharmaceuticals and everyday consumer
14:24products to construction materials and major infrastructure projects affordable for nations
14:28around the globe. Hundreds of millions of people are benefiting, billions of people are benefiting from
14:32this. Rapidly improving living standards globally. I live in Thailand. I can see this with my own eyes.
14:38The world collectively sees cooperation with China as an opportunity. Because of China's large population,
14:45which is larger than the G7 combined, its massive and still growing industrial base, and its world-class
14:51infrastructure, the U.S. sees China as a threat, not in terms of any sort of genuine national security
14:56concern, but in terms of maintaining America as, again, directly taken from Project 2025 and repeated
15:04by members of the Trump administration, the world's dominant superpower, maintaining America as the world's
15:11dominant superpower, as per Project 2025 and other policy papers sponsored by America's unelected corporate
15:16and financier monopolies. Such papers declare China as a serious existential threat, another direct quote
15:23from Project 2025, not to America as a nation state or to the American people, both of which would only
15:30benefit as the rest of the world has from cooperation with China, but to the deeply entrenched corporate
15:37financier monopolies no longer able to compete with not only Chinese goods and services, but those in nations
15:44rising alongside China everywhere from Latin America to Africa and across the whole of your Asia.
15:52So what is the worst case scenario? A lot of people are trying to figure out what the Trump administration is
15:56trying to achieve through these sanctions. Are they just blindly and officially trying to protect these deeply
16:05entrenched corporate financier monopolies from competition from around the globe? That is possible, but is there more to it?
16:12I believe that there is. While the most immediate and intuitive explanations for growing U.S. tariffs against nations worldwide
16:19stem from protecting uncompetitive but deeply entrenched corporate financier monopolies within the U.S., from increasing foreign
16:25competition or a specific strategy to contain China's growing economic influence worldwide, there is a much more concerning
16:32possibility being overlooked by many. The U.S. decoupling from a global economy it seeks to deliberately destroy through a combination of
16:40economic and actual warfare. The obvious and growing impact tariffs will have on the cost of living crisis in the United States
16:48represents a high and unsustainable cost politically, socially, and economically for the United States, so much so that little else besides
16:58anticipation ahead of a major conflict could justify such costs as acceptable.
17:05A lot of people believe, and this could be true, although U.S. elections are meaningless otherwise,
17:12that President Joe Biden suffered and Kamala Harris suffered in the last election because of the rising cost of living.
17:21And this was blamed on President Biden's economic policies. But what were his policies? His policies were maintaining
17:28all of the Trump tariffs and then adding more to it and then setting the stage for President Trump
17:33in his next term in office to add even more tariffs on top of that. So when you really think about it, this was a collective
17:41effort by both the Trump and Biden administrations, but President Biden got the blame because it was
17:48accelerating out of control under his administration. It continues to accelerate out of control under the
17:52Trump administration, but they still have the ability to blame it on the aftermath of the Biden
17:58administration. That is a window that will close very soon. Were the U.S. preparing for the deliberate
18:04destruction of the current global economic system or large-scale war with one or more of its declared
18:09adversaries decoupling itself from the global economy first on its own terms ahead of time, especially in terms
18:15of America's dependence on China for supply chains, including all throughout its military industrial base,
18:20would be a necessary prerequisite. So that is the most obvious reason these tariffs would be imposed in
18:28the way that they are. They are predicting, anticipating a global economic collapse that they want to wall the
18:35American economy off from ahead of time. It's like two ships, you want to ram your ship into their ship.
18:43They don't think that you would do that because that's insane. You have ordered the crew to shut
18:46all of the compartments, all the watertight compartments in your ship, ahead of ramming this
18:51other ship, hoping that they didn't even think about doing it because they didn't even think you would be
18:55crazy enough to do this in the first place. When you ram into that ship, you will do serious damage
19:01to your ship, even critical damage, but their ship will be sunk altogether. You will come out on top even
19:06though you will have sustained serious damage. This is an analogy to what the U.S. is doing with these tariffs,
19:12not just tariffs, but its general global policy of sowing chaos, death and destruction,
19:18instability worldwide among both its adversaries and its supposed allies.
19:23The above mentioned example of semiconductor manufacturer TSMC building a factory in Arizona
19:28is admittedly a means of hedging against the possibility of war destroying TSMC facilities in
19:33Taiwan itself. U.S. policy makers have even stated publicly that if China itself did not destroy the
19:40facilities, the U.S. would deliberately do so to deny China access to them. And I'm not kidding,
19:46there were literally articles like this in the Business Insider, U.S. would destroy Taiwan's
19:51semiconductor factories rather than letting them fall into China's hands, former national security
19:55advisor says. And Elbridge Colby, who is now getting again another position within this current Trump
20:03administration and had a position in the previous Trump administration, he has said
20:06things like this over and over again. There was a paper published by the U.S. Army War College in 2021
20:14titled Broken Nest Deterning China From Invading Taiwan. And it would explain, and that's this paper right here,
20:25it would explain the United States and Taiwan should lay plans for a targeted scorched earth strategy that
20:30would render Taiwan not just unattractive if ever seized by force, but positively costly to maintain.
20:36This would be done most effectively by threatening to destroy facilities belonging to the Taiwan Semiconductor
20:42Manufacturing Company, TSMC, the most important chip maker in the world and China's most important supplier.
20:48So they're talking about they're going to save Taiwan by scouring the surface of Taiwan of all industry,
20:55infrastructure and human life. Sounds, sounds, it sounds pretty drastic. So when people say,
21:01Brian, it sounds kind of drastic to suggest that these tariffs are meant to decouple from the world economy
21:06before deliberately trying to destroy it, that they literally have a strategy like this that they have
21:12articulated publicly and over and over again in regards to Taiwan as a microcosm. And that's what I say.
21:20This represents a microcosm of much wider preparation spurred on by this most recent and otherwise
21:26unnecessarily extreme tariff policy. The tariffs and associated policies targeting China specifically
21:32not only serve to help minimize the impact on the US itself if and when military conflict begins,
21:38it may be believed it can even help weaken China beforehand. As drastic as this sounds,
21:44it should be remembered that the US is already currently engaged in a massive military buildup versus
21:49China and the Asia Pacific region. Again, US forces, tens of thousands of them,
21:53are closer to Chinese shores than they are to America's own shores. The US has also been engaged
22:00in years of undeclared proxy war with China through the use of terrorists and militants across Eurasia,
22:05used to target and destroy Chinese Belt and Road Initiative infrastructure, engineers, Chinese engineers
22:11working on BRI projects and local security attempting to protect them. The US is developing and deploying new
22:17weapons designed specifically for a near future conflict with China. And this use of terrorists
22:24against Chinese Belt and Road infrastructure, this has been taking place for years and years in
22:30southwest Pakistan, in a region called Balochistan. And the US is fighting a dirty war against Myanmar,
22:37and the militants it's using to do so have repeatedly targeted Chinese investments and Belt and Road
22:43Initiative infrastructure. So there's already a hot proxy war taking place between the US inflicted upon
22:53China. And China has not reacted in kind to the US. It is not waging its own proxy war against the US.
23:01Not only that, the US is preparing for a very particular type of conflict with China, one
23:06targeting Chinese maritime shipping worldwide, rather than taking on the Chinese military itself,
23:12along or within its shores and borders. Several major steps have already been taken by multiple US
23:19presidential administrations, including the Obama administration, now two Trump administrations,
23:24and the previous Biden administration in regards to what would be a worldwide blockade of Chinese
23:28maritime shipping. And people have said, Brian, if the US blocks Chinese maritime shipping worldwide,
23:33that would implode the entire global economy. Well, now you can see why the US is trying to wall
23:38itself off from the entire global economy, not just China, Russia and its declared adversaries, but also
23:45Europe, Latin America, other countries that it claims are its allies. The Obama administration's
23:52pivot to Asia began the transformation of America's military forces from one organized around
23:57the decades long war on terror to a fighting force tailored for conflict with peer and near peer
24:02competitors. During the first Trump administration, the US withdrew from arms control treaties, allowing
24:07for the development and deployment of treaty violating missiles ranging from anti-ballistic missile
24:11defenses to intermediate and long range missiles now being deployed across the Asia Pacific. During the
24:16Biden administration, the entire US Marine Corps, I pointed this out many times before, this is a BBC article
24:22about it from 2023, was transformed from a combined arms expeditionary fighting force to one custom
24:29tailored specifically for anti-shipping missions in the Asia Pacific region, replacing its tanks and
24:34infantry forces with anti-shipping missile forces through the creation of marine literal regiments
24:40designed for literal maneuver and sea denial operations amid peer and near-peer conflict. The US Air Force had
24:47also begun implementing strategies during the Biden administration, continuing under this current Trump
24:52administration, including its Agile Combat Employment Strategy to disperse US Air Power across the Asia
24:59Pacific region among larger numbers of air bases, and this includes building new air bases to achieve
25:05this, to make it more difficult for China to target and destroy US air power in the event of armed conflict.
25:11And in just the last several months, in addition to the growing US military presence across the Asia
25:15Pacific region, the current Trump administration has taken drastic measures to choke maritime shipping
25:20globally by expanding US military forces in the Middle East, targeting both the Red Sea and the Strait of
25:26Hormuz, and creating a pretext to do so in both accounts, fighting Ansar Allah in Yemen and this military
25:34buildup against Iran. The potential annexation of Greenland, specifically citing Russian and Chinese
25:41shipping as an impetus, as well as the seizure of the Panama Canal specifically to counter China. So you can see,
25:48the Trump administration is openly and with absolute indifference to how insane it sounds,
25:54is just talking about seizing areas around the globe to control these choke points and eventually
26:01close them off to Chinese shipping. It is so obvious that this is what they're doing. They have put all of
26:06the pieces in place and it only makes sense if this is what they were putting all these pieces in place to do.
26:12While a global tariff policy to wall off the US economy from its own premeditated destruction
26:19of the global economy is a drastic policy, the complete reorganization of US military forces,
26:24specifically for war with China, along with the seizure of key maritime choke points worldwide,
26:29are equally drastic and make sense only as part of a strategy to precipitate that destruction.
26:35Empire and terminal decline throughout human history has suffered from dangerous desperation.
26:39In the 21st century, the US represents a modern-day empire in terminal decline,
26:43one armed with nuclear weapons, a global spanning military, and in control of global economic tools
26:49capable of destroying the entire global system, rather than concede its role placed above it.
26:55The goal would be to survive the controlled demolition of the global order it has presided over
27:00for decades, and emerge the strongest player best positioned for establishing itself once again as
27:06the world's dominant superpower. For the rest of the world, and the emerging multipolar world order,
27:13it is pursuing a combination of deterrence, alternative economic, trade, and financial systems,
27:18and an opposing strategy of walling off and protecting economies and populations from American
27:23economic and actual warfare will be required. The US is preparing to subject its own population,
27:30as well as those of its supposed allies, to immense long-term economic, social, and political pain.
27:36The cost of living crisis in the US will only grow worse. The US hopes that it can endure economic
27:42pain and disruption at home and abroad better than the emerging multipolar world can. Multipolarism
27:48survival will depend on proving otherwise. And that's where my article ends. I think that is a good
27:55place to end it. If you think you have a better theory as to why the US is imposing such global
28:03spanning tariffs, essentially creating economic chaos and walling itself off from the rest of the
28:11world, if you think you have a better theory as to why the US is doing that, please share it in the
28:17comments section below. I would really love to see that and consider it. In the meantime, we'll just have
28:23to keep a close eye on all of this. And remember, if you are not looking at the policy papers,
28:30that all of these administrations, regardless of being Democrat or Republican, left or right,
28:35if you're not looking at these policy papers, and if you're not listening to the congressional
28:39hearings that take place every single month, often bringing in people from these think tanks to ask
28:47questions of, then you are attempting to do geopolitical analysis, almost as if you were
28:54trying to read tea leaves, it is almost impossible to know what is happening just based on public
29:01statements made by politicians we all know are serial liars. You have to look at the policy papers,
29:08you have to listen to the hearings. The US empire is too large to keep secret. These policy papers are
29:14not secret. They are published publicly. These hearings are done publicly. They have YouTube
29:19channels that cover these hearings for free. You can listen to the whole thing. They know the public
29:24won't listen though, which is a kind of a way of hiding all of this out in the open, knowing no one's
29:32going to look at it or consider it. And people's emotions are always going to sway them to a greater
29:38extent than the actual facts, the blueprints that are laid out for US empire for now and into the future.
29:46I really would like people to consider spending a little bit more time looking at those policy papers
29:54and listening to these hearings, hearing it for yourself, and then drawing your conclusions from
30:01that. And so if you're going to share a theory with me in the comments section, please make sure
30:05that it is based on policy papers and on congressional hearings and not on public statements that are meant
30:14to manipulate us and deceive us. If you thought this video was useful, please like and share. Think
30:19about subscribing. It's free to do. It helps the channel grow. Check the video description below for
30:23all the places you can find and follow my work. All of the sources that I cited in this article,
30:28including the link to the article itself will be in the video description below as will be ways you
30:33can help support my work. I do not monetize any of my social media platforms. If ads pop up,
30:40feel free to skip them. They're not helping me out at all. If you do want to help support my work,
30:44please do so through buy me a coffee and also Patreon to everyone who has been helping out,
30:50whether it's a one-time donation, donations month to month, or if you have no resources to spare and you're
30:54just helping share my work with others. That is all greatly appreciated. That is what makes this work
30:59possible. So thank you. And as always, thank you for watching.