Patrick discusses the new UFO whistleblower "Ben" and his claims. He recently came out on the Youtube channel 'Disclosure Team with Vinnie Adams'.
#aliens #uap #ufonews #ufos #ufo #disclosure #alien #uapnews #orbs #nhi #news24 #news
#aliens #uap #ufonews #ufos #ufo #disclosure #alien #uapnews #orbs #nhi #news24 #news
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00What's up, Edders? Patrick here with Vetted.
00:03Apparently, a brand new whistleblower has come out who's keeping his identity secret.
00:08He goes by the name Ben, and he recently was a guest on Disclosure Teams podcast with Vinny Adams.
00:16And in it, he kind of details some of his story, and we're going to go over that today.
00:20Again, this is a brand new whistleblower who's never come out before.
00:24And again, he is keeping his identity hidden at the moment.
00:28So his voice is distorted, and his face is blurred.
00:32But we've got a few different clips to go over to give you an idea of, you know, what he's whistleblowing about exactly.
00:40And I'll put a link in the description to the full interview if you want to check it out.
00:43I highly recommend it.
00:44Vinny is a great interviewer and well worth watching.
00:49Now, one of the biggest takeaways I took from this, in my opinion, is what he had to say about Sean Kirkpatrick,
00:55who was the head of AERO, right?
00:58The Pentagon's office to study UFOs.
01:01He no longer is there, but what the implications of what this gentleman, Ben, is saying changes everything.
01:10If true, of course.
01:12Let's jump into this and see what it's all about.
01:14Do me a favor, vetters.
01:15Hit that like button.
01:16That really helps out the videos.
01:18And of course, if you're not already subscribed, hit that subscribe button.
01:20And I put out new videos every week about the UFO phenomena.
01:24Let's dive in.
01:25Now, at the beginning of the interview, Vinny Adams from Disclosure Team has a disclaimer that I do want to read out
01:31because I think it helps just kind of keep everything in context.
01:35So, here it is.
01:36In this interview, you'll be hearing from a whistleblower who served within the Department of Defense.
01:41His name has been changed, his voice has been altered, and his face blurred to protect his identity.
01:46I know some of you might immediately think, this is just another trust-me-bro situation, and I get that.
01:52It's healthy to approach things critically, but here's the reality.
01:56This individual has shown immense courage in coming forward to share what he knows,
02:00despite the risks to his career and personal life.
02:03He has been vetted, not just by me, but by others I trust.
02:07We've had extensive conversations, done our due diligence, and we're confident that what he's saying is worth listening to.
02:14While he hasn't yet provided physical evidence that could be made public,
02:18the information he offers contributes to a growing picture that many of us are trying to piece together.
02:23You can take this for what it is.
02:25Believe it, question it, scrutinize it, just do it with respect.
02:29We're not claiming to have all the answers, we're just trying our hardest to ask the right questions
02:33and give people a platform to speak.
02:35Thanks for watching, and for keeping the conversation moving forward.
02:38Vinny, Disclosure Team.
02:40Now, let's get to this first clip from Ben.
02:43Ben.
02:44How did you first come into contact with information about UAPs?
02:49First off, I want to thank you again, Vinny, for the opportunity to be on the show
02:54and for the, I guess, dual-purpose mode of speaking out about this.
03:01I think it's the biggest issue of our times,
03:03but also I want to back up fellow whistleblowers and people who came forward like Lou and Dave
03:09and Ryan Graves and Alex Dietrich, Jeff, and a whole bunch of other folks who have come forward.
03:17People in the past, from the Cold War era up until today, deserve respect,
03:23and I think that they need to be valued, and people need to listen to them.
03:27I'm just one voice who wants to do what I think is necessary to help back them up.
03:32And I'm very proud and honored to do that.
03:36In terms of UAP, I was able to see that both in my personal life.
03:43I won't give a time frame for that, but both in my personal life and then, you know,
03:50talk with people about it when I served active duty and then as a contractor after I left active duty.
03:55So I served active duty.
03:58I won't name the branch for security reasons, but then as also as a contractor after I left active service
04:03and served in that capacity and supported the U.S. government for a number of years.
04:10And did your role require any high-level security clearances?
04:18I'm not sure I should get into the level of clearances, but it wasn't high.
04:21I did require a security clearance.
04:26I just don't want to touch on the level of the UAP clearance just for operational security and personal security reasons.
04:33Was that clearance that you did have, was it enough to be able to access systems where information, data, videos,
04:41that kind of thing of UAP existed?
04:44Yes.
04:46Okay.
04:46So were you directly involved in any UAP-related programs or did you just come across the information incidentally?
04:55I came across it incidentally, but I was heavily involved with talking with people who had both an interest in it
05:01and are connected second or third hand to people who, for example, are named in Ross Coulthard's book.
05:10I won't name the band there, but one of the code names that he uses,
05:15I know somebody who knows that person or a friend of that person.
05:19So it sounds like he doesn't have any direct connection, but sort of, you know, tangential connections.
05:25And maybe more of his story will come out later on, to be honest.
05:29I get it.
05:30I think a lot of people are just going to be miffed by this, right?
05:35He's not showing his face.
05:36He's not, he's covering his voice.
05:38He's not really talking about anything in particular that he's actually blowing the whistle on.
05:45So, but, you know, he is coming out and speaking and he has been verified behind the scenes.
05:50So maybe with time, this is kind of just a test of waters to see what it'll be like, you know,
05:56if he does come out and put his face and name out there, right?
06:00Like other people have done, right?
06:02So I get it, right?
06:04I totally get it.
06:05And, you know, we'll have to wait and see, to be honest with you.
06:10But there's more to what he had to say, right?
06:13So here's him talking a little bit about other whistleblowers who have come out and put their face and their name out there, right?
06:21And what he has to say about them and has he spoken with any of them?
06:26Let me ask you about the other whistleblowers, David Grush, Jake Barber, you know, spring to mind.
06:30Have you spoken with these individuals and also if you have to what level and what they've said, you know, you can verify or back up?
06:39I have been in contact with Lou Elizondo.
06:43I'm not going to say what type of connection or calls or emails or what.
06:50I'm not going to do that.
06:52But I've been in contact with him.
06:54I've had also contacts with Jake Barber and his team.
06:59And those were successful and very informative.
07:03You know, this is, like I said before, this is a one-team, one-fight effort.
07:06It might be somebody who's been working this issue for 30 years or longer.
07:12Or it might be somebody who's at a much lower level and not as well-versed and experienced in terms of their longevity, in terms of disclosure.
07:24For me, myself, both personal and others, people can look at this and say, well, he may not have as much experience as, say, Jay Stradner or Lou Elizondo.
07:43But, you know, like I said, this is one-team, one-fight thing.
07:47And I've been in touch with multiple people, both subject matter experts, military witness veterans, VUAP, who have seen that, people who were, for example, civilians and so on.
08:02And it's just too much overwhelming evidence that I have both been a part of and able to see with my own eyes or talk with people who have seen it.
08:13And just so people know, I did relay this information to Congress, and I was happy to do it because I think it's a civic duty of mine to do so.
08:24You know, even members of Congress are having a hard time trying to get to the bottom of this.
08:29I was told by staffers that I should help recruit other members of Congress.
08:36Well, that's not necessarily my duty.
08:37I'll try to persuade as much as I can.
08:39And even members on the Hill are having a hard time getting to the ground truth because they're being stonewalled every step of the way.
08:46So I think it sounds like, you know, he's spoken to some of these people, which I did try to verify, and I didn't get any responses back as of yet to verify.
08:54Have he spoken to Luis Elizondo?
08:56Has he spoken to, actually, Jake Barber, right?
08:58So I don't know.
08:59If I get an update, I'll let y'all know.
09:01But, you know, it sounds like he has gone to Congress and spoken to them, right, about this.
09:07And it sounds like he has his own personal sighting that he is kind of going around with, right?
09:14But like I said at the beginning of the video, something he says about Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, who was the head of Arrow, the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office, which, again, is the Pentagon's office to study UFOs, right?
09:27But what he has to say about him is mind-blowing if it's true, right?
09:33That's the problem here.
09:34There is no physical evidence or any evidence whatsoever at this point to back up any of these claims, but he is coming out with the story.
09:42So I do say take it with a grain of salt, but I think that's kind of a given, right, until evidence is provided.
09:49I'm sure Ben would feel the same way if someone was just telling him a story without providing any evidence to him, right?
09:56So, again, happy to hear the data and happy to hear the testimony.
10:00I can decide what to do with it, right, just like you can as well.
10:02And, again, I'll put a link in the description if you want to go check out the full interview.
10:06He says a lot more things, but this part in particular is the part that stuck out to me the most.
10:12So take a listen.
10:14Just with regards to the videos that you've seen there, you mentioned you'd seen orbs coming out of the water,
10:19and I believe we had this conversation privately about a specific case that you kind of went into a bit more detail.
10:24Are you able to sort of talk us through that case?
10:28It's in a very, I don't necessarily know if I should say the area, but it's in a very highly contested part of the world,
10:38a very flashpoint-prone area of the world.
10:43What I mean by that is geopolitical flashpoints.
10:45And so, right now, you're looking at a lot of activity in that neck of the woods because of the possibility of future military operations.
10:58I will say that this was laterally, maybe directly across from a nuclear facility that this country operates,
11:06but it was in a body of water that multiple nations can traverse.
11:12Like I said, it was in a very highly economically and strategically important area of the world,
11:19seen and tracked by U.S. assets.
11:22And this was about maybe 10 or more minutes long, tracked for the whole time, multiple orbs.
11:29And, you know, this is the type of thing.
11:33They say they want to have a true and honest conversation about it.
11:37And, for example, agencies like Arrow were set up not to resolve the cases in favor of the Pentagon,
11:43which is what they're doing, but to resolve it in favor of true scientific investigations,
11:48both before Congress and to the American people.
11:51And what they're doing is resolving it in favor of the Pentagon.
11:56I can, I will just say, on the record, and people out there have suspected it,
12:03but Sean Kirkpatrick was read into parts of the legacy program,
12:08both before and concurrently with his leadership of Arrow,
12:12directly against the mandate that was set up by law for the Arrow director, Arrow Dur,
12:18to have no ties to said legacy program.
12:22So if that's true, if Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, who was the former head of the Arrow office, right,
12:29the all-domain anomaly resolution office to study UFOs, right,
12:33given money by the Pentagon,
12:36allegedly he was read into the UFO legacy program,
12:40which is a conflict of interest, a huge conflict of interest,
12:45if this is true, of course.
12:47There's no evidence provided.
12:48It's just this, you know, hidden identity whistleblower saying this, right.
12:55I mean, that changes everything about Arrow, the office, everything.
13:00I mean, it's just, one, it confirms there is a UFO legacy program.
13:04Two, it confirms that, you know,
13:06they were setting up this sort of facade of an office, right, Arrow,
13:11to sort of pretend like they're looking into UFOs, but they're not really.
13:14They're just a magnet to bring out whistleblowers and make them feel safe, come in,
13:18and now they're like, boom, now we know who you are, right?
13:21So kind of a honeypot situation, if you will.
13:24Again, if this is true.
13:26So let me know what you think in the comments.
13:28You think this is true about Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick?
13:31Let me know.
13:32Now, one last little clip from this interview is this gentleman, Ben,
13:36talking about why exactly is he speaking out now?
13:39It's something that you can't really discredit because there's just so much overwhelming evidence
13:45that to do so would just be throwing out not only what we currently have and have concealed,
13:53but just decades of overwhelming evidence and eyewitness statements and testimony
13:59by thousands of people, not just in the United States, but around the world.
14:03And so to circle back a little bit, it's just an overwhelming thing in terms of the corpus of evidence,
14:13the body of evidence, and I just feel very strongly about it's why I'm speaking out today.
14:19All right, so look, I do have a few things to say here, and I guess I am going to be a little critical,
14:25and it's more just my opinion on things.
14:27Look, I was recently a guest on Vinny Adams' podcast last week, right,
14:32and he had kind of told me after the interview that this was going to be coming out.
14:37I didn't say anything.
14:38He didn't give me any details, and I didn't ask because I don't want to know if I'm being honest.
14:43I don't want anything I can't really repeat, right?
14:46I don't like holding on to secrets, nor do I want whistleblowers coming to me
14:50and trying to come out on Vetted because it just seems a little unusual to go to, you know,
14:57podcasters like myself to come out.
14:59If you have all this evidence and you are this big whistleblower,
15:02why wouldn't you go to some mainstream outlet with that evidence?
15:05Because that's what they would require for them to put you on the air.
15:09They need to really vet you properly, right, with the right resources.
15:13And I think that's kind of the issue here, and I would love to talk to Vinny more about this, right?
15:18But does he think that that's really worth it, right?
15:21Like how many resources does Vinny and maybe other people he works with have to really vet somebody at this level, right?
15:30I know I don't, right?
15:32It takes a lot of resources and a lot of money, right, to actually vet,
15:36and I think that can be a little bit of an issue.
15:40But at the same time, letting people come out and tell their story, there's nothing wrong with that,
15:45and we can discuss this civilly and respectfully, which is what I'm doing now.
15:49So, you know, I find this all very interesting.
15:52And look, I tell you what, I think what would be a good idea is for me to invite Vinny on the podcast
15:56and see if we can have a conversation about all of this.
15:59Because I do have bigger questions that have nothing to do with this whistleblower,
16:03but just whistleblowers in general coming out on, you know, UFO podcast, right?
16:09If they really do have all of this proof and evidence, right?
16:13Now, granted, he did go talk to Congress, and Congress even asking him to help convince other members of Congress.
16:19So maybe there is something there, but why UFO podcast?
16:23Is it just that podcasts have become a new medium and it's easier?
16:26Is it just come out here first, you know, small time and then work your way up?
16:31I mean, I don't know.
16:32I'm just asking.
16:32I'm just curious about all this.
16:34I always wonder, I never, you know, information that comes down in the UFO community, I'm always happy about it
16:39because I can do whatever I want with it.
16:41But I always ask why.
16:43Why is that person telling me that information?
16:46And what do they want me to do with that information?
16:49Are they trying to activate me in some way, a call to action, right?
16:53And who put them up to it, right?
16:55There's always that.
16:56And then, of course, asking for physical proof, something to back up their claims,
17:00not just other people saying, yeah, he's credible, he's legit.
17:04No, no, no.
17:04You need more than that at the end of the day to really be taken seriously.
17:09But, again, always happy when people come out with a story and I'm always happy to listen.
17:14So, again, full link in the description.
17:17Go check it out.
17:19Again, Vinny's a great interviewer, so it's a great watch for sure.
17:23And you can learn a lot from it.
17:24So, anyway, we'll see you guys in the next video, Vedders.
17:27Thank you so much for watching.
17:29Remember, every day's a gift, y'all.
17:31Peace!
17:34Peace!
17:35Peace!
17:36Peace!
17:37Peace!
17:38Peace!
17:39Peace!
17:40Peace!
17:41Peace!
17:42Peace!
17:43Peace!
17:44Peace!
17:45Peace!
17:46Peace!
17:47Peace!
17:48Peace!
17:49Peace!
17:50Peace!
17:51Peace!
17:52Peace!
17:53Peace!
17:54Peace!
17:55Peace!
17:56Peace!
17:57Peace!
17:58Peace!
17:59Peace!
18:00Peace!
18:01Peace!