Henry Kissinger died at 100 years old November 30. In an exclusive interview, he shared some of his views on the world and how he wants to be remembered.
Category
đŸ˜¹
FunTranscript
00:00 How I live to be 100, I don't know.
00:05 I didn't aim for it.
00:09 - But you're still enjoying it.
00:12 - You know, when you reach my age,
00:15 a certain serenity descends on you
00:20 because you can have no ambitions for the future.
00:27 So you have to do the right thing
00:32 'cause you can damage yourself very much.
00:37 - You became famous as a politician
00:39 for the idea of realpolitik.
00:41 That's a very pragmatic approach of politics.
00:44 - I'm an idealist who believes, however,
00:52 that ideals have to be related to practical possibilities
00:57 or that practical actions have to be inspired by ideals.
01:05 I believe today, if one wants to solve the problems
01:11 of this world, that one has to be inspired by visions.
01:18 The invasion of a country, taking off hostages,
01:23 killing some hostages, inflicting over 1,000 casualties,
01:30 that this could be believed to be possible
01:41 in the international system is amazing.
01:47 Now, here we have an attack on Israeli territory itself
01:52 whose purpose can only be to mobilize the Arab world
02:00 against Israel and to get off the track
02:05 of peaceful negotiations.
02:10 There has to be some penalty.
02:13 I think Israel has no choice except to invade Gaza
02:18 and to try to put this kind of relationship to an end.
02:24 - You have met in your political life
02:32 many leaders several times, Mao, Brezhnev, Putin,
02:37 other autocrats, dictators, populists.
02:40 Which leader was the most scary personality
02:45 that you have ever met?
02:47 - I don't like the word scary.
02:50 - Or dangerous.
02:52 - Well, in terms of capability, I would say Mao.
02:56 - He killed almost 90 million people.
02:58 Mao is still celebrated in China.
03:01 - He would kill what was needed to achieve his objectives.
03:06 - You have met Xi Jinping several times.
03:10 Would you say that he has changed his personality
03:14 and we have to deal with a different,
03:16 more autocratic Xi today than a couple of years ago?
03:21 - I think the early Chinese leaders that we met--
03:25 - Deng Xiaoping.
03:26 - Like Deng Xiaoping were easier to deal with
03:32 because for them, accommodation to the international system
03:39 was of prime importance in order to build their economy.
03:44 - How optimistic are you for the future of democracy?
03:48 - I think democracy is in trouble.
03:51 Now the life of people changes dramatically
03:57 and the inequalities of income are more obvious
04:07 than they were in previous periods.
04:09 So that the need for compromise and for understanding
04:16 which you and I believe are central
04:28 to a democratic system are in great danger.
04:34 And that in the West and in the rest of the world,
04:39 the easiest way to seize power
04:44 is by control of the military
04:48 and by control of government
04:53 through authoritarian means.
05:04 And once power is enjoyed,
05:08 people are very reluctant to leave it.
05:12 - Henry, from the perspective of a 100-year-old person,
05:17 are Biden and/or Trump too old for office?
05:22 - Biden is an elected president
05:29 and I have no,
05:32 I don't agree with some of his policies,
05:39 but I don't attack him.
05:47 - Should there be, instead of a minimum age
05:51 for an American president, perhaps a maximum age?
05:55 - Look, let me answer your question this way.
05:59 The point of view that I represent
06:08 and that I have explained to you
06:10 has no candidate in the presidency now.
06:15 But on issues of national interest,
06:23 I have supported Biden in the Ukraine war.
06:28 So he's a different phenomenon from Trump,
06:32 with whom I also have had friendly relations.
06:36 But Trump has been so focused on himself
06:41 that I think he would find it very difficult
06:44 to unify the country.
06:50 - Which political decision that you took in your career
06:54 would you decide differently today?
06:59 - You know, I'm often asked that question.
07:02 I think the directions I wouldn't change,
07:07 but there might be tactical,
07:10 there are tactical decisions along the way
07:14 that prove strong,
07:17 like my proclamation of the year of Europe was premature.
07:22 And therefore,
07:26 in the Vietnam War that is always mentioned,
07:34 my overriding conviction was
07:40 not to throw the government that had fought with us
07:46 to the absolutists.
07:48 And I thought we had to preserve this government
07:55 that we had created,
07:57 and that turned out to be incompatible
08:01 with our domestic politics.
08:04 But if we had acted otherwise,
08:07 and by we I don't mean me alone,
08:10 or me primarily,
08:13 but if America had acted otherwise,
08:17 and thrown South Vietnam to the wolves
08:23 in any administration,
08:27 it would have undermined the credibility of our alliances.
08:32 So,
08:40 should we have gotten out earlier?
08:43 It's hard to say because our opponents
08:47 would permit us to get out earlier
08:52 only on conditions
08:55 that would have looked
08:58 like the absolute weakness
09:03 of the United States,
09:07 and inability to protect them.
09:11 - Henry, you could make a political decision,
09:14 and it would be immediately executed
09:17 without any discussion.
09:19 Which decision would that be?
09:21 What would you decide?
09:23 - On AI,
09:24 I'm trying to bring together scientists
09:30 and thoughtful people
09:36 who are trying to find a way out.
09:39 The scientists have no evil intentions.
09:47 Their intentions are good,
09:51 but they're developing what they see.
09:57 But we have to find a means of unite that
10:04 freedom and
10:08 coexistence in the world.
10:12 - Will, in the long run,
10:14 the machines serve human beings,
10:18 or will human beings serve the machines?
10:21 - That's the question of our lifetime.
10:24 I think it can be avoided,
10:26 but only by understanding the essence of this intelligence.
10:34 Which will also be able to generate its own point of view.
10:39 It's the big challenge of our future,
10:43 and it's on that level,
10:45 it's in the interest of China
10:51 and other advanced countries,
10:55 and eventually all countries to join it.
11:01 Because otherwise they're in the hands
11:06 of machinery that they don't understand.
11:13 I'm very concerned with AI.
11:15 You ask a question,
11:17 and you get an answer.
11:21 And you believe in this answer,
11:25 even though you have no idea
11:29 what the process is by which the answer is produced.
11:34 And how the computer acquires its own knowledge.
11:42 Once these machines can communicate with each other,
11:49 which will certainly happen within five years,
11:57 then it becomes almost a species problem
12:02 of whether the human species can retain its individuality
12:09 in the face of this competition
12:15 that it itself has created.
12:18 This is the profound problem
12:26 we are now dealing with a genuinely different intelligence.
12:31 - Henry, very last question.
12:36 In 50 years, how should people speak of you in one sentence?
12:41 - I first want to say, I don't worry too much about that.
12:53 But I'd like to think of me as having been born
12:58 in a free society and wanted to bring,
13:13 to contribute to world order,
13:21 so that freedom isn't constrained by constant crisis.
13:26 That's why I've devoted myself
13:38 in various wars around the world,
13:42 to bringing them to a constructive end.
13:48 And wherever possible, a democratic solution.
13:52 (silence)
13:54 [BLANK_AUDIO]