• 4 months ago
During a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing last week, Rep. Nathaniel Moran (R-TX) questioned witnesses about preventing hostages from being taken and policies to help get them back.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you to each of the witnesses here today for this important discussion.
00:04My heart simply goes out to all those men and women abroad that are being detained inappropriately and to their families.
00:11I know it's a great burden on each one of those families when when this happens.
00:17Ambassador Carstens, I want to start with you and ask you a couple of questions in particular about some adversarial countries like Iran and Venezuela.
00:26Tell us what we are doing specifically to take away the incentives for hostages to be taken in the future.
00:35Congressman, I appreciate that question. We think deterrence is very important.
00:39We've got to come up with a way that raises the cost for these countries taking our citizens.
00:44I think it's going to take some time to build it, but I think we're already on that glide path that
00:48one day will get us to the point where we raise the cost so high that they'll stop taking our citizens.
00:53Right now, we're working with our partners and allies, most specifically the Canadians,
00:58who through their arbitrary detention initiative have brought countries to the fore,
01:03signing the Declaration Against Arbitrary Detention State-to-State Relations,
01:07currently signed by 76 countries in the European Union, trying to re-establish that norm
01:12that taking citizens and using them as political bargaining chips is just not something we should be doing.
01:18We've also established, along with the Canadians, an independent legal panel made
01:22up of high-level jurists who can start looking at some of the legal remedies that we might have
01:26to also put this problem to rest.
01:29And let me ask you about one of those.
01:30One step that might be taken is creating an official designation for maybe what's called,
01:35quote, state sponsor of arbitrary detention.
01:37Is that something you guys have discussed within the agency?
01:42I think it's being discussed right now by the independent legal panel.
01:45These are things that we've also talked about with lawyers, not only within the State Department,
01:51but the interagency.
01:52We've also reached out to places like the Atlantic Council and CSIS to have these legal
01:57discussions because right now, there are legal tools available and agreements available that
02:02we've not put into the service of stopping this problem.
02:05And they're probably ones that we're going to have to tie into.
02:08And we may actually be coming back to Congress over the next year or two to ask for more
02:12authorities that allow us to have more of a more muscular legal response to this being done.
02:17You talked about the Levinson Act earlier.
02:19That's one of the tools.
02:21Are you using sanctions that are allowed under the Levinson Act to help deter and get back
02:26our hostages?
02:28We've done so 15 times.
02:30I think you've probably noticed that we've leveled sanctions against groups in Iran.
02:34We've leveled sanctions against groups in Russia.
02:37We've leveled sanctions against specific individuals in JNIM.
02:41And the idea is that if we can level a sanction to get some sort of justice and accountability
02:46or effect a return, that's a good move.
02:49I have to confess, sometimes it's hard to level a sanction when you're currently in
02:52the negotiating space and you're trying to figure out if a sanction is leveled, what
02:56kind of pressure will that bring to bear?
02:57Will that get someone back or will that push that farther away?
03:01But to date, we've definitely used that sanctioning authority given to us by Congress.
03:05Have you also considered the possibility of amending the Foreign Sovereign Immunities
03:09Act to allow for private suits against countries that have a state sponsor of arbitrary detention
03:15designation?
03:16Have you guys considered that?
03:17Congressman, we've been talking about that for three years and that's absolutely something
03:20that we wrestle with.
03:21So, yes.
03:22What's your opinion about that?
03:23Do you think that's a good idea?
03:25I almost feel like I'm worried if I should say that we wait until we get an official
03:29decision on that before I render it.
03:31But to my mind, I would lean towards it.
03:33I mean, if a country is allowing its, if the country is behaving to the point that it's
03:37taking citizens as bargaining chips, that's something that has to be addressed.
03:41But it's, I imagine that the greater legal minds, I didn't go to law school, wasn't smart
03:46enough to get in.
03:47But I imagine that the lawyers that we've employed in trying to research this will come
03:51up with an answer that makes sense and we'll try to progress forward.
03:54I wasn't smart enough either, but somehow I did get into law school.
03:58I'm curious also about one other possible tool in your toolbox because that's really
04:02I think what we're talking about is giving you tools in the toolbox to get our hostages
04:06back.
04:06What about amending Title 18, making wrongful detention a crime and allowing suits against
04:12foreigners in those instances?
04:14I feel like you've been talking to my team because that's something that we've also been
04:17talking about.
04:18And I tell you, as we go forward, I don't think we've been shy about reaching out to
04:20Capitol Hill.
04:21We're happy to work with members of your staff and others to see if we can develop and create
04:25some more positive ways to use legal tools in the service of trying to stop this thing.
04:32But let me throw one thing at you real quick.
04:34To our mind, there is the sanctioning authority, but we feel like there are tools out there
04:38across all elements of national power that we could take and put into service of trying
04:43to stop this.
04:44Or maybe we need to come back to Congress and ask for authorities.
04:47But it can't just be diplomas.
04:48We have to think in terms of intelligence, the military, law enforcement, economic tools,
04:54all elements of national power could probably put in some sense into the service of trying
04:58to make this go away.
04:59And we look forward to working with you and your team as we go forward and explore those.
05:03I agree with those comments.
05:04And I think what you'll find on this panel today is this is a very bipartisan issue and
05:08one that we can work together.
05:09If there are legislative suggestions, I would ask you to bring those to us specifically
05:13so that we can work through the legislative process and give you some more tools in the
05:17toolbox so that we can protect our citizens when they are abroad.
05:20Thank you all for your work.
05:21Thank you, sir.
05:21Appreciate it.
05:22I yield back.
05:23Thank you, Mr. Moran.
05:24Chair now recognizes Ms. Titus for five minutes.
05:28Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
05:29You heard earlier

Recommended