During a House Financial Services Committee hearing last week, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-OH) spoke about the need to remove FDIC Director Martin Gruenberg.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Gentleman yields back. Gentleman from Ohio, Mr. Davidson, Chair of our Housing
00:04and Insurance Subcommittee, is recognized for five minutes. Thank you,
00:07Chairman. Thank you for our witnesses. Mr. McKernan, I thank you for the work to
00:12highlight some of these issues. In your opinion, can an effective top-to-bottom
00:19cultural change be made at FDIC while Martin Gruenberg is chairman? I don't
00:24think we can have real culture change until we have that fresh start. That's
00:28been my experience, whether it was in the military or in business, frankly here,
00:32you can update the HR manual, you can write new standard operating procedures,
00:37you can train them all you want. Sometimes you just got to change the
00:40people. And it seems clear that we need to do that. Why is the delay? Director
00:47Hsu, why the delay? Why should we tolerate Gruenberg sticking around
00:53through the rest of the afternoon? So, at the board, we're not delaying. We are,
00:57we've taken steps already to hire a third, independent third-party expert, an
01:02independent monitor, and to restructure the reporting lines for incidents. So
01:06those are all actions that are required to reduce the fear of retaliation, to
01:10ensure that we've got the right outside expertise so we can make the changes
01:13that are necessary. So you're outsourcing the leadership challenge to some third
01:17party, and then you're gonna put a director in to implement what the third
01:21party came up with? The purpose of engaging with the outside parties is to
01:25make sure that we got the best expertise from out—we have to do this
01:28differently. Why not just hire a good leader? We have to do this differently
01:32than the past. We want to make sure that we've got the right plan, that we're
01:35implementing those steps. It sounds to me like the plan is
01:39that we're gonna come up with a committee that's designed to delay
01:42action while Gruenberg rides out the rest of the Biden administration and
01:48continues his time there. Mr. McCarnett, how long has Director Gruenberg been at
01:54the FDIC? 20 years as I understand. 20 years. How long has he been leading it?
01:5910 of the last 13. 10 of the last 13 years he's been leading it. You think
02:03he's had anything to do with poisoning this culture? I think the chairman's
02:08ultimately accountable for the culture. Generally that's the the answer. The
02:12leader, everything that happens or fails to happen in an organization, is
02:15ultimately the top leader's responsibility. That doesn't mean he's
02:19the one that did everything, but ultimately that's the duty of
02:22leadership. And anyone can find an excuse. It seems like Gruenberg's full of them.
02:26Leaders find a way. Director Suh, do you think Gruenberg's gonna find a way?
02:30Again, I'm focused on what I can control. So if you give him a good outside
02:35third-party outsourced solution, you think he could follow it with any
02:39credibility? The purpose of having the outside expertise is to make sure that
02:43the agency is doing the best it can for the employees of the agency. What's the
02:46due date for that? Around January 21st, 2025? No, it's right now. We have to do
02:52these things right now. I know we do, but you're outsourcing it to some third
02:55party. Are they supposed to get back to you around January 21st? No, the hiring of
02:59the third party, both the expert and the monitor, is currently in process right
03:03now. And we are also going to restructure the broken internal process that has led
03:08to retaliation. Well, it might take till January 21st to get rid of Director
03:12Gruenberg, but I'm pretty sure it'll be done right around that time frame, if not
03:17before. So, Mr. McKernan, is there anything that we could do between now and January
03:2421st to facilitate Director Gruenberg's departure at the FDIC? I don't know that
03:31I can speak to that, but I think that it's important that Congress continue to
03:35exercise its oversight role to hold us accountable, including the board, for
03:39making real actionable steps to get culture change moving. Well, obviously the
03:43President of the United States could fire him. That'd be great. No leadership coming
03:46from there. But Congress has the power of the purse. I mean, we're only funded till
03:53September 30th. In theory, we could eliminate funding for Director Gruenberg's
03:57position beginning October 1st of this year. We have an opportunity coming up in
04:02the appropriations process. We have a Holman rule that would facilitate just
04:06such an action directed at Gruenberg. Does anyone believe that would be
04:11appropriate to provide congressional accountability for Director Gruenberg?
04:19Think we should keep him in place, or do you think we should continue to pay
04:23Director Gruenberg? We're the ones that provide the funding for his paycheck.
04:26Should we keep him on the United States payroll? I mean, I was really encouraged
04:31to hear Mr. Varga talk about not defending the indefensible, but if we
04:37fund his paycheck into the next fiscal year, well, we're defending the
04:42indefensible. We shouldn't provide a dime to Director Gruenberg. So I hope my
04:46colleagues will defund his payroll, and I hope it's a moot point because Joe
04:51Biden could fire him this afternoon, and that'd be the appropriate action. Anywhere
04:55else, anyone doing these kinds of things would be walked out with a cardboard box
04:59that afternoon. And I hope that becomes norm within the FDIC to not tolerate
05:05these kinds of things, whether it's of the employees or the subordinate leaders
05:09that make up the chain of command. We need to fix this culture, and Congress
05:13can do that by holding Gruenberg accountable with appropriations. I yield
05:17back.