Kashif Abbasi ka Tariq Fazal Chaudhry say Sawal,Jawab Sun kar Zartaj Gul bhi Hans Parin
#reservedseatscase #kashifabbasi #TariqFazalChaudhry #zartajgull #pti #ImranKhan #pmlngovt #offtherecord
Kashif Abbasi ka Tariq Fazal Chaudhry say Sawal,Jawab Sun kar Zartaj Gul bhi Hans Parin
Kashif Abbasi ka Tariq Fazal Chaudhry say Sawal,Jawab Sun kar Zartaj Gul bhi Hans Parin
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Doctor, the special sessions that are going to be held to get justice for Tariq Tariq,
00:04today you have brought it into law that if a party is with another party,
00:08then if it goes to another party, then it cannot get a seat.
00:15What are you doing? Why don't you want to give them seats?
00:17Now, you have lost the legal battle, you didn't like the decision,
00:21but there is some morality in it. Let them have those seats.
00:24Of course, there is.
00:28One thing, just by saying a sentence, the report that Patan has given,
00:32that I have fought 4-5 elections for the National Assembly,
00:35the fact that the turnover was less here and more there,
00:39on this basis, the decision of the judiciary is never made.
00:42The rest of the questions, if there are any,
00:44If there is a 102% turnout, then it happens.
00:47No, the 102% turnout is not justified, but the 102% turnover,
00:52what is the reason for it, what are the facts behind it,
00:54all the documents, all the records have come to the Election Commission,
00:57it all comes to the forefront, it will come.
00:59The poor thing, the ROA of this year was sick,
01:03the new ROA has come, if you ask the old one,
01:05maybe he will tell you what happened.
01:06No, no, it's here, the old one is here, the new one is here,
01:08I don't know, I don't know if the new one has come or the old one has come,
01:11but whoever is here, the Election Commission is here, the record is here,
01:14it will all come to the forefront.
01:16The record has come to the forefront, the real problem is the record,
01:19people don't come to the forefront.
01:20No, no, people have also come.
01:21You change the law and say that the tribunal judge will not sit,
01:24the ex-judge will sit, let him run, let the milk and water flow.
01:29Brother, do you know that this clause that the judge will be a Hazard Service,
01:33he will retire, this was already present in the Election Act 2017.
01:37You put it in.
01:38I didn't put it in yet.
01:40You put it in before the last election of 2024.
01:43I put it out first.
01:44You put it out that there will be no retired judges,
01:46only Hazard Service judges will be there.
01:47Now you are saying that there will be no retired judges.
01:48This was already present in the Election Act 2017 for 3, 4 or 5 years.
01:52Why?
01:53It was present in the Election Act 2017.
01:54Why did you put it out?
01:55Because you saw that a retired judge does not make a decision,
01:57he has been sitting for 5 years,
01:59you said that there will be no retired judges, only sitting judges will be there.
02:01I am telling you that either we said it or someone else said it.
02:04But you didn't realize that there are 80,000 of them.
02:06You are not understanding what I am saying.
02:08I understand sir, you are not understanding what I am saying.
02:10You are just talking nonsense.
02:12No, I am just saying that we have restored it in its original state.
02:14We have not opened a new pot there.
02:16Now it is fine.
02:18We have restored the Act in its original state.
02:20This is one thing.
02:22The second thing is what you just said.
02:24So, you put on his clothes first and then you took off his clothes.
02:26No problem, let's go ahead.
02:28There is morality, there is morality,
02:30it should be there in politics,
02:32we are completely convinced of it.
02:34But,
02:36there are some laws of the Election Act,
02:38there are some laws of that too, right?
02:40Will you leave those and only make decisions on morality?
02:42Combine both and do it.
02:44Now, this article of yours,
02:46about the National Assembly,
02:48Article 51 of the Constitution,
02:50and about the Subahi Assembly, Article 106,
02:52it clearly says that if Azad wins an election,
02:54he will join the party in three days.
02:56Now, tell me, how can he do it in 15 days?
02:58And then,
03:00after joining the party,
03:02let me tell you one thing,
03:04no one sits in my mind
03:06because I don't know what will happen
03:08in the name of complete justice.
03:10Today, someone is happy,
03:12tomorrow someone else will be upset,
03:14I am saying this from my point of view.
03:16I agree with you.
03:18But,
03:20see, whether I like it or not,
03:22you criticize,
03:24I also think that in this decision,
03:26I have understood some minority decisions more.
03:28But,
03:30in the decision of the Chief Justice of Pakistan,
03:32it is also said that
03:34the Election Commission of Pakistan
03:36misinterpreted the Supreme Court's decision,
03:38misinterpreted it,
03:40a symbol was taken from the political party,
03:42but the political party was not terminated.
03:44Because it was not a political party,
03:46and the proceedings that are going on,
03:48the case that is going on,
03:50it is a continuation of the election process,
03:52that is why we can go that far.
03:54They have also given evidence,
03:56by the decision of Justice Mandokhil,
03:58Justice Qazi Faiz has agreed,
04:00they have also given evidence that
04:02we can see it completely.
04:04I think it would have been much better
04:06if the two articles that I have put in front of you,
04:08if you had asked the Parliament
04:10to make an amendment to it.
04:12It was possible,
04:14it could have been taken out.
04:16In that case, Mr. Tehreekian would have also been with us,
04:18together with the two-thirds majority,
04:20we could have made an amendment.
04:22Because without him,
04:24there could have been no amendment.
04:26Let alone any respect for the law,
04:28the Supreme Court can clarify
04:30their articles,
04:32but it cannot rewrite them.
04:34This is our position.
04:36Let's move ahead.
04:38You say that we will make amendments,
04:40tomorrow you will close the Supreme Court.
04:42No, no, we are not closing the Supreme Court.
04:44We have respected the decisions of the Supreme Court,
04:46we have accepted them,
04:48but we just say that
04:50whatever is written in the Constitution,
04:52it should be upheld.
04:54We are not saying that those seats are ours.
04:56But we are saying that if we are giving them,
04:58then under which law?
05:00We can ask the Parliament to make an amendment.
05:02But you cannot violate the Constitution.
05:04The Election Commission has done wrong.
05:06Look, the Election Commission,
05:08Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf,
05:10as a Jamaat,
05:12I am the President of my Jamaat,
05:14every year,
05:16we keep our accounts,
05:18if they are not kept,
05:20our registration is cancelled.
05:22Today, after five years,
05:24there is an election in our party,
05:26if it is not held,
05:28our registration is cancelled.
05:30This election cannot be held.
05:32Registration cancelling means that
05:34as a political party,
05:36you are not registered in the Election Commission.
05:38And the symbol is given to the one
05:40who is registered as a political party.
05:42This is why the Tehreek-e-Insaf
05:44did not get the symbol.
05:46Whether it was right or wrong,
05:48politically, that is a different interpretation.
05:50But technically,
05:52this is the reality.
05:54Sir, but they know that they have lost.
05:56No, we have not held them.
05:58I am telling you that our seats are not there.
06:00They will not let us take our seats.
06:02The thing is,
06:04we are not taking our seats,
06:06neither do we want them,
06:08nor do we say that they are our seats.
06:10But they have to give them,
06:12or they have to keep them vacant,
06:14these are the two options.
06:16If they have to give them,
06:18then they have to do it according to the law.
06:20Now the Supreme Court has said that
06:22the law has to decide whether you like it or not.
06:24You are equipping the Speaker,
06:26who has a sword in his hand,
06:28to clarify this decision.
06:30They have notified 49,
06:32and asked for a clarification of 41.
06:34They have asked for 41,
06:36but they have not clarified it.
06:38But the reason for that is,
06:40they say, what is the party structure?
06:42But when you write a letter,
06:44you write a letter to Barrister Gaur.