FIR Mein Darj Hai Ke Sher Afzal Aur Barrister Gohar Ne Police Walon Ki. .., Walid Iqbal
FIR Mein Darj Hai Ke Sher Afzal Aur Barrister Gohar Ne Police Walon Ki. .., Walid Iqbal
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Mr. Waleed Iqbal, this is basically anything.
00:02Of course, holding a Jalsa and holding a political meeting is the right of any Jamaat.
00:07But for a long time, it was interpreted as,
00:09that it will not be possible to ask for forgiveness until the 9th May incident.
00:13But despite that, you held the Jalsa.
00:15You said that there were numbers as well.
00:17But the speech that was given by Ali Ameen Gandapur,
00:21and especially when he is the minister of a province,
00:23the language that he used with the journalists,
00:25the language that he used with the women,
00:27and the words that he used with regards to the army,
00:31it cannot be differentiated that the political speeches are different,
00:34the public speeches are different.
00:36If the public gets agitated, then who will control them?
00:40Bani is present in your jail.
00:43So, who was the beneficiary in your view of this speech,
00:47if we talk about Ali Ameen Gandapur's speech?
00:50Who benefited from it?
00:53I am surprised that the focus or the focus of attention is on the speech.
01:01Why don't you kindly read the FIRs, Mr. Sati?
01:07The FIRs or the FIRs,
01:09on the basis of which, by speaking up in the Parliament,
01:12today morning or last night,
01:14which were arrested,
01:17Barrister Gauhar,
01:19Shehrafzal...
01:20Mr. Minister, I will come to that.
01:22Alhamdulillah, Mr. Barrister has been released.
01:26That is why I am saying,
01:29my question is, what is written in those FIRs,
01:32that by taking the name of Shehrafzal Marwat,
01:34or by taking the name of Barrister Gauhar,
01:37that he placed a pistol on the policeman's shoulder.
01:41This has happened.
01:44Your crew had gone there.
01:46This has happened.
01:47In any case, this is the level in the FIRs.
01:50So, in a country,
01:52in a civilized country,
01:54in a country where there is such an adherence to morals,
01:57as you said,
01:59when all these things are happening,
02:01and you read the newspapers of the last 2, 4, 5, 6 days,
02:06what people are saying.
02:08Shafqat Mahmood and Shahid Qardar had written an article two days ago,
02:12in the newspaper.
02:14They are not political people.
02:15Shafqat Mahmood has said that he has left politics.
02:17Mr. Qardar is the Governor of the State Bank.
02:19He has written that the government which has no legitimacy,
02:23which has no concept of being elected,
02:28which has been imposed,
02:30what can you expect from it,
02:32when people are saying such things.
02:34They are saying that this is happening here,
02:36look at the root cause.
02:38Look at the root cause,
02:40what is this,
02:42why did the police come to the Parliament,
02:44and they came and…
02:46Ok, my question,
02:48my simple question,
02:50I was ready to talk about it further.
02:52Where is the word root cause being used?
02:54I am ready to go further.
02:56The word root cause is being used,
02:58that look at Balochistan,
03:00what is the root cause there?
03:02Why are there protests there?
03:04Why is BYC putting up such big protests there?
03:06Why is there so much killing going on there?
03:08If you want to look at the root cause,
03:10then look at the root cause.
03:12Mr. Sanyal,
03:14I asked you a simple question,
03:16and basically it was that,
03:18let me be very blunt about it,
03:20this speech of his,
03:22first of all,
03:24I asked you the beneficiary of it,
03:26who was it?
03:28Secondly,
03:30did it benefit the party?
03:32Or did it fulfil the purpose of his speech?
03:34Did it achieve its purpose?
03:36What purpose are you talking about?
03:40I am asking you,
03:42there must be some purpose of his speech.
03:44It is a simple question,
03:46there must be some purpose of his speech,
03:48he mentioned the army,
03:50he criticised the people,
03:52he talked about the establishment,
03:54he talked about ten things,
03:56there must be some purpose.
03:58Obviously, the benefit or benefit of the party
04:00is what a person thinks,
04:02if someone is giving a speech,
04:04then what happened?
04:06No, no one can give a lecture
04:08on benefit and loss to the PTI right now.
04:10For the PTI,
04:12what has been happening for the last two years,
04:14one and a half years,
04:16is in front of everyone.
04:18So, there is no issue of benefit or loss here.
04:20Here, the thing is,
04:22which we need to think about,
04:24the question that arises is,
04:26in this country,
04:28what is the supremacy of the constitution,
04:30or rule of law,
04:32the rule of law,
04:34is it there or not?
04:36The position of the PTI is that,
04:38it is not here,
04:40it is the law of the jungle.
04:42And the law of the jungle means that,
04:44might is right,
04:46it is a primitive,
04:48it is an ancient way of thinking,
04:50the one who has a gun,
04:52the one who has a stick,
04:54the one who has a stick,
04:56the one who has a stick,
04:58the one who has a stick,
05:00the one who has a stick,
05:02the one who has a stick,
05:04the one who has a stick.