Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00The issue of special sessions is under discussion, no solution has been reached yet.
00:06We saw that yesterday a meeting was held in the Election Commission.
00:12And today, after seven sessions, an announcement has come from the Election Commission.
00:20A total of 25 pages have been filed in the CMA, in front of the Supreme Court.
00:27They have again asked for clarification on their concerns.
00:32Keeping the opinion of the legal experts in front of them, they have been accused by the Supreme Court.
00:41The main points that we have understood from the CMA, they keep in front of you.
00:47Then we will talk about it.
00:49Mr. Abbas Zubairi is with us, a former lawyer of the Supreme Court.
00:53You know that he was also the President of the Supreme Court.
00:55We will know from him that how this matter will be settled.
00:58Viewers, Paragraph number 1 tells us that the Civil Resilience application has been filed in the CMA.
01:05In front of the Supreme Court by the Election Commission.
01:07At the time when the Election Commission filed a different request for clarification.
01:11At that time, the aforementioned amendment was not approved.
01:15However, on 14 September 2024, at the time of the court decision, the second amendment to the election was implemented.
01:23Which is present in the field as a law of land.
01:27And has a past impact.
01:31Therefore, the judgment of the court on 12 July 2024 is on the basis of the previous law.
01:37Which was present before the amendment, but has now changed.
01:41This is a strange situation in which the election commission is in a bad condition.
01:47If it fulfills its responsibilities according to the order of 14 September, then it will invalidate the law made by the parliament.
01:55In contrast, this will be the case.
01:59Paragraph number 4 says that on 19 September by the Speaker National Assembly, the second amendment to the election was submitted.
02:09The judgment of the court on 12 July was on the basis of the previous law.
02:13Which has now changed.
02:16Therefore, this act has now been invalidated by the parliament.
02:20And it is the requirement of the parliamentary principles that the election commission act on the existing law.
02:27The Speaker of the Punjab Assembly and the Speaker of the Sindh Assembly have also supported this position.
02:32And have demanded that the election commission act on the second amendment to the election act.
02:37However, Speaker KP has given his opinion contrary to this.
02:41Viewers, you know that the decision is made on 12 July.
02:44After that, on 25 July, the election commission makes a partial implementation of that decision.
02:52It sends a notification to 39 people.
03:00It implements on 24th.
03:02The CMA asks for clarification from the majority bank.
03:08You tell us that the infrastructure of a party is not present.
03:13Its intraparty elections have not been held yet.
03:15So what should we do?
03:17Its clarification comes on 14 September.
03:21Meanwhile, on 7 August, the election act was amended by the parliament in 2017.
03:29And now the election commission of Pakistan says that since a law has been made by the parliament.
03:35And in this CMA, they are saying that we have also quoted different precedents.
03:40According to the law of land, the supremacy of the parliament is determined.
03:45And the parliament can legislate.
03:49The parliament has the power to terminate the decision of any Supreme Court.
04:01Despite this, the election commission says that as a law, we are again in the service of the Supreme Court of Pakistan.
04:11And we will be told that this is the final paragraph.
04:14Viewers read and tell you.
04:17The prayer that has been done.
04:41Detail judgment majority dated 23 September.
04:44This is the latest detail judgment.
04:47Keeping all this in front, we have to get us out of this mess.
04:53Mr. Zubair is present with us.
04:55Mr. Zubair, thank you very much.
04:57You are looking at this matter from day one.
05:00Now, of course, this is such a legal and legal matter.
05:03We have to take advice from people like you.
05:06I hope by now you have collected the CMA election commission.
05:11If you have passed it, then tell me.
05:16Because they have quoted about nine different precedents.
05:20They have presented a case law.
05:22From which they prove that the parliament has this power.
05:28Legislature can do this work.
05:31If there is a decision of the Supreme Court, then its effect has to be nullified or its effect has to be increased.
05:37Whatever you want to do.
05:38So now tell me.
05:40He went back to the Supreme Court.
05:42One thing that comes to the common understanding is that he has gone back to the Supreme Court.
05:46With an opinion, the Supreme Court should know and this decision should be known.
05:51Now what will happen in your view?
05:53In the name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate.
05:55Thank you very much, Mr. Gumban.
05:57Look, they don't want to act on this.
06:00Look, the decision of July 12th was very clear.
06:03It was written in it that these 39 seats are PTI's and 11 judges held them.
06:09And for the rest, you take the affidavit within 15 days.
06:12And after that, if they tell you that they are PTI's, then you will issue this notification in their favor.
06:20So there was no fraud in this, nor was there any fraud in this.
06:24But if you still want clarification, then you will send us to the Chamber.
06:28It will be seen in the Chamber.
06:29We will give you clarification on it.
06:31And to delay this, they did this again.
06:33Look, I will tell you that a review has also been launched on the 30th.
06:38And in it, if the right is given to vote for a corrupt person, then all these things that have been done.
06:45Officer, we will do a little side step.
06:47But the question here is that the argument of the Election Commission is that if the decision comes on July 12th.
06:53Why didn't they implement it?
06:56No, sir, they are saying that we did a lot of thought on it.
07:01And on the 24th, we did partial implementation.
07:04And because they are saying that in the opinion of the Election Commission, since the infrastructure of an intra-party election is not there, then what should we do?
07:13They put a letter to the CMA for clarification on the 25th.
07:20Now the question is that from 25th July onwards, 7th, 8th, and 10th, an amendment is made.
07:28But the clarification comes very late.
07:31It comes on 14th September.
07:33So why so delay on the part of the majority bench?
07:37At that time, clarification should have been given to them immediately when this letter was written by the Election Commission.
07:43I don't know.
07:44Only those can tell who had to give clarification to the judge.
07:48But one thing is clear.
07:50It was not written anywhere in that order on July 12th that until there is no clarification, you will not implement this order.
07:56See, you have to implement the order of the Supreme Court under Article 190.
08:03This means that until there is no clarification, it is a stay.
08:07No, they didn't have to do it.
08:08You would have done it.
08:09If clarification had come, it would have come against it.
08:11You would have denotified it.
08:12See, there is nothing in this.
08:13This order has to be implemented on July 12th.
08:15The order is for July 12th.
08:17The clarification can clarify that order.
08:19It cannot overwrite it.
08:21It cannot overrule it.
08:22It can be done in the review.
08:24If it is done, it can be done in it.