• 2 days ago

Visit our website:
http://www.france24.com

Like us on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/FRANCE24.English

Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/France24_en
Transcript
00:00Staying with climate, the COP29 summit is being held in Baku, Azerbaijan this week
00:06and this year's event has been dubbed the finance cop. Negotiators must
00:11increase a 100 billion dollar a year target to help developing nations
00:16prepare for the worsening impacts of climate change and wean their economies
00:20off fossil fuels. How much is to be on offer and who will pay for it are the
00:25two major points of contention. To talk to us about that, Valérie de Camp, our
00:30environment editor, with me now. Valérie, first of all we have this existing target
00:34then of a hundred billion US dollars annually, I just mentioned that. If
00:38negotiations are successful the new goal could reach one trillion dollars. Why are
00:43we seeing such a big jump? Well the 100 billion target a year was never
00:49adequate in the first place. It was a promise made in 2009 but there was never
00:54any economic reasoning behind it. It was just an arbitrary number. Since then
00:59economists have worked to assess what it would cost to face the climate crisis
01:03and they came up with a number. 2.4 trillion US dollars every single year
01:08would be needed for developing countries, excluding China, to cut their greenhouse
01:13gas emissions and also adapt to the consequences of global warming. They say
01:18that of that sum about half could come from countries own domestic budgets and
01:24also domestic investments and that would leave roughly one trillion US
01:29dollars coming from developed nations. The UN climate chief though is insisting
01:34this isn't charity, this money. Why is the new goal so important? It's obviously a
01:40climate justice question. Developing nations did not cause the climate crisis
01:45in the first place. Wealthy nations did and so you can understand why developing
01:49nations today are saying hang on you know you've become rich with your
01:53fossil-fuel powered economies. You're asking us to stop using what made you
01:58rich but not helping in the process. So in order to address the climate crisis
02:03you need everyone on board and so you need to provide that financial aid. And
02:07just to give you an example, developing nations, developed countries, they
02:12have access to capital markets. Developing nations it's a lot more
02:16expensive and so an example of that is that Africa has about 60% of the best
02:22solar resources in the world and yet you have you know some European countries
02:27Belgium, the Netherlands, Poland not necessarily known for their sunshine.
02:31They have installed more solar panels than the whole of Sub-Saharan Africa in
02:372023. Why? Because it costs a lot more money to actually install solar panels
02:43in Africa because the cost of capital is higher. And Valerie look this trillion
02:48dollar figure, can it actually be delivered? Where's the money from that
02:52likely to come from? Well it sounds huge a trillion dollar but it's actually 1%
02:57of global GDP. It's also a year of pure profit for the fossil-fuel industry for
03:03the last 50 years on average. They've made a trillion dollars every single
03:08year and so the money does exist. It's a question of it's a political question so
03:13no developed country as we stand is ready to commit to a specific figure as
03:18long as we don't expand the donor base of who actually contributes. Other
03:24countries they're also quite wealthy and polluting so for example you know the
03:29group of countries obliged to actually provide climate finance that list was
03:35prepared in 1992. The world economy has changed massively since then. You have
03:41emerging economies like China, South Korea a lot richer than they used to be.
03:45They pollute a lot more. They're still considered developing petro-states.
03:49Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar also considered developing nations although
03:54they have amassed vast oil wealth. So it's another kind of climate justice
04:01question. Should only historical high emitters contribute or should we open up
04:05the donor base? China has been very clear that they don't want to give up on
04:09their developing status. Just a final question then if countries aren't going
04:13to pay who will? Economists say that much of the funding will not actually come
04:19from taxpayers money in the West. It's actually multilateral development banks
04:25like the World Bank, the IMF. We are looking at about 200 to 400 billion a
04:30year in the form of low interest loans but that will require sweeping reform so
04:37it will take time. And there's the other idea of global taxes, solidarity taxes
04:43being increasingly discussed. So for example a 2% wealth tax on billionaires.
04:49This is a Brazilian proposal. They have shown that just with a hundred
04:53billionaire families in Brazil alone you could potentially raise more than 250
04:58billion dollars every single year. And then you obviously have taxes on
05:03polluting industries, shipping, aviation, financial transactions and that could
05:08generate about 900 billion by 2030. But it will again require a specific global
05:16agreement. The most likely scenario at COP is that we will reach an estimate or
05:21around you know a couple of billions of public funding, the rest having to come
05:26from private investments. But if you think about the fact that developed
05:32countries were never able to achieve their promise of providing a hundred
05:36billion only by 2020, you know you can understand that it's going to be a
05:41massive challenge to get to a trillion. Indeed but very important story. Thanks
05:46for breaking that down for us Valerie de Camp, our environment editor for us there.

Recommended