“When peace has been broken anywhere, the peace of all countries everywhere is in danger.”
These were Putin’s words back in 2007 at the Conference on Security Policy in Munich…
These were Putin’s words back in 2007 at the Conference on Security Policy in Munich…
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00As Franklin Roosevelt said in the first days of the Second World War,
00:07no matter where the world is broken, the world is safe and under threat everywhere.
00:14These words continue to be relevant today.
00:17This is evidenced by the topic of our conference, which is written here –
00:23global crises, global responsibility.
00:26I am convinced that we have come to a critical moment,
00:29when we must seriously consider the whole architecture of global security.
00:35Do we have to look involuntarily at various internal conflicts in certain countries,
00:41at the actions of authoritarian regimes, tyrants,
00:45at the spread of weapons of mass destruction?
00:48Of course, this is a serious issue.
00:50Can we look involuntarily at what is happening?
00:57I will try to answer your question as well.
01:00Of course, we should not look involuntarily.
01:02Of course, we should not.
01:04But do we have the means to resist this threat?
01:08Of course, we do.
01:10It is enough to recall a recent story.
01:14After all, there was a peaceful transition to democracy in our country.
01:18After all, there was a peaceful transformation of the Soviet regime.
01:23A peaceful transformation.
01:25And what regime?
01:27With what number of weapons, including nuclear weapons?
01:31Why now, in every convenient case, do we need to bomb and shoot?
01:37Is it really that in the absence of the threat of mutual destruction,
01:41we lack political culture, respect for the values of democracy and the rule of law?
01:46The potential danger of destabilizing international relations
01:49is associated with an obvious stagnation in the field of disarmament.
01:53Russia is in favor of resuming dialogue on this most important issue.
01:58It is important to maintain the stability of the international legal disarmament base,
02:06while ensuring the continuity of the process of reducing nuclear weapons.
02:12I cannot but mention the crisis state of the agreement on the usual armed forces in Europe.
02:18NATO countries have openly stated that they will not ratify the agreement,
02:22including the position on the flanking restrictions,
02:26on the deployment of a certain number of armed forces on the flanks,
02:30until Russia withdraws its bases from Georgia and Moldova.
02:34Our troops are withdrawing from Georgia, and even in an accelerated order.
02:38We and our Georgian colleagues have solved these problems, and everyone knows that.
02:43In Moldova, there is a group of 1,500 servicemen
02:47who perform peacekeeping functions and guard warehouses with ammunition
02:52that have remained since the USSR.
02:55But what is happening at the same time?
02:58At the same time, in Bulgaria and Romania,
03:01the so-called light American advance bases of 5,000 bayonets each are appearing.
03:11It turns out that NATO is pushing its advance forces to our state borders,
03:17and we, strictly fulfilling the agreement, do not react to these actions in any way.
03:22I think it is obvious that the process of NATO expansion has nothing to do
03:27with the modernization of the Alliance itself or with ensuring security in Europe.
03:32On the contrary, this is a seriously provoking factor that reduces the level of mutual trust.
03:38And we have a fair right to ask frankly against whom this expansion is.