👉 El juicio contra Martín del Río, acusado de asesinar a sus padres, comenzó con un jurado popular. Las pruebas presentadas desacreditan su coartada inicial y revelan su afición por las armas. El fiscal Alejandro Musso lidera la acusación en este caso que ha capturado la atención del público.
🗣️ @facupastor
👉 Seguí en #ElNoticieroDeA24
📺 a24.com/vivo
🗣️ @facupastor
👉 Seguí en #ElNoticieroDeA24
📺 a24.com/vivo
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00He was known as the Walking Murderer, this man who was rowing and as a result of his rowing he was also recognized by his lover, by his ex-wife and by some other witnesses,
00:10despite the fact that he says that he is not the man that can be seen in those images that impacted him so much.
00:17His parents were stabbed inside his house, inside the car.
00:24The car, first there was talk of a commando group that entered in a black car,
00:28then as a result of those images they showed that the quarter of his son had not been what he had said and that he had been in the house
00:36and where he is seen then leaving towards where Javier was reporting.
00:41This trial began on Monday with a popular jury of 12 people, 6 women and 6 men.
00:48All those who declared him drowned him, that is the reality.
00:52Most of them were part of his family.
00:55His brother, his ex-wife, was the testimony, I would say, more emotional and cruel also,
01:03because the woman said that she had realized that she was living with a monster that deformed her,
01:09that lied to her all her life because she had other extra-marital relations,
01:14that she had a double life anywhere and that she left her children in school practically because they cannot face the situation.
01:23Fabi, wait a minute, because what is happening inside is very interesting.
01:27We share it, we analyze it together, here with Javi, Fabián Rubino live in San Isidro.
01:32They are exposing him, he sees him there, he continues to insist on his innocence, Javier.
01:36He said that it was a commando group with a black car.
01:41There he is exposing himself, the prosecutor.
01:44There he is seen from behind, in red.
01:46Mark on the door, we saw him.
01:48The mark had.
01:49It's Martín del Río.
01:50What did he say?
01:51He came in all the hearings.
01:53Let's listen to the prosecutor.
01:55Mark where the walker entered that we saw him entering.
01:58He pushed, he had it on one side and he had it on the other.
02:01He opened and closed the door.
02:03Alejandro Muñoz is the prosecutor in charge, the group of three prosecutors.
02:06This is an accusation, it is very interesting to see what is happening.
02:10Martín del Río is a shooter.
02:12Martín del Río likes weapons.
02:15Martín del Río always had weapons, like his father.
02:19Although he didn't want to say it here.
02:21And there we have it.
02:22Martín del Río.
02:24Conditional civilian use.
02:26Weapon carrying.
02:28Do you know what weapon carrying is?
02:29Do you know what the difference is between carrying and tenancy?
02:32Tenancy can be given to anyone.
02:36Normal, who has a normal life.
02:38And it is renewed every five years.
02:40It is the most basic permission.
02:42You can have it inside your home and you can't take it out in any way.
02:46Who has carrying?
02:48Security forces, the armed forces.
02:50And the people who support their profession,
02:53for their profession,
02:54can carry a gun loaded in immediate use conditions on the street.
02:59It is renewed every year and requires a permanent psychological exam.
03:05Martín was a shooter.
03:07You can't give it to anyone.
03:09Shooting practice.
03:11You have to have it at full capacity to do it.
03:13Because if not, you would be a monkey with a razor on the street.
03:15You can't walk around with a loaded gun.
03:19Return of Martín del Río to Nordelta.
03:21This also, well, it doesn't catch my attention anymore.
03:24But this caught my attention.
03:25He comes back, they agree with Cecilia.
03:27They look for her in the forum.
03:28They eat.
03:29In Biblos.
03:30They look for a pizza.
03:31And they go together in the Mercedes Benz truck.
03:37What did this photo say yesterday?
03:39Cecilia was with me.
03:40I showed it to her.
03:41The first time I investigated it.
03:44And I showed it to her yesterday.
03:45No, it must be there, Cecilia.
03:47It's him leaving to leave the gun in San Diego.
03:48I don't have any other.
03:51Let's go to the mental format of Martín del Río and his way of proceeding.
03:56And we saw it yesterday.
03:57There is a scientific term.
03:59I told you that I am a cybercrime prosecutor.
04:01I am constantly working with data.
04:05And within what is data analysis, there is a term called Harking.
04:10Which is, with apologies from the English teacher, I will say it in English.
04:13Hypothesizing after the results are known.
04:17No. Hypothesizing after the results are known.
04:23The English teacher is laughing.
04:25Sorry.
04:28What does this mean?
04:30This is, in simple words, Dracula hanging listening and listening and listening.
04:37Capturing information.
04:39And then giving his hypothesis.
04:42Stealing data.
04:44There is retroactivity.
04:45Let's reiterate.
04:46The one you are listening to is the prosecutor of Vicente López, Alejandro Musso.
04:51Back there, Río himself is dressed, isn't he?
04:54You can see it.
04:55Chomba Roja.
04:56Chomba Roja.
04:57Absolutely looking at the accusation.
04:59Fabián Rubino is outside.
05:00Fabi, what expectations do we have of the schedule?
05:03When can we know if there is any definition?
05:08Of course there are alternatives.
05:09I calculate that today, late, mid-afternoon onwards, I calculate.
05:15But here what is going to be asked is the perpetual detention of this man.
05:20The defense of Ríos, obviously, will ask for his absolution.
05:23But then the jurors will have to define whether he is guilty or not guilty.
05:30And the judge, then, will have to define whether he is granted perpetual detention.
05:36As the prosecutor of the case is requesting at the moment.
05:41Well, let's leave a little more.
05:43When the allegations end, as Fabián said, the court will define whether the sentence is today or maybe tomorrow.
05:52No, it was also planned that it could be on Saturday.
05:58It depends on the timing of the allegations.
06:02Let's see.
06:07Here we have it.
06:08An antisocial psychopath.
06:10Martín de Libro.
06:13Lack of empathy, the other does not exist.
06:15The brother does not exist.
06:17The ex-wife does not exist.
06:19The children do not exist.
06:21The children do not exist.
06:23The only ones that do exist are the parents that do not exist.
06:27Why did he take them?
06:30If he had served them, the parents would not exist either.
06:33Transgression of the rules. He sets the rules.
06:35He does not care about social rules, he does not care about the rules of the law.
06:38He sets his rules and only fulfills his rules.
06:41And he pushes them according to his need.
06:43Lack of guilt.
06:45We saw it yesterday.
06:47From my point of view, as I have seen it five times,
06:51he pretends to cry.
06:54But that is a personal perception. You will have yours.
06:57Lack of guilt. We said it.
06:59Extreme materialism to dominate your environment.
07:01I only buy, I have. I buy, I do not sell.
07:05And with that money I manage my environment.
07:07I give you two to you to shut up.
07:09You bother me, I give you five to you.
07:11When you bother me, I give you three.
07:13I take you out.
07:15I dominate, I dominate my environment.
07:17And of course, non-existent scruples.
07:19Because we have seen it.
07:20The results of this investigation led us to the fact that
07:22when it was complicated, when they touched this,
07:25which is what bothers him the most,
07:28he took it to his parents.
07:32The phrase that characterizes him for me is this.
07:37What is good for me is good.
07:39The other does not exist.
07:41And only two final sentences and I'm going to finish my part.
07:44The first is a popular saying.
07:46The mute prosecutor begins to finish.
07:49We ask for the video killing the parents.
07:51The video killing the parents has Martín.
07:53Someday it will appear there.
07:55But with all the evidence we have,
07:57if he has four legs, barks and moves his tail,
08:00gentlemen, he is a dog.
08:02The prosecutor closes with a popular comment, a popular saying.
08:07And the last of Abraham Lincoln, the president of the United States.
08:09And he adds a historical, political quote.
08:11He can deceive some all the time.
08:13And all some time.
08:15But you can't fool everyone all the time.
08:19And today you are going to show
08:21that this phrase is relevant and it is true.
08:24Back, Martín Díaz with a plastic glass in his hand.
08:28As Javier said, with the red jacket.
08:32What you are seeing in the air is
08:34the search for the veredict in the double parricide of Vicente López.
08:38This man is accused of killing his parents.
08:40There is no doubt for the prosecutors
08:42that he committed the crime.
08:45And that he planned it and sought the moment.
08:48There it is.
09:11Thank you very much.
09:13Thank you, doctors.
09:15Thank you very much, Ms.
09:20Doctors, who is going to speak?
09:25Can we turn off the projector or are you going to need it?
09:28Oh, well.
09:41Do you need us to turn off the light too, doctor?
09:44No, no.
09:48Well, good morning everyone.
09:55Members of the jury.
09:59We all start the same, right?
10:00Saying, members of the jury, thank you, thank you for your attention.
10:03But really, I'm honestly impressed.
10:08It's my first experience in a prosecutor's trial.
10:11I imagined something else.
10:13I imagined something else because I did not imagine
10:16the attention that is perceived in you.
10:19I mean, I see you attentive.
10:21I never noticed a little distraction in you.
10:25I see you absorbing, I see you taking information.
10:27And I do want to thank you for that.
10:29But it's not a format, ladies and gentlemen.
10:31Members of the jury, thank you for your attention.
10:33This is real.
10:34Honestly, I was shocked.
10:36How I saw you attentive, that you did not lose detail,
10:39that if you had to run your head, you had to stop,
10:42you jumped alone.
10:44Well, what is being said in there is very shocking.
10:47Not always society can see,
10:50has the possibility of seeing live
10:53a procedure of these characteristics.
10:56Analyze, an oral and public trial.
10:58A trial by jury, right?
11:01The murderer, the alleged murderer, sitting there.
11:04The prosecutors working like in the movies.
11:07And let's explain the institute of the trial by jury, Ana Lía.
11:10Not always, and not in all courts, is imposed, right?
11:14Exactly.
11:15And the truth is that here it is very important to see
11:18how this mechanism begins to play,
11:20in which 12 citizens participate in the judicial decision
11:25to condemn or declare innocent, in this case, Adel Rio.
11:29And well, the decision will be read later by your lady, by the judge,
11:33but if the decision is taken by this jury.
11:36And it is also important to remember here the defense of Adel Rio,
11:42that he says it was not the one in the video, right?
11:45And they discard or forget all the other elements of evidence
11:48that are also in the case.
11:50Javier says it was not the video of the security cameras.
11:53He points out that it is the ex-partner of his lover.
11:58That's what the defense said, that it was the ex-partner of his lover
12:02and that it was his way of threatening him,
12:05because he found out that he was in this clandestine relationship,
12:08that he did not leave his wife because he was with an infirmity.
12:12And then the ex-partner of his lover chased him, threatened him.
12:18Yesterday in the hearing, the judge says that he knows
12:22that the parents were killed by a group of commanders
12:26that arrived in a black car.
12:29It's a robbery.
12:31It's a robbery.
12:33It's a robbery because they were missing.
12:37There are 10,000 dollars, 1,500,000 pesos,
12:4150 kilos of gold, 10 grams each,
12:45a house.
12:48Martín del Río's brother said,
12:51Martín del Río has to go to prison for life.
12:55He started crying at a certain moment.
12:58The ex-wife of del Río said two days ago
13:02that Martín Santiago del Río made some of the members of the popular jury cry.
13:06They cried until almost the end,
13:09because of what he said.
13:15The eldest son, Martín del Río, the alleged homicide,
13:20when they presented me to you at the hearing,
13:24I told them that I was the victim's lawyer,
13:27that together with Dr. D'Angelo we did the search,
13:30that we presented ourselves from the beginning of the investigation
13:32to know the truth.
13:34And at a certain moment, I'm sorry for what I'm going to say,
13:37but it was textual.
13:39I presented myself as Martín del Río.
13:41Let's see, let's see, let's see. He broke, didn't he?
13:44I mean, I was the victim,
13:46one of the victims,
13:48that we presented ourselves to the guarantor judge,
13:50asking him to let us see the investigation.
13:53And I did it in the representation of Martín and Diego.
13:59Obviously, they hid the investigation from me.
14:02Because those who were investigating...
14:04Complete Javi what you were going to say, it was very important.
14:07One of the children of Martín del Río,
14:10when he finds out about this,
14:14he told the court that he...
14:17I was Martín's lawyer.
14:19But I was also Enrique's lawyer.
14:21I was also Mercedes' lawyer.
14:23He was my father's son of a bitch.
14:25Many years ago.
14:27I never told my family, they were convinced.
14:29Today I tell it here in court.
14:31The first day I said, we want to see the investigation,
14:33we want to know what happened.
14:35And now I'm going to tell you a few things.
14:37But well, I go back to how I presented myself to you.
14:39I told you that I presented myself in that role,
14:41that we saw the investigation,
14:43that we began to control,
14:45and with the progress of the investigation,
14:47we began to see things.
14:51How many times did the phrase come out in this debate?
14:54With the newspaper of Monday.
14:56Well, I was the first.
14:58That newspaper of Monday, he killed me.
15:03He was Martín del Río's lawyer at first.
15:07Then we started to see how,
15:09being a lawyer of the particular victim,
15:11how at some point the particular victim
15:13was the murderer himself.
15:15The twist is incredible, isn't it?
15:19And this is interesting, Facu,
15:21because as lawyers, it can happen to us, it happens to us.
15:24You take a case,
15:26and you end up in great debt.
15:29That his client had many elements against him, right?
15:32He could be the main accused of this murder.
15:37And he was afraid that I would kill him.
15:41Well, on September 7 at night,
15:46the arrest took place.
15:48I found out on September 8 in the morning.
15:51Early in the morning.
15:54I received Diego and Cecilia.
15:58I wanted to understand.
16:00I couldn't explain anything.
16:02I charged them.
16:04We went to the prosecutor's office,
16:06and Dr. Orlandini
16:08didn't let Cecilia in.
16:10They were still investigating Cecilia.
16:14Diego and I were told
16:16why that had happened.
16:20Let's see with Gaby Prosper
16:22in the external part of the courts.
16:24What you are seeing is
16:26the oral and public trial
16:28live, with great expectation.
16:31Gabriel is already there,
16:33a large coverage,
16:35because there are many media interested
16:37in seeing what the verdict will be.
16:40Yes, of course, Facundo.
16:42This case shocked
16:44from the first moment.
16:46Let's remember,
16:48the victims of the murder,
16:50the couple who appear
16:52in the car inside the garage.
16:54Almost immediately,
16:56they are blamed for the fact,
16:58at least indirectly,
17:00to the Mucama, to Nina,
17:02as if she had been
17:04the deliverer of a robbery,
17:06because in the scene
17:08they had left a mess
17:10so that we could think,
17:12those of us who were watching
17:14the first traces of this fact,
17:16that it had been a robbery,
17:18the same as the investigators.
17:20Now, with the passing of the days,
17:22and especially when,
17:24remember Facundo,
17:26we said, this woman is very far
17:28from being able to commit
17:30such an atrocious crime
17:32as the one that is being treated here.
17:34Until the video appeared,
17:36the video that is the fundamental proof,
17:38the proof that can leave or not in jail
17:40to this man, Martín del Río,
17:42that in these moments
17:44he is spending his culminating moment,
17:46evidently of his life,
17:48guilty or innocent,
17:50it will be known in a while.
17:52For now, the allegations
17:54we are sharing in the midday of A24,
17:56in the noti of A24.
17:58But we will have to wait,
18:00the expectation is high,
18:02the afternoon will surely be long,
18:04the jury will have to deliberate first
18:06and then its verdict,
18:08guilty or innocent,
18:10the sentence will then remain
18:12to the court, how many years
18:14in case of being considered guilty,
18:16they will touch Martín del Río,
18:18or if he is innocent,
18:20if that fundamental proof
18:22that the video is or is not
18:24enough to bring
18:26to the crime scene
18:28this man, the son accused
18:30of murdering his parents, no more, no less.
18:32That is the absolute expectation, total,
18:34that there is here in front of the San Isidro Courts.
18:36Well, it's shocking what is being seen
18:38because, I repeat,
18:40we have seen oral trials,
18:42we have seen trial by jury,
18:44but this was a very resonant case.
18:46Who you are seeing there with the orange cap
18:48is Martín del Río,
18:50the accused of the double parricide
18:52of Vicente López,
18:54who now says he has nothing to do with it,
18:56that he is innocent.
18:58As Javier said, he says that his parents were killed
19:00by a command group.
19:02I go back to the allegations,
19:04I go back inside.
19:06To the brother,
19:08to the parents, to the children,
19:10to the grandparents, to the in-laws,
19:12to the lawyers.
19:14Well,
19:18we are going to start with that.
19:20They told him,
19:22with all this,
19:24tons and tons of lies,
19:26the motivation is proven.
19:28Irregular handling, no way.
19:30Because
19:32Diego del Río came and told them
19:34that since the administration of the successor
19:36they had to sell goods badly
19:38and pay a million and a half dollars
19:40to pay the debt of the pufos that Martín had left.
19:42But
19:44Martín did not contradict it.
19:46He said they had paid,
19:48he said a million and four hundred,
19:50he lowered it a little
19:52with the little pocket of my pocket.
19:54Now we are going to go into that.
19:56But not anyone owes
19:58a million and four hundred thousand dollars
20:00to people.
20:02I mean, and they are all
20:04unfulfilled contracts.
20:06Contract is an agreement of wills.
20:08They are words between two people.
20:10The legal definition,
20:12our technical definition of lawyers.
20:14What is a contract?
20:16It is an agreement of wills.
20:18Well, here were two wills.
20:20The one on the other side and that of Martín.
20:22Well,
20:24for not fulfilling that will
20:26expressed by Martín,
20:28a million and four hundred came out.
20:30If from here or from here,
20:32we'll see later.
20:34So, that irregular handling is approved.
20:36Do you think
20:38Martín del Río's deception
20:40regarding the purchase
20:42of the property of his parents was approved?
20:44And the imminent move?
20:46Yesterday's was from Antesco.
20:48They were not going to move.
20:50No, that was Pinamar.
20:52The way
20:54to put a little bit here
20:56and a little bit there
20:58was finishing.
21:00Well,
21:02I'm not going to bore you with that
21:04because, I insist, Dr. Musso
21:06your attention to detail is a super deep analysis.
21:08It is worth remembering, Javi,
21:10that this story had another meaning.
21:12Nina,
21:14the domestic employee
21:16was seven days in prison
21:18and because of Martín del Río.
21:20Why did he frame her?
21:22He pointed it out.
21:24What's more,
21:26when he is called in 911,
21:28he says,
21:30I think the domestic employee has something to do
21:32with the way he told me the story.
21:34Let's see if I can recover those images
21:36to see what she says.
21:38Let me know if we have it with sound.
21:40Of course, a woman who was
21:42seven days in prison.
21:44This is the last thing he said in the last hours.
21:46Let's listen to the woman.
21:50I'm fine,
21:52but I don't know what you're going to ask me.
21:54That's the problem.
21:56But if you ask me something I know,
21:58I will answer as it should.
22:00Do you understand me?
22:02But of course,
22:04I didn't do anything.
22:06How was that day
22:08when you found that situation in the garage?
22:10That's bad.
22:12Old memories.
22:14It hurts me a lot.
22:16It hurts you, I imagine,
22:18because in addition to having
22:20shared many years,
22:22you were out of work at that time.
22:24Yes, two years and four months ago.
22:26I'm out of work.
22:28Nina, what are your feelings
22:30about Martín del Río?
22:32I can't say anything.
22:34Did you get in touch with him again?
22:36No, never again.
22:38He remained in the representation of the family.
22:40At some point,
22:42how have you been?
22:44No, never.
22:46I never received a message from them.
22:48How? How?
22:50I don't care.
22:52Nina, dear,
22:54ask Chicha on the floor
22:56if you doubted Martín del Río at first.
22:58More or less.
23:00I don't want to say anything here,
23:02but that's how it is.
23:04It's a very difficult moment for me.
23:06Nina, Martín del Río
23:08is seen with a whip
23:10when he leaves
23:12Vicente López's house.
23:14Do you recognize that whip?
23:16Yes, of course.
23:18I worked with those people for many years.
23:20I washed the whip.
23:22Do you think this man
23:24could have done something like that?
23:26Look, I can't say
23:28that it was him.
23:30It's very ugly to accuse
23:32your neighbor without knowing the facts.
23:34I have to see
23:36to believe, to say.
23:38What movements did you see
23:40the previous week, the previous days?
23:42No, nothing.
23:44Nothing.
23:48Did José and Mercedes talk to you
23:50about a possible move?
23:52Yes.
23:54They were preparing to leave.
23:56Of course.
24:00I never knew
24:02about their lives.
24:04If you had a chance one day,
24:06what would you tell Martín?
24:08I don't know.
24:10You have to be in that moment.
24:14Do you have any plans
24:16for this week?
24:18We understand that the hearings
24:20will continue throughout the week.
24:22I don't have anything to say.
24:24Did they tell you
24:26that you were going to continue
24:28working in the other apartment?
24:30Yes, of course.
24:32How did this affect your life?
24:34My head.
24:36I was a little crazy.
24:38I was always crazy,
24:40but not so much.
24:42What does this have to contribute?
24:44How do you feel?
24:46I'm fine,
24:48but I don't know what they're going to ask me.
24:50But if they ask me something
24:52that I know, I will answer.
24:54Do you understand me?
24:56Do you have a calm conscience?
24:58Of course.
25:00I didn't do anything.
25:02How was that day
25:04when you found that situation?
25:06This poor woman,
25:08Dina, was accused
25:10unjustly
25:12of double parricide.
25:14As part of this,
25:16I return to Gaby Prosperi.
25:18Do you know
25:20how this man
25:22tried to divert the investigation?
25:24Exactly.
25:26As we said before,
25:28in the first days
25:30of the investigation,
25:32when we found out
25:34about the scene in Antesca,
25:36let's imagine
25:38a couple in that house
25:40of Melo Almincien
25:42in Vicente López,
25:44a very nice house
25:46aboard their car,
25:48in the garage, both murdered,
25:50with
25:52paper,
25:54memorabilia, furniture,
25:56that is, the scene of a supposed robbery.
25:58The first one to get there
26:00was exactly the one we just heard,
26:02Nina.
26:04And automatically
26:06the looks on her,
26:08like the deliverer
26:10of what would have been
26:12a murder on the occasion of a robbery.
26:14However,
26:16in the course of time,
26:18and I reiterate this concept,
26:20when we first heard
26:22this woman speak
26:24in front of the media,
26:26when we saw her publicly,
26:28I think we all
26:30thought that
26:32this woman,
26:34a hard-working woman,
26:36without too much
26:38talent for crime,
26:40one thought,
26:42how could this woman
26:44commit a homicide
26:46of such caliber?
26:48When she had been working
26:50with the family for a long time,
26:52as we just heard,
26:54they had offered her to continue
26:56working with them
26:58in another location.
27:00That is, she didn't give the idea
27:02that she could be
27:04the leader of a gang
27:06to rob and murder her boss.
27:08Not at all.
27:10Just as in any investigation,
27:12and you know it very well, Facundo,
27:14Javier too,
27:16the intimate circle
27:18of the first family
27:20begins to grow.
27:22And from the intimate circle
27:24came the possibility
27:26that it was one of his children,
27:28in this case, Martín del Río,
27:30who was the main suspect.
27:32And when the video appeared,
27:34there then,
27:36with the almost confirmation
27:38of the man
27:40who appears
27:42a few meters from his house,
27:44wearing a hood,
27:46without identifying himself,
27:48because he knows that the cameras
27:50can take him,
27:52well, all that led
27:54to this leading thread
27:56to what is happening
27:58within the San Isidro Courts.
28:00The key day,
28:02the day for Martín del Río.
28:04Today we will know
28:06for a few days later
28:08the sentence, if it were, I reiterate,
28:10highlighted as culpable
28:12by the jury.
28:14Wait for me, Gaby, I'll be back.
28:16Oral and public trial,
28:18jury trial.
28:20To Martín Ríos.
28:22Yes, speaking of the particular victim.
28:24Nina.
28:26Nina, with all her...
28:28her way of expressing herself,
28:30was very clear, was forceful.
28:32That day, the first thing that caught his attention
28:34was not only that they did not go down,
28:36but that
28:38the night before
28:40there was no dirty dishes,
28:42that he only cleaned glasses.
28:44And why was it
28:46what caught his attention? They did not go down, they did not go down.
28:48But before discovering
28:50what he discovered, he communicated with Blanca
28:52and told her,
28:54Blanca,
28:56she had no dishes.
28:58Then Blanca suggests
29:00to the waitress,
29:02she says that if there were no dishes,
29:04because they had not dined,
29:06maybe they would have gone.
29:08And that's where he discovers the fact.
29:10So I'm going to stay with that,
29:12that they did not dine.
29:14And if I put that together
29:16with what the Mercedes friends
29:18declared,
29:20María Carrique,
29:22no, sorry,
29:24María Ide Carrique
29:26and Cristina,
29:28Cristina Liliana Franco,
29:30that they dined at seven and a half in the afternoon,
29:32we already have a window
29:34much smaller, they did not dine.
29:38That
29:40regarding what Nina told us
29:42and what Blanca told us.
29:44Well, Facundo Especia,
29:46Ramón Roy, are the policemen who have been
29:48absolutely eloquent. Alejandro
29:50Orlandini, a crack with
29:52the theme of the streets, the walks.
29:54Well, Ezequiel
29:56Jarocchi, Ezequiel Jarocchi
29:58was an extremely eloquent guy
30:00and as Dr. Muzo just analyzed,
30:02he told us about the lock,
30:04the marble floor,
30:06the lies of the fray,
30:08the ridiculousness of the fray.
30:12But
30:14let's see, the lies had
30:16an absolute engineering job.
30:18You have to have
30:20occurrence to
30:22tell
30:24that the employees
30:26of the Thai embassy
30:28carried industrial frayers
30:32to an apartment that they lent them
30:34and poured oil on the floor
30:36so that there is no
30:40fantasy and fantasy.
30:42Who speaks is the lawyer
30:44of the victims.
30:46Felix Ninfante
30:48is the doctor,
30:50Dr. Felix Ninfante,
30:52who is one of the two lawyers
30:54and the brother
30:56of the accused
30:58is Diego del Rio,
31:00who, obviously,
31:02being particularly damaged,
31:04is obviously claiming the truth.
31:06Let's go back to Analia,
31:08which is worth explaining
31:10what is a particularly damaged person.
31:12Well, it is that person who feels,
31:14as the word indicates, damaged
31:16by the situation, by the crime.
31:18Then he has the right to appear
31:20in court as a believer
31:22Particularly damaged.
31:24But in the province of Buenos Aires
31:26the procedure is called
31:28particularly damaged.
31:30But it is who has a personal interest
31:32in that judicial process,
31:34in getting to the truth.
31:36And he can not appear
31:38and leave everything in the hands of the prosecutor.
31:40Then the prosecutor
31:42represents the action,
31:44obviously in this case criminal,
31:46in terms of the accusation.
31:48The brother
31:50did not want to appear immediately.
31:52He went to denounce and denounced the brother.
31:54In fact, in the first moments,
31:56let's remember that they appeared,
31:58as the doctor indicated,
32:00the three of them
32:02to look for a defender,
32:04Martín, Diego.
32:06Yes, because they were suspected.
32:08The first situations
32:10until they quickly separate them.
32:12And why do they quickly separate them?
32:14They accuse Martín and arrest him
32:16because they find elements, the prosecution,
32:18that involve him.
32:20And that's why he's waiting for this trial
32:22also in a prison.
32:24That's why the child,
32:26who is now praying,
32:28said in the beginning,
32:30I defended him.
32:32I was his lawyer too.
32:34He felt like defrauded
32:36and even for moments he broke.
32:38The brother of Martín del Río
32:40in his statement
32:42before the court,
32:44I'm reading it here,
32:46it was a long statement,
32:48emotional, he cried
32:50at a certain moment, Diego del Río,
32:52because, of course, his brother
32:54killed his own parents too.
32:56And he said,
32:58that's the defendant.
33:00The defendant is the murderer
33:02and I want him in prison.
33:04The defendant is the murderer
33:06and I want him in prison.
33:08And he added, and he said, among other things,
33:10if he is my brother,
33:12that person is my brother,
33:14I've known him for 50 years.
33:16He walks like this,
33:18a little crooked,
33:20and they called him
33:22Pato Criollo,
33:24because of the way he walks too.
33:26Among all the testimonies of Diego
33:28saying that he was his brother,
33:30that he recognized his clothes,
33:32Nina saying that he recognized his clothes
33:34because he worked so many years in the house
33:36and recognized even the clothes
33:38that he had, that he said it was not him,
33:40but everyone indicates that it was him.
33:42To deepen, when we come back,
33:44we are going to
33:46go back to page 0 in this story
33:48to see what was the behavior
33:50of the alleged murderer
33:52in the instant after
33:54the death,
33:56to the parricide.
33:58If this was a parricide,
34:00as justice will have to determine in minutes.