مدي 1 تي في : مقترحات مشروع تعديل مدونة الأسرة تستأثر باهتمام المغاربة - 28/12/2024
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Welcome to the new network's friends.
00:04The highlight that drew your attention to this week's social media and you interacted
00:17with it.
00:18In the virtual world, we are going to land on the ground of reality.
00:28The Moroccan social media platforms witnessed this week a wide-ranging interaction on the
00:38issue of the modification of the family register.
00:41This broad interest came after the committee of review revealed on the last Monday the
00:47most prominent amendments and details of the legitimate opinion issued by the Supreme
00:52King Mohammed VI.
00:56The amendments related to the revision of the family register specialized in an important
01:01area of marriage and included these amendments, the engagement, the marriage contract and
01:06the marriage contracts specific to the Moroccan people and the age of marriage, in addition
01:11to the multiplication.
01:22The amendments included amendments to the family register, amendments to the marriage
01:29contract, amendments to the marriage contract, amendments to the marriage contract, amendments
01:36to the marriage contract, amendments to the marriage contract, amendments to the marriage
01:43contract, amendments to the marriage contract, amendments to the marriage contract, amendments
01:49to the marriage contract, amendments to the marriage contract, amendments to the marriage
01:56contract, amendments to the marriage contract, amendments to the marriage contract, amendments
02:02to the marriage contract, amendments to the marriage contract, amendments to the marriage
02:08contract, amendments to the marriage contract, amendments to the marriage contract, amendments
02:13to the marriage contract, amendments to the marriage contract, amendments to the marriage
02:18contract, amendments to the marriage contract.
02:48Maseen wrote that staying in the mother's womb, despite her marriage, is a violation of the rights of the father to his children.
02:56As for Fuad, he wrote that marriage has become financially and morally expensive, and legal, judicial and legal costs have been added to it.
03:04Ahmed said that some of the suggestions were placed within a liberal concept,
03:08meaning that the husband should be alone at home after the death of a man whose whole family was with him.
03:15To comment, Ms. Bouthaina, welcome.
03:19First of all, how do you read the interactions in social media with the proposed modified suggestions?
03:28Yes, in the name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate.
03:31Of course, the Moroccan society, especially in the field of virtual communication and the virtual world,
03:40there was a great interaction with these modifications raised by the Council of His Majesty Muhammad VI, may God bless him.
03:51These interactions are undoubtedly discussions in which the opinion and the opinion of others are discussed.
04:00Of course, the best thing in this discussion is to highlight different opinions and different points of view.
04:09However, we sometimes notice that there are some excesses in the correct understanding of the modifications.
04:16Or there is modification.
04:18Ms. Bouthaina, because the voice does not reach us well from the source, we apologize to you.
04:24How can you provide a legal explanation for the high standards of the scientific council,
04:31for example, in rejecting the use of genetic experience to trace the lineage,
04:36to abolish violence and to allow inheritance between Muslims and non-Muslims.
04:40These points specifically created a wide debate on social media sites.
04:44Of course, this is what I wanted to say, that there is some misunderstanding of the modifications.
04:52On the other hand, we understand the purposes, purposes, analysis and reasons, etc.
04:58Sometimes when we talk about the preservation of women in custody after divorce,
05:07and the preservation of the spouse over her children,
05:10it is certainly exaggerated in a vulgar way that the first husband will spend on the second husband or the divorced husband.
05:20While the spouse here is not related to the divorced spouse,
05:23but it is the spouse of the children who are the children of the man or the first husband.
05:30And one of the characteristics of men is that he will spend on his children,
05:34even if they get married, that is, his wife, even if they get married,
05:37the children's relationship with the mother remains stable.
05:40And one of the qualities of men is that no one spends on his children other than him.
05:44This is one of the customs and customs of Morocco,
05:49that no one spends on his children other than the man himself, and he does not accept it.
05:52Rather, he does not accept from the point of view of women,
05:55that his divorced husband spends on his children or takes care of them.
06:00So there are some mistakes in this matter.
06:04Among the mistakes, and I will return to the law,
06:08that when a woman divorces or breaks the contract of the spouse,
06:13the house of the spouse and the properties are divided equally.
06:17And this is also not one of the requirements for modification,
06:21but the origin is that there is a demand for certain cases related to the maintenance of houses,
06:28in order to spend life and life in household chores,
06:32which have become advanced in modern times,
06:37not limited only to cleaning and cooking,
06:40but the woman is a teacher, a driver, a nurse, a cook, etc.
06:45So she spends her life in these tasks,
06:48and after that, when the marriage contract is resolved, she becomes homeless.
06:52So I think it is also from the logic of justice,
06:55and from the logic of achieving equality,
06:58and removing harm from this woman,
07:00who cannot say that she does not work,
07:02that she does not stop working,
07:04that she does not have a share of the property,
07:07which the husband was indebted to in collecting these properties.
07:11So the matter is not fair, or a quarter, or anything,
07:14but it is an appreciation of the effort that this wife made during the life of the husband.
07:19So this is the logic of justice, and the logic of equality.
07:22Back to the legislative approach,
07:25or to the rejection of the Supreme Council of Science for the three points,
07:29as mentioned in the report,
07:31there is acceptance and approval of many amendments,
07:35considering that they do not touch on the critical texts,
07:38considering that they affect the interest of the messenger,
07:41but there is a response and rejection of some points, or some amendments,
07:45which are related first to the abolition of the rule of law,
07:50meaning that when daughters die, the father inherits them,
07:56and does not inherit them,
07:58meaning the abolition of the widows, and the abolition of the sons of widows,
08:01and the abolition of any man to intervene in the division of the family.
08:04Of course, this cannot be accepted by the Supreme Council of Science,
08:07and the Supreme Council of Science did not accept it,
08:09because it contradicts and goes against a legislative text,
08:13and the Supreme Council of Science cannot work with him,
08:16but they worked in his light,
08:18and they found some solutions,
08:20and that is that there is an obligation during the father's life
08:25to give the property,
08:28but with the rule of law,
08:30meaning that one of the conditions of the obligation
08:33is that the heir should have this property,
08:36and if he does not have it during his life,
08:38the obligation is abolished.
08:40The obligation that is now in the family law
08:43is that the father should give,
08:45but the inheritance of the daughters to this property,
08:47or to this house,
08:49or something of this tribe,
08:50is only possible after the death of the father.
08:52This was an obligation,
08:54and it was also an obligation of the will
08:56in relation to the religion,
08:59to inherit the non-Muslim from the Muslim.
09:02Regarding the second point, Dr.
09:04What point? The point of genetic experience?
09:08Regarding genetic experience,
09:10of course, he also rejected the third point
09:12in which the Supreme Council of Science also refused
09:14to rely on genetic experience to prove the inheritance,
09:16but he also agreed and agreed to rely
09:19on biological building,
09:21meaning that the father is responsible
09:23for the birth of a child outside the marital area,
09:27this father is responsible for this son,
09:31and a shared responsibility between the woman and the man.
09:34In the current legal system,
09:37all responsibilities are assigned to the woman,
09:39and no responsibility is assigned to the man,
09:41who does not have to provide for her,
09:43or a civil liability, or anything of this kind.
09:45But now, with this modification,
09:47with genetic experience,
09:49we prove the biological building,
09:51and we prove the inheritance,
09:53which is not a biological relationship,
09:55but a social relationship,
09:57a legal relationship,
09:59since the relationship is not legal,
10:01it is impossible to claim that it is a legal building.
10:03And specifically, it should have been clarified,
10:05because there was a confusion,
10:07especially on social media sites,
10:09perhaps also one of the issues that needs to be clarified more,
10:14Doctor, I mean,
10:16what is related...
10:18Yes, it is said in social media
10:20that our sons and daughters,
10:22that they circulate information
10:24that is sometimes very wrong,
10:26very wrong.
10:28So, I am responsible for the media,
10:30for religious speech, for educational speech,
10:32to clarify and clarify,
10:34first of all,
10:36the reality of the modification,
10:38then the pros and cons.
10:40Then the pros,
10:42why this complete rejection?
10:44Why do they think that this modification
10:46came for the victory of women,
10:48or for...
10:50That's right,
10:52we also heard that
10:54young people are talking about marriage,
10:56and now they will...
10:58They threaten,
11:00that we will get rid of marriage,
11:02we will leave the country,
11:04and so on,
11:06when, on the contrary,
11:08this issue is not a woman's issue.
11:10I, as a woman,
11:12talk about the modification,
11:14without a doubt,
11:16my son will have a wife.
11:18I mean,
11:20I don't just start as a woman,
11:22but as a mother,
11:24I have a role in the family,
11:26I talk about my son's position,
11:28and there is also one point,
11:30which created a wide debate,
11:32the issue of giving women custody,
11:34even after their marriage,
11:36and the legal guardianship over their children.
11:38Yes, this is a very strange issue,
11:40how do we realize that the issue
11:42is a matter of getting used to,
11:44and sometimes a matter of habits,
11:46and habits that are embedded in our minds.
11:48We accept that the man,
11:50or the father,
11:52marries again,
11:54and is not deprived of custody,
11:56and of her children.
11:58This means that we allow this child
12:00to live with the mother's husband,
12:02and we do not allow him
12:04to live with the mother's husband.
12:06At the same time,
12:08who is closer,
12:10and where can we achieve
12:12the best benefit for the child?
12:14Is it in living with the father's wife,
12:16or in living with the mother's husband?
12:18Of course, without a doubt,
12:20we know, in reality and socially,
12:22that the child is always guaranteed
12:24protection, care,
12:26and psychological stability with the mother,
12:28whether she is married or unmarried.
12:30We know very well that
12:32we have many cases
12:34when they move to live with the father's wife,
12:36there are many difficulties.
12:38So, in terms of achieving
12:40the best benefit for the child,
12:42because, frankly,
12:44the current family law
12:46allows the mother
12:48to maintain custody,
12:50even if she is married,
12:52even if the child
12:54does not have special needs.
12:56This did not cause any inconvenience
12:58for society,
13:00there was no limit.
13:02The goal of these amendments,
13:04Doctor,
13:06is the best interest
13:08and the promotion of the Moroccan family.
13:10Dr. Bouthaina Al-Ghalbzouri,
13:12a member of the Local Science Council in Rabat,
13:14thank you very much.
13:22Article 54,
13:24or as some call it,
13:26the sword of power
13:28over the necks
13:30of journalists and activists,
13:32was not just
13:34a legal text with 38
13:36sections
13:38and severe penalties,
13:40but was a symbol of controversy
13:42and division in Tunisia.
13:44This is the article issued
13:46by the Tunisian president
13:48in 2022
13:50calling for a fight
13:52against e-crime,
13:54which quickly became a tool
13:56for dozens of journalists,
13:58lawyers, politicians
14:00and lawmakers in the country
14:02to return to justice.
14:04This article did not
14:06pass the court
14:08on social media sites.
14:10Criticism escalated
14:12and the voices demanded
14:14to review the article or cancel it.
14:16Journalists and lawyers
14:18called it a sword of power
14:20over the necks,
14:22while the authorities
14:24considered it necessary
14:26to fight e-crime.
14:28We will comment on this issue
14:30with the thankfulness
14:32of Ms. Najat Zammouri,
14:34deputy Tunisian rapporteur
14:36to defend human rights
14:38in Tunisia.
14:40First,
14:42how do you comment
14:44on the big interaction
14:46between the two sides
14:48who saw the authorities
14:50coming to fight e-crime
14:52while others saw it
14:54as a way to narrow
14:56the gap on the opposition?
14:58Yes, first of all,
15:00thank you for the introduction.
15:02We consider it, as you said,
15:04we call it the ill-intentioned
15:06because it is
15:08the words of the truth
15:10that I want it to be false.
15:12To resist the two sides
15:14of e-crime,
15:16what we achieved
15:18against the dozens,
15:20as you said,
15:22against human rights defenders,
15:24journalists, lawyers
15:26who are currently in prison.
15:28Article 54 is very dangerous
15:30for three reasons.
15:32First,
15:34it contradicts the constitution itself.
15:36The constitution guarantees
15:38freedom of expression,
15:40but Article 54
15:42is a blow to what is left
15:44of the only achievement
15:46that we may be proud of
15:48after the 2011 uprising,
15:50which is freedom of expression,
15:52freedom of publication and freedom of the press.
15:54Therefore, this is the first danger
15:56that it contradicts the constitution itself.
15:58The second danger is that
16:00this Article 54
16:02contains
16:04a lot of nonsense
16:06that contains
16:08all interpretations
16:10by the public prosecution
16:12or by the judges.
16:14Therefore,
16:16there is talk about
16:18hate speech.
16:20Is hate
16:22criminal?
16:24Is hate
16:26what should be criminalized
16:28and should we not criminalize hate?
16:30This remains an open question.
16:32There are also
16:34other words
16:36or expressions
16:38or a wide range
16:40of actions, such as
16:42production, promotion, publication,
16:44sending or preparing data,
16:46false rumors, etc.
16:48This is very dangerous
16:50because it is interpretable
16:52and opens a wide
16:54door for interpretation.
16:56Therefore,
16:58some journalists
17:00and journalists
17:02are currently being pursued
17:04by the judiciary.
17:06The third danger
17:08is the absence
17:10of the constitutional court
17:12that is supposed to look
17:14at the constitution of the laws.
17:16These laws
17:18are therefore not constitutional.
17:20The third danger is that
17:22there is no focus
17:24on the limits of this law.
17:26In view of these reasons
17:28that you mentioned,
17:30and also in view of the increasing
17:32pressure and criticisms,
17:34Tunisia insists on not
17:36violating this statute
17:38and faces increasing international
17:40pressures on public liberties.
17:42Can these pressures
17:44push the authorities to amend
17:46or cancel the statute?
17:48Or will the decision remain
17:50subject to internal balances?
17:52Yes.
17:54Before anything else,
17:56I would like to mention
17:58that the Human Rights Committee
18:00of the United Nations
18:02is working to amend
18:04the constitution
18:06in order to allow
18:08individuals to behave
18:10according to it.
18:12This decision was issued
18:14in 2011.
18:16Yes, there are pressures,
18:18of course,
18:20but I see that the pressures
18:22inside the country
18:24are perhaps trying
18:26to be more serious
18:28in order to pull back.
18:30The freedom of the press
18:32is regulated
18:34by Article 115.
18:36We do not know
18:38why this statute was issued,
18:40while the freedom of the press
18:42and the media sector
18:44are regulated
18:46by Article 111,
18:48which includes
18:50punishments.
18:52Article 54
18:54when we push
18:56journalists and
18:58freedom of the press
19:00to prison,
19:02there is a risk
19:04because the media sector
19:06must regulate
19:08the sector
19:10and we should not
19:12resort to prison sentences.
19:14Perhaps,
19:16Ms. Najat,
19:18time is running out.
19:20Please continue.
19:22When this statute
19:24is issued,
19:26when we punish
19:28a public servant
19:32in the government,
19:34this is a risk.
19:36Why?
19:38We consider
19:40government employees
19:42to be monitored
19:44and to be criticized
19:46to improve their performance.
19:48The idea has reached
19:50Ms. Najat Al-Zammouri,
19:52the deputy head of the Tunisian
19:54Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
20:00In 2024,
20:02which we will say goodbye to in a few days,
20:04the Moroccan caftan has witnessed
20:06a great and unprecedented
20:08popularity in many international
20:10fairs.
20:12This traditional dress,
20:14which is a symbol of Moroccan
20:16culture and tradition,
20:18is characterized by its attractiveness
20:20and the elegance of its designs,
20:22the Moroccan caftan,
20:24which dates back to many centuries,
20:26has become one of the symbols of pride
20:28in the Moroccan cultural identity.
20:30It is made of the best fabrics
20:32and decorated with traditional decorations
20:34that reflect the high professionalism
20:36and artistic creativity
20:38of the Moroccan traditional craftsmen
20:40and designers,
20:42who have a wide imagination
20:44in creativity
20:46to travel the era
20:48while preserving
20:50the essence of the caftan.
20:52On every occasion, whether it is
20:54international fairs or cultural events,
20:56the caftan can catch the eye
20:58and amaze the Arab
21:00and international
21:02audience.
21:06Thank you
21:08Mr. Mustafa Jallouk,
21:10the Director of Cultural Heritage
21:12at the Ministry of Youth, Culture
21:14and Communication.
21:16Thank you, sir, for joining us.
21:18The Moroccan caftan
21:20has become rich in
21:22recognition and
21:24attracts the eyes
21:26of the world in general.
21:28What distinguishes it
21:30from other
21:32traditional
21:34international garments?
21:36First of all, thank you for the invitation
21:38and the invitation.
21:40As you said, the Moroccan caftan
21:42is only famous
21:44in the Arab world
21:46and internationally.
21:48The fame of the caftan
21:50is not limited to
21:52great personalities,
21:54without mentioning the names,
21:56there are great actors,
21:58heads of states,
22:00singers.
22:02The value
22:04and fame of the caftan
22:06came first because
22:08it is handmade.
22:10I am one of the women and men
22:12of this country
22:14who are proud of their heritage
22:16and traditional craftsmanship
22:18in our ancient cities.
22:20The caftan
22:22is a life of the Moroccan people.
22:24It is not only
22:26related to weddings
22:28or parties, but also
22:30to daily customs
22:32such as holidays,
22:34weddings, parties.
22:36Even the old women
22:38used to wear the caftan
22:40on a daily basis at home.
22:42The caftan has many forms.
22:44There is a daily caftan,
22:46a wedding caftan,
22:48a wedding caftan, a wedding caftan.
22:50There are many caftans in Morocco
22:52because it is a living heritage.
22:54What distinguishes the Moroccan caftan
22:56is that it is a living heritage.
22:58People make and create
23:00in it.
23:02For example, the caftan
23:04is known for its knots.
23:06Every region is known
23:08for its caftan
23:10and what distinguishes it
23:12from other regions.
23:14The Moroccan caftan
23:16is a living heritage.
23:18What distinguishes the Moroccan caftan
23:20is that it is a living heritage.
23:22When a Moroccan or a foreign woman
23:24wears the caftan,
23:26does she feel that she is a living heritage?
23:28Yes, she is a living heritage.
23:30She is a living heritage
23:32for women.
23:34No other clothing
23:36can give the same feeling
23:38as the Moroccan caftan.
23:40This is what makes
23:42some great actors
23:44and politicians.
23:46For example, Hillary Clinton
23:48wearing the caftan
23:50is a luxury.
23:52It is a long dress.
23:54It does not need to show
23:56that it is a Moroccan caftan.
23:58It is a world-famous caftan.
24:00However, you can see
24:02on social media
24:04that there is a butterfly
24:06in the name of the Moroccan caftan.
24:08There are always questions
24:10about why it was not
24:12officially introduced
24:14in UNESCO
24:16until now,
24:18knowing that in 2025
24:20the Moroccan caftan
24:22will be introduced in UNESCO.
24:24Moroccan citizens
24:26should know
24:28that Morocco
24:30is a cultural sector.
24:32There were studies
24:34to prepare many elements
24:36of Moroccan non-material heritage
24:38so that UNESCO can
24:40be recognized.
24:42These studies
24:44include many elements
24:46including the caftan.
24:48People should know that
24:50the caftan was introduced
24:52two years ago.
24:54However, UNESCO
24:56recommends that
24:58one element should be registered
25:00every two years.
25:02The caftan should be registered
25:04every two years.
25:06This was used
25:08by other countries
25:10to put a label
25:12so that the Moroccan citizens
25:14can be assured
25:16that the caftan was not registered.
25:18This is what we want to know.
25:20Do you have any doubt
25:22that the Moroccan caftan
25:24was not introduced in UNESCO
25:26in another country?
25:28I was a minister
25:30in a sector
25:32like Morocco
25:34in UNESCO.
25:36I want to tell the truth
25:38so that people can understand.
25:40The caftan was not registered
25:42in Algeria.
25:44There are three reasons.
25:46First,
25:48the decision to register
25:50the caftan
25:52was considered
25:54by all UNESCO countries
25:56including the committee
25:58to decide
26:00whether to register
26:02the caftan or not.
26:04The decision
26:06was considered
26:08by all countries
26:10to decide
26:12whether to register
26:14the caftan or not.
26:16We recently saw
26:18your objections
26:20to the registration of the caftan
26:22in Algeria.
26:24The decision is there
26:26in UNESCO.
26:28It is not only
26:30about the caftan.
26:34Secondly,
26:36the state
26:38that gives the caftan
26:40after the registration
26:42does not include the caftan.
26:44Thirdly,
26:46the registration
26:48of the caftan
26:50in front of all countries
26:52is a right of the state
26:54to show
26:56the pictures of the element.
26:58The committee in Algeria
27:00censors the picture
27:02of the caftan.
27:04The video in which the caftan is shown
27:06is also censored.
27:08This means that UNESCO
27:10does not recognize the picture
27:12of the caftan.
27:14This is an important clarification.
27:16We will end this episode
27:18and wait for 2025.
27:20The caftan will be
27:22the art and tradition of the Moroccan caftan.
27:24We do not want to hide it.
27:26It will be the Moroccan caftan.
27:28Thank you very much,
27:30Mr. Mostafa Jelouk,
27:32Director of the Ministry of Youth, Culture and Communication.
27:34Thank you for being with us today.
27:36Thank you,
27:38dear viewers,
27:40for following us.
27:42We will see you next week
27:44for new interactions on social media.
27:46Thank you to the technical team
27:48and the director, Mohamed Afifi.