default
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00There for 7 hours, how many number of hours he was questioned, I do not know, but 7 hours
00:05the process has taken place and then once that process is started and ATR has instructed
00:15his advocate to inform the Supreme Court about that case and withdraw it because we already
00:25started participating in the investigation. So, while that is the actual situation, based
00:35on his instructions, he withdrew the, the advocate withdrew the appeal, but that is
00:45the actual thing that has happened in the Supreme Court, but a section of new electronic
00:52media, they are giving misleading versions to the people, which is actually not correct
01:02for the media to do this kind of activities. If they want to support the Congress party,
01:10let them support openly, nothing stops them, but falsifying the facts regarding a court
01:25case, it is very objectionable, they should not do this. And now, since this is the context,
01:36I want to remind that about the case filed by Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi in connection
01:43with the National Herald case, they also filed a case like this, they also withdrew the case
01:49in the very same fashion. Then what is the answer by the Congress people for that? If
01:57Sonia Gandhi, ED, see tomorrow the ED investigation is there, notice is served on CKTR Rahul and
02:08my information is, he is attending the enquiry. He is attending the enquiry, I think they
02:21will also allow the advocate to be present in the enquiry. That kind of activity that
02:28is good and if the KTR seeks the court to permit to withdraw the case, how it is wrong?
02:38So you see, if they want to propagate for their cause, let them do that, nobody will
02:47stop it. But really they should not falsify the issue, particularly which has taken place
02:54before the court. That is very objectionable and we condemn that and we want the people
03:03to see the difference between what they are saying and what actually has happened. Thank you.