"If we read the 26th Constitutional Amendment, it is clearly written that..." Imran Waseem
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Mr. Imran Wasim, if I may say this in my own words,
00:03there was no secret in the past that Mr. Faiz Ishaq's thinking was completely different from Mr. Mansoor Ali Shah's thinking.
00:10There was a dispute, not a fight, but a clear-cut dispute.
00:16Both of them wrote to each other and told each other things in public information.
00:20One told me that he thinks this way and the other told me that he thinks that way.
00:24Unfortunately, this new court, which has Mr. Sarwara Iyya Afridi,
00:30and Mr. Aini Amin, and here Mr. Mansoor Ali Shah, who are new to the things,
00:35do you think this case is being handled in the same way, Mr. Imran Wasim?
00:41Look, Mr. Wasim, if we compare what has happened in the Supreme Court today with the past,
00:49and take a comparative analysis, then there is a lot to say.
00:52Today, Justice Ayesha Malik Sahiba was saying that the judicial order,
00:55how can you change it through an administrative order?
00:59So, if we go back two or one and a half years,
01:02then there was an order of Qadhi Faiz Ishaq as well,
01:04that order was also changed by the registrar of the Supreme Court on the administrative side,
01:09and then that case was handed over to Qadhi Faiz Ishaq's bench, to his bench.
01:14And probably, according to my memory, Justice Ayesha Malik Sahiba was present in that bench.
01:19Today, when she was raising the question that how can a judicial order be changed through an administrative order,
01:25then she should have remembered that point, that case,
01:29that when she herself was sitting in a bench in which a judicial order was changed through an administrative order.
01:35But now the time has also changed, Mr. Wasim Bidami.
01:37When all that was happening, then there was no practice and procedure law.
01:41At that time, the Chief Justice used to be the Master of Roaster.
01:43At that time, there was no 26th amendment as well.
01:46Now, no matter how much we go into the debate,
01:48these objections are of the judge.
01:50Obviously, if this storm does not stop tomorrow, it will not stop the day after tomorrow.
01:54On 27th January, the requests against the 26th amendment have been fixed for the society.
01:59The decision will be made on the requests for the 26th amendment.
02:02After that, this storm should stop.
02:05If you ask my opinion,
02:07then the case that is being talked about repeatedly,
02:09the judicial order is being talked about,
02:11it is being talked about looking at it on the administrative side,
02:14if we read the 26th amendment,
02:16if we take a look at the 26th amendment,
02:19then obviously, the Constitution of Pakistan says that
02:22the power to make a bench is of the committee.
02:25In that committee, there is Yaya Preeti.
02:27In that committee, there is Justice Mansoor Ali Shah.
02:29In that committee, there is Aminuddin Khan.
02:31So, when this matter was sent to that committee on 16th January,
02:36at that time, the committee made a bench.
02:38Didn't Mr. Mansoor Ali Shah say that he is a member of that committee,
02:42as you said, but I don't know anything about this matter.
02:45This order cannot be made.
02:47The command of the Constitution,
02:49the requirement of the Constitution,
02:50this decision that which bench will be made,
02:53which judge will sit,
02:54and this is not a part-hard case.
02:56It is not a part-hard case at all.
02:58A part-hard case is that you have started the argument of Bukla on it.
03:02Here, the argument of Bukla did not even start at one point.
03:06Okay, let's conclude this.
03:07Mr. Imran Hussain,
03:10the Justice Aqeel Abbasi who has been included in this case,
03:13who has heard this case in Hussain Dhai Court,
03:15has been included by the committee.
03:16I am surprised that the judges do not even know that the file is in front of them
03:20and they know from where this appeal has come.
03:22I think that Mr. Mansoor Ali Shah did not know.
03:26The Aqeel Abbasi who has been included,
03:28he came to the roaster on 8th January.
03:31He had come to the roaster on 8th January.
03:33He had ordered to do the arbitration till 16th January.
03:36So, according to the judges roaster on 8th January,
03:40Justice Aqeel Abbasi had to come and sit.
03:43Justice Aqeel Abbasi is a permanent member of Mansoor Ali Shah's bench.
03:49He is a permanent member.
03:50Irfan Saadat Khan Sahib was included only for three days
03:54during which Justice Aqeel Abbasi was on leave.
03:57You have to find this out.
03:58Okay, Mr. Saqib, tell me one last thing.
04:01I saw the news a little while ago.
04:03Did you get any content or did you get any letters or letters again?
04:06I saw a letter from Mr. Yaya a little while ago.
04:08Mr. Mansoor has written a letter.
04:09I don't know who has written it.
04:10Has there been any such information?
04:12No, I think there are news about the letter.
04:15The letter has not come in front of us.
04:17But ultimately, these judges are also found in the tea room.
04:21And whatever the situation is,
04:23these things will be put in front of the Chief Justice.
04:28Okay, he is in the committee.
04:30But ultimately, they have to see that…
04:33Yes, a little…
04:36The people of the registrar's office will be kept in the middle.
04:39Okay, thank you very much.