Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin is confident that the Supreme Court (SC) would not nullify the P6.235-trillion 2025 national budget, citing the need for the government to function.
READ: https://mb.com.ph/2025/1/24/bersamin-SC-wont-nullify-2025budget
Subscribe to the Manila Bulletin Online channel! - https://www.youtube.com/TheManilaBulletin
Visit our website at http://mb.com.ph
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/manilabulletin
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/manila_bulletin
Instagram: https://instagram.com/manilabulletin
Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@manilabulletin
#ManilaBulletinOnline
#ManilaBulletin
#LatestNews
READ: https://mb.com.ph/2025/1/24/bersamin-SC-wont-nullify-2025budget
Subscribe to the Manila Bulletin Online channel! - https://www.youtube.com/TheManilaBulletin
Visit our website at http://mb.com.ph
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/manilabulletin
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/manila_bulletin
Instagram: https://instagram.com/manilabulletin
Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@manilabulletin
#ManilaBulletinOnline
#ManilaBulletin
#LatestNews
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00So, I would just like to relay to you that the President is really in earnest in seeing
00:07to the proper implementation of the budget, the surviving parts of the budget because
00:14as you know, there were several items that were subjected to veto or to conditional implementation.
00:23Q. Sir, may we have your reaction to what Rep. Ungab said that he plans to bring to the Supreme Court this issue of veto?
00:34A. I cannot stop Congressman Ungab and similarly minded people who would want to put up a challenge.
00:46Our problem there is that we will not be responsible if there is a lack in that because it is a BICAM report.
00:57We have nothing to do with the BICAM report.
01:00We only have to do with the finished product that was signed by the President, not the blank check.
01:10Q. Sorry, Secretary, E.S. Bersman, Sir.
01:13Did you discuss in your forum what will be the implication of the looming legal constitutional challenges in the budget?
01:24A. We still do not know what the complexion of the challenges will be.
01:31We are just receiving this from the media that there will be challenges.
01:37But until we see the actual complexion of whatever challenges may be mounted, it is speculative for us to say or comment on any of them.
01:51Q. But what will be the scenario should it come to that, that there will be a legal challenge in the budget and then the Supreme Court steps in and declares it unconstitutional?
02:01How will it happen in our budget?
02:04A. The Supreme Court will never stop the budget from being implemented.
02:09I cannot understand if the Supreme Court will have that tendency to put a stop to it, even if any of those challengers will ask for a TRO, because the government must function, must be run.
02:25Now, they will say, fall back on the re-enacted budget.
02:29But the re-enacted budget can come only when there is a finding that it has been vetoed or the Supreme Court has nullified the present budget.
02:41But that is yet to be in the end of the year or maybe when this resolution of these challenges will have been delivered.
02:51But right now, the government must continue to function.
02:55There is a duly approved budget subject to all those that were vetoed the items.
03:01As we have been clearly telling, the effect of the veto is only to reduce the deficit, because that is all that the veto has as a consequence.
03:19The realignments will happen only later on in the spending process.
03:49The PBBM and our President are aware of the so-called blank items.
03:53That is why it is our job to go back to our President so that each agency can continue to talk to each other
04:01so that the projects and programs that were affected by the vetoed budgets can be addressed.
04:11Let us get out of your consciousness that we have something to do with the blank pages that you are saying.
04:23That is why we resented so much the impression that the President was given a blank check.
04:31We have nothing to do with that.
04:33That is internal to the Congress.
04:36And that is why we also respect the boundaries by not commenting on who is to be blamed or not.
04:44But I am sure that we did not benefit at all from the blank spaces that are being peddled around.
04:54That is why we are saying that it is fake news.
04:56Because the President is being asked to fill up.
05:00Even if that is not what they said, that is the impression they want to give to the public
05:06which is very wrong, very malicious.
05:10That is why I came out with a very strong statement there.
05:12And the President was very blunt also in saying that whatever the former President was saying about this is a lie.
05:22I want the people to know that we have nothing to do with that.
05:26Ask the Congressmen and Senators.
05:30And that is all that we can say at this point.