Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Please tell us that the negotiations are going on and Mr. Hamid Raza, the translator of the Negotiations Committee, is holding a press conference.
00:05And there are so many policemen outside. Sheikh Waqas says that we should leave from the 18th house of the 17th house, otherwise there was a plan to arrest us.
00:12This was not a good gesture. If Mr. Jarana had not been there, we would not have been arrested.
00:17But everyone saw that the police had come. He is saying that we should leave from the 18th house, otherwise we would have been arrested.
00:20This gesture was not appropriate.
00:23The first thing is that PTI and PTI's followers, youngsters, are far ahead in making statements. We are far behind them.
00:39Yes, we agree.
00:40The second thing is that is there a single video, is there a single such thing, is there a single such testimony,
00:50is there a single picture taken from a camera in today's time, in which the police are chasing and the walls are collapsing?
00:58There is a video of the police in the outskirts of that building.
01:03Which Mr. Jarana went to give security.
01:05What does security mean?
01:07Presence.
01:09Look, there is presence.
01:11I will come to the third thing.
01:13There is definitely presence.
01:15No one caught them, no one arrested them.
01:17If they spread the walls out of fear and went somewhere, then they went.
01:22There was no warrant for their arrest.
01:24Why did the police go there?
01:26Hamidullah Press Conference is going on inside. Why did the police go there?
01:29No, sometimes such reports are found that there is a threat of insecurity or something is going to happen.
01:36It was not a press conference.
01:38It was not a protest.
01:40No, I am giving the last argument for this.
01:44Okay, they went to arrest them.
01:48They have been abused.
01:50There is a curse there.
01:52Their home or their school has been sanctified.
01:56Okay, this is the claim.
01:59I also agree with the argument.
02:03But this incident happened in the evening.
02:07They had announced the boycott at 11 or 11.30 pm.
02:11When they left the jail.
02:13Mr. Ali Gauhar.
02:15And if you listen to Mr. Ali Gauhar in any program or in this program.
02:19What does he say?
02:21Does he even take the name that there has been an attack, so we are boycotting?
02:25Yes, he does not say.
02:28Yes, he does not say.
02:30So Mr. Khan's tweet came out a lot.
02:32It came out after a long time.
02:34He got ready somewhere in America and came from there.
02:38When they boycotted or when Mr. Khan said no more talks.
02:42So was this incident done at that time?
02:44So your claim is that when Mr. Gauhar announced that Mr. Khan said to end the negotiation.
02:50Until then the police did not go.
02:52Until then this incident did not happen.
02:54Truth or false.
02:56If this incident had happened.
02:58Then the arguments for the boycott that are now being drawn.
03:02Ali Gauhar would have given this argument there too.
03:04That one, Mr. Khan is saying this.
03:06Second, our leaders or our translators.
03:10Mr. Ahmed Reza Khan.
03:12He did this at his house.
03:14He would have elaborated and issued a statement.
03:16This statement has not come.
03:18It has not come for hours.
03:20It has not come from any side.
03:22This argument has been drawn in the evening.
03:25And there is no truth in it.
03:27In your opinion.
03:29At least in the near future.
03:31It seems difficult to start negotiations again.
03:33At present.
03:35In my personal opinion.
03:37We should not be readily available.
03:39We should think.
03:41Are these people such that serious negotiations can be done with them?
03:45And if there will be a conversation.
03:47Prime Minister will sit.
03:49Or Mr. Mian will sit.
03:51So I will give this opinion.
03:53Thank you very much, Irfan Siddiqui.