👉 En un hecho sin precedentes, las Cámaras Civil, Laboral y del Crimen han decidido no acatar un fallo de la Corte Suprema de Justicia que establece al Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Capital Federal como instancia revisora. Esta decisión podría desencadenar un efecto dominó en otras instancias judiciales y plantea serias implicaciones sobre el principio de legalidad. La polémica surge en medio del caso Levinas, que ha generado debate sobre la jurisdicción judicial en Buenos Aires. La Corte Suprema observa con preocupación, mientras se especula sobre posibles acciones del Consejo de la Magistratura ante este desafío a su autoridad.
👉 Seguí en #BuenDíaA24
📺 a24.com/vivo
👉 Seguí en #BuenDíaA24
📺 a24.com/vivo
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00I do talk a lot with the people of the court, everything that happens in the court and in the lower courts is very funny.
00:08Yes, we could say that we are facing a rebellion on the farm, Luis.
00:13It looks like it.
00:14Because the Supreme Court of Justice, which is the highest authority in legal matters,
00:19the last word in legal matters in our country,
00:23signed a failure last year, already closing the year,
00:27saying that the Supreme Court of Justice of the federal capital
00:35is a reviewing body of the national chambers with a seat in the city of Buenos Aires.
00:41Directly to the Supreme Court of Justice?
00:43Of course.
00:44It has to go to the Supreme Court.
00:45As if it were a provincial court.
00:47Indeed, with that rank and with that power.
00:50What happened is that the civil chamber, the labor chamber and the criminal chamber
00:57reported that they were not going to accept the failure of the Supreme Court of Justice.
01:03The court looks at this decision with concern,
01:07but it also remains firm in the criterion already affirmed.
01:11Look at what these three chambers say,
01:14that it is expected that it will be like a domino effect
01:16and that they are not the only instances that are rebelled against the Supreme Court of Justice.
01:21This situation, the criterion that the Supreme Court set,
01:25could bring the effect to the principle of legality
01:29for the existence of a court that is not foreseen in the law.
01:33What they say is that they do not recognize the Supreme Court of Justice of the federal capital
01:38as a reviewing body of its failures.
01:41They don't want that body to review its failures because they can't.
01:45You have to remember that the case called Caso Levinas
01:48generated a great controversy
01:51because the local justice was not transferred to the city of Buenos Aires.
01:57The truth is that I do not remember an unprecedented fact
02:00that the chambers meet in full and say, let's not go.
02:03Exactly, there is no precedent.
02:05And some commented in the hallways of the palace,
02:09where the Supreme Court functions,
02:12if this decision of the chambers does not deserve
02:16for an expedient to be opened in the Council of the Magistrate
02:20for non-compliance with something that the Supreme Court of Justice is saying.
02:25Well, the Supreme Court gives an order,
02:27but the subordinates decide, for now, not to accept it.