• yesterday
During a Senate Banking Committee hearing last week, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) spoke about capital gains tax from home sales.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Thank you so much. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank you, Senator Gallego.
00:04Thank you, Mr. Chair. Ms. Willis, Arizona experienced significant population growth
00:07in recent years, which, as you know, brings unique housing challenges. Despite being the
00:11fifth largest city in the U.S., Phoenix receives about 7,400 vouchers, far fewer than Philadelphia,
00:16the sixth largest city, which receives over 22,000 vouchers. This is why I introduced the
00:21Housing Voucher Fairness Act to allocate additional housing choice vouchers in our
00:25fastest-growing cities, which assists families in affordable rental housing.
00:29Can you talk about the unique challenges that fast-growing cities face and solutions
00:33that you have seen actually work?
00:36Thank you for the question, and thank you for the Housing Voucher Fairness Act. So we're happy
00:45to look into this issue, but I think it raises some significant issues, because right now only
00:51one out of four eligible households for housing assistance really gets any help. The others have
00:59to essentially fend for themselves, and that's three out of four. And Congress certainly should
01:04be working to ensure that rental assistance is available universally to all eligible households.
01:12Well, thank you. And one of the things that we discovered, the reason why there is a disparity,
01:17is that the housing voucher allocation is based off the 2000 census. So if you're fast-growing
01:24cities like Houston, Dallas, Las Vegas, you're actually going to be disproportionately penalized
01:32for having good policies and growing, versus some of these older cities that are essentially
01:38atrophying, but yet we're being punished. So even an update just on using the most recent census
01:46would actually be more accurate. And I hope that we'll be working on that legislation too, and I
01:51hope that my colleagues will help join us there. Sure. And I can just add to that too, and I think
01:56it is important you mentioned data, you know, in terms of the data that HUD collects, because we
02:03certainly do, again, going back to wanting to protect those programs and the staff at HUD,
02:09because 76% in the office in HUD is being threatened to cut the staff there. And it
02:20is important to have that data to understand the housing issue and how we can correct it.
02:26Right. And one of the things, since you were talking about cuts, you know, Arizona's unique,
02:30one of the unique states where we have 22 federally recognized tribes, we have the largest
02:34tribal enrollment in the country, you know, lots of land, but of course we have a housing
02:39challenge. So the firing, obviously, of and closing down of some of our tribal Bureau of Indian
02:45Affairs offices makes things difficult, especially when we're trying to apply for housing grants for
02:51some of these tribal nations. So I'm going to introduce as a record a letter that myself and
02:55Senator Kelly wrote about our opposition to the closing of this, of these offices, which again,
03:01will exasperate a housing crisis that's actually on, people don't understand,
03:04we actually have a tribal, on tribal lands, even a housing crisis even there.
03:08I have another question, Mr. Glasser, and this is something that I've noticed, is that many
03:13Californians are moving to Arizona and instead of downsizing their homes, right, they're selling a
03:21pretty valuable property for 1.5 million in California, and then they're just coming to
03:25Arizona and they're buying nearly that amount. What is the, why are they doing that? Explain the
03:30tax implication of why they're doing that. Well, I think, you know, it's the, the, thank you,
03:38thank you, Senator, for that question. I think the, the appeal of Arizona should be obvious to
03:45anyone. Great, I can go on and on. The, and certainly. But the reason they're selling their
03:51house at 1.2 million, and it's a paid-off house, and instead of going and getting, you know, this
03:57retired couple, couple, you know, a man and a woman, partner, whatever it is, instead of going
04:03getting a nice house, a condo, and pocketing the rest of the money, they're not doing that. They're
04:07buying a house almost of equivalent value. What is the reasoning for that? It's not a trick question,
04:11I could answer that. No, no, well, you know, the first order thing is you go to a place where
04:14housing is cheaper, you buy more house, right? We believe as economists that people respond to,
04:18respond to prices, and if price, if housing is cheaper, and, you know, you could easily, you
04:21wouldn't be surprised if you say they said they spent 1.8 million dollars on the house, because
04:25they could get so much more house for their money. Right. In California, in Arizona than in California.
04:28All right, well, the, the reason also is because if that family sells that house, and they don't
04:37buy a house of equivalent or close to equivalent value, they're going to end up paying capital gains
04:42on that house. So a retired couple, instead of trying to just pay the government the money,
04:48which I actually agree with them, they shouldn't pay that, we should figure out a way to actually
04:51give them a capital gains tax cut. Because what actually ends up happening is that then they would
04:56come to Arizona, buy a smaller place, and then they could keep that money, that capital gains
05:02for their own retirement. Instead, what they're doing is they're buying an equivalent house,
05:06at least keep some value. And so I, one of the things I'd love to think about is like, how are
05:11we, you know, basically incentivizing these well-to-do retirees into buying houses that they
05:17don't need to buy, because that's the only thing that actually brings up some level of economic
05:21value and stability. So with that, I apologize, Mr. Chair, because I complained about going over
05:24time, and I yield back my time. Sounds like an opportunity for us to work together. The TCJA
05:31relates to increasing the

Recommended