ਭਾਰਤੀਆਂ ਵਲੋਂ ਪੰਨੂੰ ਮਾਮਲੇ ਵਿਚ ਭਾਰਤੀ ਏਜੰਟ ਨਿਖਿਲ ਗੁਪਤਾ ਨੂੰ ਛੁਡਾਉਣ ਲਈ ਅਮਰੀਕਨ ਡਿਪਲੋਮੈਟਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਅਗਵਾ ਕਰਨ ਦੀਆਂ ਦਿੱਤੀਆਂ ਜਾ ਰਹੀਆਂ ਸਲਾਹਾਂ
ਰਾਕੇਸ਼ ਜੀ ਕਹਿੰਦੇ ਦਿੱਲੀ ਚਾਣਕਿਆਪੁਰੀਓਂ ਕੋਈ ਅਮਰੀਕਨ ਡਿਪਲੋਮੈਟ ਚੁੱਕ ਲਿਆਵੋ ਤੇ ਰਾਅ ਦੇ ਟਿਕਾਣੇ ਲਿਆ ਕੇ ਕੁੱਟੋ, ਫਿਰ ਨਿਖਿਲ ਗੁਪਤਾ ਦੇ ਨਾਲ ਓਹਦਾ ਤਬਾਦਲਾ ਕਰੋ।
ਇਹ ਬਿਆਨ ਪੜ੍ਹ ਕੇ ਅਮਰੀਕਾ ਨੂੰ ਕੰਬਣੀ ਛਿੜੀ ਪਈ ਹੈ। ਖੁਦ ਬਾਈਡਨ ਨੂੰ ਲੱਗਣ ਲੱਗ ਪਿਆ ਕਿ ਕੇਕ ਭੁਲੇਖੇ ਸਾਬਣ ਖਾ ਲਿਆ। ਰੱਸੀ ਭੁਲੇਖੇ ਕੋਬਰਾ ਛੇੜ ਲਿਆ। ਹੁਣ ਕੀਹਨੂੰ ਹਾਕ ਮਾਰੀਏ ਕਿ ਆਣ ਕੇ ਬਚਾ ਲਵੇ! ਕਾਹਨੂੰ ਪੰਗਾ ਲੈਣਾ ਸੀ ਯਾਰ! Foreign Minister Joly was asked by a reporter how U.S. authorities successfully prevented the alleged assassination of a Sikh activist on American soil, while Canadian authorities were unable to do so. How the United States identified & charged a suspect, whereas Canada did not.
Foreign Minister Joly was asked by a reporter how U.S. authorities successfully prevented the alleged assassination of a Sikh activist on American soil, while Canadian authorities were unable to do so. How the United States identified & charged a suspect, whereas Canada did not.
ਰਾਕੇਸ਼ ਜੀ ਕਹਿੰਦੇ ਦਿੱਲੀ ਚਾਣਕਿਆਪੁਰੀਓਂ ਕੋਈ ਅਮਰੀਕਨ ਡਿਪਲੋਮੈਟ ਚੁੱਕ ਲਿਆਵੋ ਤੇ ਰਾਅ ਦੇ ਟਿਕਾਣੇ ਲਿਆ ਕੇ ਕੁੱਟੋ, ਫਿਰ ਨਿਖਿਲ ਗੁਪਤਾ ਦੇ ਨਾਲ ਓਹਦਾ ਤਬਾਦਲਾ ਕਰੋ।
ਇਹ ਬਿਆਨ ਪੜ੍ਹ ਕੇ ਅਮਰੀਕਾ ਨੂੰ ਕੰਬਣੀ ਛਿੜੀ ਪਈ ਹੈ। ਖੁਦ ਬਾਈਡਨ ਨੂੰ ਲੱਗਣ ਲੱਗ ਪਿਆ ਕਿ ਕੇਕ ਭੁਲੇਖੇ ਸਾਬਣ ਖਾ ਲਿਆ। ਰੱਸੀ ਭੁਲੇਖੇ ਕੋਬਰਾ ਛੇੜ ਲਿਆ। ਹੁਣ ਕੀਹਨੂੰ ਹਾਕ ਮਾਰੀਏ ਕਿ ਆਣ ਕੇ ਬਚਾ ਲਵੇ! ਕਾਹਨੂੰ ਪੰਗਾ ਲੈਣਾ ਸੀ ਯਾਰ! Foreign Minister Joly was asked by a reporter how U.S. authorities successfully prevented the alleged assassination of a Sikh activist on American soil, while Canadian authorities were unable to do so. How the United States identified & charged a suspect, whereas Canada did not.
Foreign Minister Joly was asked by a reporter how U.S. authorities successfully prevented the alleged assassination of a Sikh activist on American soil, while Canadian authorities were unable to do so. How the United States identified & charged a suspect, whereas Canada did not.
Category
✨
PeopleTranscript
00:00 The party agents are trying to convince Nikhil Gupta to kidnap American diplomats.
00:15 Rakesh ji says that if you want to go to Delhi, get a diplomat and take him to his place.
00:25 And then talk to Nikhil Gupta.
00:30 Major Gaurav Arya's video is also going viral.
00:36 Listen to this.
00:39 This is the video of the party's leader accusing India of trying to murder Gupta.
00:46 Let me tell you, America is a highly armed nation.
00:50 There is no dearth of weaponry, there is no dearth of mafia, there is no dearth of the criminal underworld in America.
00:57 How difficult is it to whack a person like that?
01:00 Does India have to send a team from India?
01:03 Do we have to send our boys from here to whack Pannu or to eliminate Pannu in America? No, not at all.
01:11 You know, if Pannu is alive, he is only alive because we don't care whether he lives or he doesn't.
01:16 I mean, he is irrelevant as far as we are concerned.
01:19 We have designated him a terrorist but it's not that we are sending teams to eliminate Pannu.
01:23 All you need to do is give 20, 30 thousand rupees or 15 thousand rupees to somebody in the United States of America and people will whack Pannu happily.
01:30 I am sure he goes to the supermarket, I am sure he goes to office.
01:34 It's very easy but we haven't done it, we have never done it.
01:37 And why should we do something like this?
01:39 Why should India give money to certain people and say that okay, you killed this guy, you killed that guy? No, not at all.
01:45 I'll be careful.
01:46 Mr. Speaker, in June, the Canadian Prime Minister claimed the Indian government may be linked to the killing of Canadian Sikh activist, Habib Singh Nijjar in Canada.
01:58 Now it is reported that the US government thwarted a second assassination attempt of a Canadian American citizen on US soil.
02:09 So will the Prime Minister reassure my Sikh constituents who have raised their safety concerns with me
02:16 that this government is taking this matter very seriously and really raised their concern with his counterpart in India?
02:25 Mr. Speaker, I've already made statements on this matter but I'll say crucially of course to ensure the safety of all communities in our country.
02:33 That is the first duty of government and we'll continue to do that, not just for the Sikh community but every community here in the UK.
02:39 John Burrard.
02:40 Thank you Mr. Speaker.
02:42 Sir, I do a full-time massage and part-time Uber in the evening.
02:48 I received an order for food and I was told to deliver food.
02:55 I went to Lakshmi Nayan Temple for food.
02:58 I had an address of Karte Kosh with Lakshmi Nayan Temple.
03:03 But the customer called me and said, "Sir, this is my food which I'm standing in front of the temple. Drop it at the temple."
03:10 I thought to myself, "No, I'm at the temple, I'm a religious person, I shouldn't be delivering food in front of the temple."
03:18 I was told to drop the food at the temple.
03:24 I told him, "No, I'm here, I'm a religious person, I shouldn't be delivering food here."
03:29 But I realised later that those two people were making a video of me in front of the temple.
03:34 When I was delivering food at the temple, I was wondering how to deal with the issue of a Sikh delivering food.
03:43 I was also Ubering.
03:45 But now, when a Sikh person is asking for food, it's not a good thing.
03:51 When a person is playing a game, not all Sikhs and Hindus are getting food.
03:59 The main people are getting food, but the rest of the people are not getting food.
04:04 The common people are getting food, but the rest of the people are not getting food.
04:08 That's what happens.
04:10 This is a very low-key issue.
04:13 This is a very low-key issue.
04:15 I would like to ask you both a question.
04:17 If India has a right to go to the UN, why has the government not allowed it?
04:25 There are two points to that.
04:27 One is that, even without the investigation, the Indian government was not allowed to go there.
04:34 Why?
04:36 There should have been a validation of those powers in the UN.
04:41 Because India was asked to go to the UN.
04:45 If you look at the typical criminal terminology, when someone asks to go to the UN,
04:52 if you are already convicted, then you better go to the UN.
04:55 So we took it in a very different interpretation.
04:59 But we always said that if there is anything specific and relevant,
05:05 and communicated to us, we will go.
05:08 I would like to ask you, though, Mr. Haidkishore,
05:10 if, in fact, India has no role in any of this,
05:14 why is your government not cooperating in the investigation?
05:18 There are two points to that.
05:20 One is that, even without the investigation being concluded, India was convicted.
05:28 Is that a rule of law?
05:31 The allegation was raised, how was India convicted?
05:35 Because India was asked to cooperate.
05:37 If you look at the typical criminal terminology,
05:42 when someone asks to cooperate, which means that you have already been convicted,
05:45 and you better cooperate.
05:47 So we took it in a very different interpretation.
05:52 But we always said that if there is anything specific and relevant,
05:57 and communicated to us, we will look into it.
06:01 And that had been said from day one.
06:04 So we have never said, of course we have not used the word cooperate,
06:07 because we feel that that's humiliating.
06:11 But we have always said that give us something specific and relevant,
06:15 and we look into it.
06:17 So the National Security Advisor, for example, for this country,
06:20 was in India for a total of nine days, I believe, over August and September.
06:24 Are you telling me that no specificity was shared with the Indian government
06:28 by the National Security Advisor,
06:29 that not a single specific allegation was presented to the Indian government
06:35 and asked for cooperation?
06:37 So conversations took place, but we needed something specific and relevant
06:43 to go back to our law or legal authorities,
06:47 to seek permission to do investigation that we would have wanted to do.
06:51 So till the time that those kinds of inputs are not there,
06:55 in a country of rule of law,
06:58 it will not be possible for us to move forward on the investigations.
07:02 But I see what you're saying about cooperation and the ask for cooperation.
07:07 But I'm also thinking of criminal trials that take place here, for example,
07:11 when something has been alleged and nobody has been convicted.
07:15 The person who is accused has to cooperate in some way
07:19 with the legal proceedings that take place, right?
07:21 It's not necessarily a de facto conviction.
07:24 It's just asking for a very serious allegation to be taken as such,
07:30 and India to do all it can, if in fact, as you claim,
07:33 the government is completely innocent of any of the accusations,
07:37 to do all that it can to prove that.
07:41 Absolutely. We have never said no.
07:44 All we are asking is to give something specific and relevant to the government.
07:48 Unless that is there, what do I follow up with?
07:52 I just have a hard time believing that our national security advisor,
07:55 the top security official in this country,
07:57 would go to your country for nine days and not say,
08:00 "Here's what we know. Here's what we think happened.
08:03 Can you please substantiate this one way or the other?"
08:08 Listen, until the time it is not specific or relevant to the case,
08:12 we will not be able to respond to it.
08:14 There could be a lot of conversation.
08:16 Conversations could have allegations.
08:19 Conversation could have some facts of the case,
08:22 but allegations and facts do not make it specific and relevant.
08:26 So we need to have those facts, and we are always ready to do that.
08:30 If you look at the most recent incident,
08:33 where there are some allegations put out in one of the newspapers against India,
08:38 so let me also talk about that.
08:40 Yes, I'll ask this.
08:41 So, the U.S. did provide us inputs,
08:44 and we have already started following up on that.
08:47 And those inputs were--
08:49 No, I'm sorry. I was going to ask, what are they?
08:51 So those inputs are nexus between gangsters, drug peddlers,
08:57 terrorists, and gun runners in the U.S.
09:03 And there is a belief that some of the Indian connections--
09:07 Now, when I say Indian connections, it's not the government of Indian connections.
09:10 India has 1.4 billion people.
09:12 So some of the Indian connections are there.
09:14 We are ready to investigate.
09:16 Because we have got inputs which are legally presentable.
09:21 Can you explain what you mean?
09:23 I'm curious what that means compared to what you're saying Canada has not presented.
09:28 So what are inputs?
09:30 Are they documents, for example, that they've presented you?
09:32 Intelligence that they shared with you?
09:34 And are you saying that Canada has not done anything similar?
09:37 I don't oversee India-U.S. relations.
09:40 My mandate is India-Canada.
09:42 So I'm not able to go in-depth in that.
09:44 But what I'm telling you is from the statement which has been issued from India.
09:48 And if I read this statement which is in front of me,
09:52 during the course of recent discussions on India-U.S. security cooperation,
09:57 the U.S. side shared some inputs pertaining to nexus between organized criminals,
10:03 gun runners, terrorists, and others.
10:06 The inputs are a cause of concern for both countries.
10:11 And they decided to take necessary follow-up action.
10:16 On its part, India takes such inputs seriously.
10:19 Since it impinges on our own national security interests as well,
10:25 issues in the context of U.S. inputs are already being examined by relevant people in India.
10:30 The accusation that you're referencing there, the statement,
10:32 I just want to make sure our viewers understand that there was a report this week
10:36 from the London-based Financial Times, excuse me, for a separate report
10:40 kind of confirming it in the Associated Press, which cited unnamed officials
10:45 who said U.S. authorities had stopped a conspiracy to assassinate Sikh separatists,
10:49 Gaurab Jwan Singh Pannan, a dual Canada-U.S. citizen.
10:54 The Financial Times also said that the U.S. thwarted the plot to kill that individual
11:00 who was a lawyer in New York, who was among the organizers of a symbolic referendum on Sikh separation,
11:05 and was a personal friend, actually, of Mr. Nijjar here in Canada.
11:08 The newspaper said that U.S. authorities had filed criminal charges related to the matter,
11:12 and India was investigating.
11:14 Are you saying, can I take from that, that it is the filing of the charges that separates this,
11:21 because there have not yet been charges filed in Canada, that prompted different action from India,
11:27 and that is informing the Indian decision not to cooperate in Canada?
11:30 See, one is that the investigation in case of the U.S., as far as I know and understand,
11:35 because again, I don't oversee India-U.S. relations, is at much advanced stage,
11:40 and therefore I presume that there would be better information shared with India.
11:45 And so once again, just for the record, I want to make sure you're saying none of that information,
11:50 no intelligence, no evidence, nothing underlying the very serious accusation the Prime Minister,
11:56 I don't think, would have made unless he thought the allegations were credible,
12:00 none of that has been presented to the Indian government.
12:02 So I'll again repeat my position, that there is no specific or relevant information for us to look into.
12:09 Beyond that note, High Commissioner, I'll leave it there. I appreciate your time today very much. Thank you.
12:13 It has become clear that with this indictment that the U.S. Justice Department has filed,
12:20 India is in that category of transnational repression, and as Congresswoman Mary Scanlon has said,
12:28 we will not tolerate this at all.
12:33 Federal prosecutors have charged an Indian man in an alleged plot to try to assassinate a Sikh political activist in New York City.
12:48 Some of the salient features that have come out of this,
12:54 one of which is that Ajit Dawal's aggressive killing spree line, which started with the assassination of a Sikh political activist,
13:03 I'm also in contact with the Indian Foreign Minister, Jashankar, on this very issue.
13:08 Hi, I'd like to follow up on that point. There's two questions here I'm hoping you can answer.
13:14 One, has India cooperated at all with the Canadian investigation?
13:18 And two, according to this indictment, all of the American authorities were in contact with this person
13:25 who was trying to carry out this alleged murder for hire plot in May and June of this year,
13:33 before the killing that took place in Canada.
13:36 How is it that the Americans were able to prevent an alleged murder for hire plot, but Canadian authorities were unable to?
13:44 So first, Katie, of course, I won't comment the work that is being done by our own law enforcement agencies for two reasons.
13:53 The first one is I respect their independence. We're a rule of law country.
13:57 And second, Minister LeBlanc is the minister that is in charge of public safety.
14:02 But what I can tell you on the diplomatic impacts of our investigation,
14:09 and also what is going on in the U.S., is I have engaged with my Indian counterpart on this very issue.
14:19 We call on their cooperation to make sure that our investigation is able to proceed.
14:31 And also, I still think that the impacts of making public our allegations
14:41 and the fact that they've decided to remove diplomatic immunities to 41 of our diplomats was completely unacceptable.
14:50 And it is clearly my goal to make sure that the 41 diplomats that should be right now working in India are allowed back.
15:01 But Gupta also specifically instructed the UC not to commit the murder around the time of anticipated engagement.
15:12 Because the Modi administration was supposed to start on June 18, and the Indian officials were working from June 8 to June 10.
15:24 So it is likely that when the Indian officials come to America, they should be allowed to go.
15:32 Because it is written in the document that the Gurbani people are popular.
15:36 And the level at which this case has been built,
15:43 and the fact that the Justice Trudeau has been repeatedly asked to provide evidence,
15:50 these two things were interconnected.
15:53 Because the same handler is telling Nikhil Gupta that the case has been closed.
15:58 And the picture of the day of the murder of Hardeep Singh Najjar is being sent as a video clip.
16:06 That it has been successful. Good job.
16:09 And we will see your performance and then give you another task.
16:15 So we understand that this is when there are changes in the teachings of the Akal Purakh.
16:24 And then the coming of the arch, the coming of the yogas, and the world is a family and a family.
16:32 But the Sikh community will also need to understand that to what extent our enemy,
16:39 who has started a total war against us,
16:43 who has started a war against us,
16:45 who has started a war against us,
16:47 who has started a war against us,
16:49 who has started a war against us,
16:51 who has started a war against us,
16:53 who has started a war against us,
16:55 who has started a war against us,
16:57 who has started a war against us,
16:59 who has started a war against us,
17:01 who has started a war against us,
17:03 who has started a war against us,
17:05 who has started a war against us,
17:07 who has started a war against us,
17:09 who has started a war against us,
17:11 who has started a war against us,
17:13 who has started a war against us,
17:15 who has started a war against us,
17:17 who has started a war against us,
17:19 who has started a war against us,
17:21 who has started a war against us,
17:23 who has started a war against us,
17:25 who has started a war against us,
17:27 who has started a war against us,
17:29 who has started a war against us,
17:31 who has started a war against us,
17:33 who has started a war against us,
17:35 who has started a war against us,
17:37 who has started a war against us,
17:39 who has started a war against us,
17:41 who has started a war against us,
17:43 who has started a war against us,
17:45 who has started a war against us,
17:47 who has started a war against us,
17:49 who has started a war against us,
17:51 who has started a war against us,
17:53 who has started a war against us,
17:55 who has started a war against us,
17:57 who has started a war against us,
17:59 who has started a war against us,
18:01 who has started a war against us,
18:03 who has started a war against us,
18:05 who has started a war against us,
18:07 who has started a war against us,
18:09 who has started a war against us,
18:11 who has started a war against us,
18:13 who has started a war against us,
18:15 who has started a war against us,
18:17 who has started a war against us,
18:19 who has started a war against us,
18:21 who has started a war against us,
18:23 who has started a war against us,
18:25 who has started a war against us,
18:27 who has started a war against us,
18:29 who has started a war against us,
18:31 who has started a war against us,
18:33 who has started a war against us,
18:35 who has started a war against us,
18:37 who has started a war against us,
18:39 who has started a war against us,
18:41 who has started a war against us,
18:43 who has started a war against us,
18:45 who has started a war against us,
18:47 who has started a war against us,
18:49 who has started a war against us,
18:51 who has started a war against us,
18:53 who has started a war against us,
18:55 who has started a war against us,
18:57 who has started a war against us,
18:59 who has started a war against us,
19:01 who has started a war against us,
19:03 who has started a war against us,
19:05 who has started a war against us,
19:07 who has started a war against us,
19:09 who has started a war against us,
19:11 who has started a war against us,
19:13 who has started a war against us,
19:15 who has started a war against us,
19:17 who has started a war against us,
19:19 who has started a war against us,
19:21 who has started a war against us,
19:23 who has started a war against us,
19:25 who has started a war against us,
19:27 who has started a war against us,
19:29 who has started a war against us,
19:31 who has started a war against us,
19:33 who has started a war against us,
19:35 who has started a war against us,
19:37 who has started a war against us,
19:39 who has started a war against us,
19:41 who has started a war against us,
19:43 who has started a war against us,
19:45 who has started a war against us,
19:47 who has started a war against us,
19:49 who has started a war against us,
19:51 who has started a war against us,
19:53 who has started a war against us,
19:55 who has started a war against us,
19:57 who has started a war against us,
19:59 who has started a war against us,
20:01 who has started a war against us,
20:03 who has started a war against us,
20:05 who has started a war against us,
20:07 who has started a war against us,
20:09 who has started a war against us,
20:11 who has started a war against us,
20:13 who has started a war against us,
20:15 who has started a war against us,
20:17 who has started a war against us,
20:19 who has started a war against us,
20:21 who has started a war against us,
20:23 who has started a war against us,
20:25 who has started a war against us,
20:27 who has started a war against us,
20:29 who has started a war against us,
20:31 who has started a war against us,
20:33 who has started a war against us,
20:35 who has started a war against us,
20:37 who has started a war against us,
20:39 who has started a war against us,
20:41 who has started a war against us,
20:43 who has started a war against us,
20:45 who has started a war against us,
20:47 who has started a war against us,
20:49 who has started a war against us,
20:51 who has started a war against us,
20:53 who has started a war against us,
20:55 who has started a war against us,
20:57 who has started a war against us,
20:59 who has started a war against us,
21:01 who has started a war against us,
21:03 who has started a war against us,
21:05 who has started a war against us,
21:07 who has started a war against us,
21:09 who has started a war against us,
21:11 who has started a war against us,
21:13 who has started a war against us,
21:15 who has started a war against us,