Lifetime disqualification case | Big News From Supreme Court | Breaking News
#supremecourt #CJP #qazifaezisa #Lifetimedisqualificationcase #breakingnews
Lifetime disqualification case | Big News From Supreme Court | Breaking News
Lifetime disqualification case | Big News From Supreme Court | Breaking News
Transcript
00:00 The Supreme Court has issued a detailed decision on the case of the politicians.
00:05 The Supreme Court's decision on the case of the politicians is being terminated.
00:09 It is written in the detailed decision.
00:11 Chief Justice Kazifa Issa wrote the decision on 53 articles.
00:15 It was said in the decision that in Article 62(1)(f) the case of the politicians is not mentioned.
00:21 The controversial note of Justice Yahya Afridi is also included in the detailed decision.
00:25 Justice Yahya Afridi said that he disagrees with the decision to terminate Nahili.
00:30 Justice Yahya Afridi said that under Article 62(1)(f) Nahili is not permanent or permanent.
00:37 And under Article 62(1)(f) Nahili is limited to the declaration of the court of law.
00:42 It is further written in the note that Nahili remains permanent until the declaration of the court of law.
00:47 The controversial note has been written by Justice Yahya Afridi.
00:50 She further wrote that the decision of the Supreme Court on the case of Samuella Baloch was correct.
00:54 The additional note of Justice Mansoor Alisha is also a part of the detailed decision.
00:58 The decision of the Supreme Court on the case of Samuella Baloch is terminated.
01:02 It is further written in the decision that the Supreme Court tried to change the law by declaring Nahili permanent.
01:09 It is further written in the decision that after the amendment of the election act, Nahili cannot be extended for more than 5 years.
01:15 The permanent Nahili election is contrary to the right of the people to vote.
01:19 If Article 62(1)(f) is read alone, it cannot be punished.
01:23 It is further written in the decision that the former judge Umar Atta Bandiyal wrote the decision of the case of Samuella Baloch and denied it.
01:30 It is further written in the decision that under Article 62(1)(f) Tahayat Nahili is not in accordance with the basic rights.
01:36 Zia ul Haq applied martial law and included Tahayat Nahili's complaint in Article 62(1)(f).
01:41 It was said by the Supreme Court that the court is not considering the scope of the election act in the current case.
01:46 It is further written in the decision that there is no mention in Article 62(1)(f) that what is the court of law.
01:51 [BLANK_AUDIO]