The Multitasking Debate: Efficiency vs. Presence || Acharya Prashant, NIT-Trichy (2024)

Acharya Prashant

~~~~~~~~~~~~~  Video Information: NIT-Trichy, 06.04.2024, Greater Noida  Context: ~ Why an IITian loses focus - and what's the purpose of life ~ Why there is so much suffering in life? ~ Do we suffer by our own choice? ~ How to avoid pain and suffering?   Music Credits: Milind Date  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~  #acharyaprashant #NIT-Trichy

Transcript

00:00Namaskar Acharya ji. I am Lakshya Satheja. I am a faculty member in the department of

00:06architecture over here at NIT Trishul. So my question is that nowadays, I mean in the

00:15last two decades or so, this quality of multitasking has been advertised a lot and everybody wants

00:23to have this particular quality listed under their CVs. But as far as I know, as far as

00:31I believe, our yogic scriptures do not agree with that. They rather say that we should

00:38be present in the moment and we should focus only on the task that we have at hand. So

00:45what is your take on this? Is it a good thing to be a multitasker or is it better to just

00:52be present in the moment and focus on what we are doing currently?

00:57The matter needs to be taken deeper for resolution. Who is the doer? Who is the one choosing tasks

01:10and what does he want? How much of clarity does he have? Please understand. You sit behind

01:19your wheel on the driver's seat, don't you? And you are multitasking all the time. You

01:28are looking at the road, you are looking at the speedometer and if it's a manual thing,

01:33then you are doing the gears. There are three pedals your feet must work on. You also have

01:42to take care of the several lights that might occasionally blink on the dashboard and obviously

01:48you also have to look at unforeseen things like animals and kids and all the stuff on

01:54the road and potholes, not to name them. But in spite of all that multitasking, you are

02:06not multidestined. You are not moving towards multiple destinations. Moving towards one

02:21particular destination that you know for sure you are doing two, three or five things that

02:26are needed to keep moving. Now this is multitasking of one nature where the various tasks are

02:33like various branches of the same tree. That's one thing. Even if you are riding a bicycle,

02:44are you not multitasking? Think of your legs. Think of your eyes. Think of your arms. You

02:50are multitasking. Think of your ears. Even the ears have to do their own task in a particular.

02:59Another kind of multitasking is when you are trying to drive five cars parallelly. One kind

03:07of multitasking is driving one car. I have to take care of the brakes, the accelerator, the clutch,

03:15the gear, the dashboard, the indicators, all those things. That's one kind of multitasking. One car,

03:25one destination and all that needs to be done. I will take care of that because that's what is

03:31needed to reach my one destination. The other thing is I'm a divided self. I'm a fragmented

03:36person. So, I'm driving five different cars towards five different destinations and trying

03:42to manage them, control them all in the same moment. Now this is nonsense and most of what

03:52is happening is this kind of nonsense. Because we do not know ourselves, because the problem

03:59is with self-knowledge. Therefore, we drive five cars at a time. I repeat, please understand the

04:08difference. Driving one car and you would have seen the cockpit of a plane, seen the enormous

04:17number of controls there are or even a high-end vehicle, a four-wheeler. The number of controls

04:27just keeps multiplying as the vehicle keeps rising in sophistication and an attentive driver is

04:39taking care of all the things that there are or a pilot is taking care of all those things. That's

04:47one thing. But mostly because we do not know who we are and therefore what we must do. In our

04:55insecurity, in our blindness, we keep on trying this as well as that and now that kind of multitasking

05:03does not help. That's the multitasking in which you say one task is to go towards the right and

05:12the other task is to go towards the left. All that you in this way drive is a wedge within your

05:24own existence. Right and left and broken, torn. I'm multitasking because I'm trying to please my

05:40boss and wife at the same time. That's multitasking. You cannot. Go to the roots. Let your existence

05:52resemble a tree and then you can branch out as much as you like to. But first of all you have

05:59to be fully earthed. The roots of your existence, the self has to be in tremendous love with the

06:15soil. In Vedanta, we call it the great love that the ego has for the Atma. The roots can be compared

06:27to Aham and the earth can be compared to Atma. Let there be such a deep love that separation

06:37becomes impossible and then from that kind of rooted self, a self in love, there arises a

06:53powerful unshakable trunk and then it prolifically branches out. Now that branching out might be a

07:04kind of multitasking which is okay. So myself I'm multitasking all the time. That's fine. I'm not

07:17multi-minded. I'm not multi-destined. I am one. From there if I have to do several things that's

07:28fine. That's like a dance then. All the things in one particular integrated harmony. Think of a

07:42dancer. Think of the various steps she takes. The hands are moving. Even the eyes are moving in a

07:50particularly graceful way. Even the hair, they are moving and that's adding something to the dance.

07:59The clothes, the feet, the entire body. But all that comes together without division as one holistic

08:12beauty. So look at your own various movements. Is there a core to them? Is there a root to them? Is

08:24there a centrality to them? Or are they like this, this, this and this with no connection between this

08:30and this? When a dancer is dancing, the way her arms move and the way her legs move, they are in

08:40tandem. They are in unison. There are two aspects of the one central thing. But look at most multitaskers.

08:52Look at how they move in that part of their self and in this part of their self and you will find

09:02nothing that unites. There is no relationship. This way they say is their professional life the

09:08boss. This way they say is their personal life, the wife, the mother, the kids and all the rest of it.

09:13And there is just no unity. There is nothing that connects, harmonizes. The most beautiful life is

09:28like a symphony, unending symphony. You must listen to symphonies. The way they rise and fall, the way the

09:40whole experience changes and yet remains the same. And the beauty is that underlying unity. It does

09:50not last just for five minutes. We are not talking of some ordinary song. We are talking of symphonies.

09:56Things keep varying and yet they remain the same. Can your existence be like that? You are in the

10:08gym one moment. You are in the kitchen another moment. Can you still have a unity? Or in the

10:20gym you are trying to beat calories and in the kitchen you are trying to eat calories. There is

10:30no harmony. Not sure whether the examples are going anywhere. Are they? Am I able to communicate

10:42something? Multitasking is an imperative of life. You will have to do that. Even when you are doing

10:50one thing, please pay attention, you are actually doing several things. Even when you think you are

10:56not multitasking, you are actually multitasking. Even as I speak to you, I have to be careful that

11:02I do not get too distant from these two. Am I not multitasking? Even this moment. If I get too

11:09distant, he starts quipping from there. Because he will have to face the brunt. And I can't get

11:19too close either. Even that is a problem. Am I multitasking? Am I not? You too are multitasking.

11:28Even as you are listening to me, you are also ensuring you stay within the frame. Multitasking

11:37is an imperative. But don't be a multiply divided person. Multiple selves are not welcome. Multitasking

11:51is alright. We live lives of multiple selves. One self, other self and all those selves are all

12:05fake, borrowed. This self taken from here. Who gave this self to you? You know, I got a kid and

12:16the kid gave me this self. Who gave this self to you? My father or my husband. Who gave this self

12:24to you? The shopkeeper, the market. Who gave that self to you? You know, my body, my physicality.

12:32Multiple selves. And those selves rarely agree with each other. So what do they do? Do the various

12:42branches of the tree fight with each other? Or do they dance with each other? Oh, in such beauty

12:49they dance with each other. Don't they? But the various, the multiple parts of the self, they fight

12:55with each other. One part of yourself is saying, you know, I need to fast. I am a religious man.

13:00The other part of yourself is saying, you know, I am a modern person. Should I believe in these

13:06antique things? I don't need to fast. One part is saying, you know, I am that obedient good chap

13:16that my mother brought up. The other one says, no, no, no. I am a cowboy. I am rather a playboy

13:25that my wife fell in love with. Now between being an obedient son and a playboy husband,

13:36you are torn apart. And sometimes you become an obedient husband. I need not utter the other side.

13:49Mothers will get offended. We can simply say disobedient son. Does that not happen? So that

14:06kind of multiplicity or duplicity is what we need to guard against.

14:20In love, you have to do many things. You have to. But all those things are for the one thing called love.

14:32I had this rabbit, Nandu. And those were the days I would sleep on the floor. And when I would be

14:54sleeping on the floor, that was the only time she would get active. She was quite sick. So all the

15:01day, she would just sit in her corner, could not run around like the other rabbits. And many times

15:10it happened because I was anxious about her health. In fact, her very being. She would utter some

15:23little noise and I would wake up. Many a times in my cabin I would be working and there was a small

15:33partition and she would be on that side. And the usual drill of the day and all the noise and the

15:46din. Have you heard a rabbit speak? The sound of a rabbit, have you heard? It's a very faint sound. They don't

15:58shout. They are such vulnerable creatures that even if they have to signal to other rabbits, they just stamp

16:07their feet. They don't utter much from their throats. They do utter some sounds. But I noticed, I was working, I

16:16would be speaking to someone and there would be the usual noise around me as there is in any workplace. And it

16:23would utter something and I would know it has said something. And I would go and pick it up. So you are

16:32multitasking. You know what's going on. Even if you are occupied in 10 things, that one little thing matters so

16:43much to you. You cannot get yourself off it. And it's not as if only that thing matters. Something else matters

16:57in an equally big way. So if this happens, you go to this. If that happens, you go to that. But it's not this

17:05versus that. This and that are two parts of the same harmony. If this calls for your attention, you give yourselves to this.

17:18If that calls for your attention, you give yourselves to that. But it's never this versus that. And if in your life, it's

17:25this versus that, then it's a problematic life. This versus that, this thing should not be there in life. One branch

17:38fighting against the other is quite inauspicious. The tree would die.

17:43Applies to organizations as well. If one department fights against another, the organization would die.

17:52Thank you, Akshay Rajiv. Thank you so much.

Category

Transcript

Recommended