Tyrian White case and Ahmed Farhad's disappearance: Two important case hearing IHC | Inside News
Tyrian White case and Ahmed Farhad's disappearance: Two important case hearing IHC | Inside News
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Hussain, please tell us about the case of Tarian White and the case of Ahmad Farhad Shire, which was postponed till Friday.
00:10What happened in both the cases today?
00:12The Tarian case was suspended for a total of 10 minutes, because as you remember, last year, two judges gave their opinions and the case was considered unsubstantiated.
00:27The Chief Justice was told that the bench was broken and a new one was to be formed.
00:35The new bench consisted of Justice Tariq Mahmood Jahangiri, Justice Arbaab Tahir and Justice Samad Rifat Imtiaz.
00:41When the three judges started the hearing, one of them, Hamid Ali Shah, who was a lawyer, asked him to open the case and read what was in it.
00:52When he saw what was in it, he said that the lawyer, Salman Akram Raja, has filed a request for a postponement.
00:58So, when he went to Canada, he filed this request.
01:02When he went to the bench, he was asked, what do you think, the decision of this case has already been made, because two judges have already given their opinions.
01:10So, what will you say about this?
01:12The court also said that the decision of this case has already been made.
01:16So, the Tarian White case is unsubstantiated and the request for a postponement has also been suspended.
01:23As far as the second case is concerned, the case of Maghvi Shahid Ahmed Farhad, all the hearings today were held under the supervision of Attorney General.
01:32Attorney General was also present in the case of a missing person.
01:37At that time, the court also heard the case of Judge Nusrat Akhter Qiyani and gave a lot of praise.
01:44He said that Attorney General's efforts were absolutely correct and we praise him.
01:49At the same time, the court also said that we do not just want to hear about missing persons or such cases.
01:55We have made a committee and we want to hear the cases of FBR and Revenue soon.
02:03As far as the case of Shahid Ahmed Farhad is concerned, Attorney General said in the beginning that he would give some time until Friday.
02:11This time, the court said that Attorney General is a law officer from all over the country.
02:17Now he is saying that we accept his request.
02:20The court has given time until Friday and has also given remarks that we hope that Attorney General will now fulfill his commitment.
02:30Secretary Dakhla came, Secretary Defa did not come. What remarks were given on that and what was said by the judge?
02:37As soon as the hearing began, the court also asked who has come.
02:41Attorney General himself was presented.
02:43He said that IJ Islamabad has come, while Secretary Dakhla has also come, while Secretary Defa has not come.
02:49But the legal director of the Ministry of Defense is present here.
02:53And along with that, the other senior officials, Deputy Attorney General, Additional Attorney General, were all present there.
03:00However, Secretary Defa did not come.
03:02After that, the court gave more importance to Attorney General's words.
03:06And said that if Attorney General is saying that he is making a commitment, he has already made a commitment in the Supreme Court.
03:13So we can't argue about it anymore.
03:16Hassan wants to ask you a small question.
03:18Hussain Chaudhry, basically, the poet from Kashmir, Ahmad Farad, is missing.
03:27So, has there been any talk about the missing person commission?
03:31Was there any talk that his chairman, Justice Retired Javed Iqbal Sahib, when he was Chairman NAB, no court asked for him.
03:39We saw that all the other Chairman NABs who have come, the courts have been asking for them.
03:45So, has there been any mention of Justice Retired Javed Iqbal or his missing person commission in this case?
03:56Yes, there has been no mention of the missing person commission.
04:02However, in the case of Ahmad Farad, there was a new turn of events.
04:07Hassan Bhai, he came every week.
04:09When his wife received a call and it was said that you should take back the request of Ahmad Farad.
04:15That is a free claim, right?
04:17That is a free claim.
04:18So, the court should take it in its own way.
04:21Hassan, thank you very much.
04:23Hassan, thank you very much.
04:24Hassan, the claim that is taken in the court is wrong.
04:28This is the court. I have to decide.
04:30That is the case of the missing person commission.
04:32The case of the missing person commission is the case of the missing person commission.
04:34Prime Minister, Nazir Tariq Sahib, the law minister, is saying that you have belittled the Prime Minister by mentioning him in his remarks.
04:45Listen to what he is saying.
04:47These are unnecessary things.
04:49These are suppositions.
04:50If this does not happen, then this will be done.
04:52If this does not happen, then this will be done.
04:55These things do not look good.
04:57Because of them, there is a juggling of institutions.
05:00Today, I understand that the Prime Minister and the cabinet were belittled because of the perception of the people.
05:08Yes, Mr. Jai.
05:38There will be dual citizenship.
05:40He will not be able to become a law officer.
05:42No, he will not be able to become a law officer.
05:43Then what will happen?
05:44Isn't there any other work?
05:46The country is in a state of devastation due to inflation.
05:49People are being forced out of their homes.
05:52Those who have 2-4 lakhs are running away from the country.
05:54Those who are earning 10-20 lakhs are also not staying here.
05:57You should have fixed this atmosphere.
05:59You should have locked up the person.
06:03You should have presented him in the court the next day.
06:05Then what would have happened?
06:08All this is going against the law and the constitution.
06:13Even though he is the Prime Minister, he is saying such things which are disappointing.
06:22Even if he does not become the Prime Minister in the future, then what will he say?
06:28Yes, Mr. Nagri.
06:29This matter is in front of you.
06:31Of course, we have to discuss the matters that become part of the public discourse.
06:37The wife of Ahmed Farhad is present in the court.
06:44She is giving an application.
06:46Whatever incidents are happening with her, she is telling.
06:50She is his lawyer.
06:51She is present in the court.
06:52If the judge is listening to her request, listening to her application, then what is wrong in this?
06:58The court has the right to listen to every side of the case.
07:04It also has the right to decide.
07:06No dictation can be given to anyone in this regard.
07:09But when it is said that the courts are being accused,
07:18the last two and a half years have been mentioned.
07:20Let's start from there.
07:22When the Supreme Court gave a decision in April 2022,
07:27who were the people who were shooting at the judges of the Supreme Court in London, Pakistan and other cities?
07:35Someone counted them.
07:37Someone asked them how bad the campaign against the Supreme Court Chief Justice was run in April 2022.
07:45All this is present.
07:46It is also present on social media.
07:47And who are they now?
07:48After that, there was also a meeting.
07:50Mr. Nagri, you know that there was also a meeting in front of the Supreme Court.
07:56There was also an audio of the Chief Justice's mother-in-law.
08:03There was a petition filed in Islamabad High Court.
08:05Mr. Raghupat Hassan has insulted the court.
08:08We hope that Islamabad High Court will listen to him too.